• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于土壤质量指数面积法和土壤敏感性-抗性法的非粮耕地土壤健康评价——以宁波市为例

[Soil Health Evaluation of Non-grain Cultivated Land Based on Soil Quality Index Area Method and Soil Sensitivity-resistance Method: A Case Study of Ningbo City].

作者信息

Yang Ya-Ting, Qin Fang-Jin, Wang Shuang, Wang Cong, Zhu Zhen-Ke, Li Gang, Jin Shu-Quan, Ge Ti-da

机构信息

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.

State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3877-3889. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406021.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202406021
PMID:40582822
Abstract

The aim of this study was to understand the soil health status of non-grain cultivated land in Ningbo, identify the main obstacle factors of non-grain cultivated land, explore the effect of non-grain on soil quality, and construct a comprehensive soil health evaluation system of non-grain cultivated land in Ningbo. Taking the soil of control cultivated land and typical non-grain cultivated land in Ningbo as the research object, 268 surface soil samples of 0-20 cm were collected under the utilization of control cultivated land, orchards, and nursery-grown plants. The 22 indexes of soil physics, chemistry, biology, and heavy metals were determined; the minimum data set was constructed by using principal component analysis, correlation analysis, and Norm value; and the soil health evaluation system in Ningbo was constructed using the soil quality index area method and soil sensitivity-resistance method, combined with soil multifunctionality to judge the quality of non-grain cultivated land in Ningbo. The results showed that: ① Compared with the soil of control cultivated land, soil bulk density (BD) in orchards and nursery-grown plants increased significantly (<0.05), while the contents of organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (AP), available copper (ACu), soil extracellular enzyme activity, and soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) decreased significantly (<0.05). ② The minimum data set for soil health evaluation of non-grain cultivated land in Ningbo consisted of BD, electrical conductivity (EC), SOC, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), tammonium nitrogen (NH-N), TN, available iron (AFe), available manganese (AMn), and acid phosphatase (Phos). The minimum data set verified by the total data set could reflect the effective information of non-grain soil quality in Ningbo. ③ Based on the soil quality index area method, the content of SOC, TN, AFe, AMn, and Phos in the cultivated land under non-grain utilization was lower than that of the control cultivated land. ④ According to the sensitivity and resistance analysis, the soil sensitive indexes included SOC, DOC, NH-N, TN, AFe, and AMn, and the resistance index was BD and EC. ⑤ The random forest model showed that TN, SOC, -acetyl--D-glucosidase (NAG), and Phos were the main driving factors of soil multifunctionality index, while AFe, AMn, Phos, and DOC were the main driving factors of soil quality index. On the whole, the soil quality index and soil multifunctionality index of the two non-grain planting methods were lower than those of the control cultivated soil. Therefore, this study determined the health status of non-grain soil in Ningbo, identified the main obstacle factors of non-grain cultivated land, and provided some data support and theoretical basis for the classification and renovation of non-grain cultivated land and ensuring food security in Ningbo.

摘要

本研究旨在了解宁波非粮耕地的土壤健康状况,识别非粮耕地的主要障碍因素,探究非粮利用对土壤质量的影响,并构建宁波非粮耕地土壤健康综合评价体系。以宁波对照耕地和典型非粮耕地土壤为研究对象,在对照耕地、果园和苗圃利用方式下采集了268个0 - 20 cm表层土壤样本。测定了土壤物理、化学、生物和重金属22项指标;采用主成分分析、相关分析和规范值构建最小数据集;运用土壤质量指数面积法和土壤敏感性 - 抗性法,结合土壤多功能性构建宁波土壤健康评价体系,以评判宁波非粮耕地质量。结果表明:①与对照耕地土壤相比,果园和苗圃土壤的容重(BD)显著增加(<0.05),而有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、有效磷(AP)、有效铜(ACu)、土壤胞外酶活性和土壤微生物量碳(MBC)含量显著降低(<0.05)。②宁波非粮耕地土壤健康评价最小数据集由BD、电导率(EC)、SOC、溶解有机碳(DOC)、铵态氮(NH-N)、TN、有效铁(AFe)、有效锰(AMn)和酸性磷酸酶(Phos)组成。经全数据集验证的最小数据集能够反映宁波非粮土壤质量的有效信息。③基于土壤质量指数面积法,非粮利用下耕地的SOC、TN、AFe、AMn和Phos含量低于对照耕地。④根据敏感性和抗性分析,土壤敏感指标包括SOC、DOC、NH-N、TN、AFe和AMn,抗性指标为BD和EC。⑤随机森林模型表明,TN、SOC、N - 乙酰 - β - D - 葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)和Phos是土壤多功能性指数的主要驱动因素,而AFe、AMn、Phos和DOC是土壤质量指数的主要驱动因素。总体而言,两种非粮种植方式的土壤质量指数和土壤多功能性指数均低于对照耕地土壤。因此,本研究明确了宁波非粮土壤健康状况,识别了非粮耕地主要障碍因素,为宁波非粮耕地分类整治及保障粮食安全提供了一定的数据支撑和理论依据。

相似文献

1
[Soil Health Evaluation of Non-grain Cultivated Land Based on Soil Quality Index Area Method and Soil Sensitivity-resistance Method: A Case Study of Ningbo City].基于土壤质量指数面积法和土壤敏感性-抗性法的非粮耕地土壤健康评价——以宁波市为例
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3877-3889. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406021.
2
[Spatial-temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land NPP in Major Grain Producing Areas (Henan Province)].[主要粮食产区(河南省)耕地净初级生产力的时空分异特征及影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3632-3644. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406053.
3
[Soil health evaluation of non-grain cultivated land: A case study of Dongwu Town, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China].
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Oct;35(10):2785-2793. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202410.018.
4
[Spatial Partitioning and Influencing Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in Karst and Non-Karst Regions of Southeast Yunnan Province].[滇东南岩溶与非岩溶地区土壤有机碳的空间分异及影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3846-3855. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202405239.
5
[Influence of Straw Return and Fertilizer Matching on Microbial Quantity and Stoichiometric Characteristics and Microbial Entropy of Winter Wheat Soils].秸秆还田与肥料配施对冬小麦土壤微生物数量、化学计量特征及微生物熵的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3957-3964. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202405157.
6
[Effects of Soil Water and Availability of Carbon and Nitrogen on CH and CO Emissions in Paddy Soil].[土壤水分及碳氮有效性对稻田土壤CH和CO排放的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3999-4010. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406182.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Characterization of Microbial Carbon Metabolism in Karst Soils from Citrus Orchards and Analysis of Its Environmental Drivers.柑橘果园岩溶土壤中微生物碳代谢特征及其环境驱动因素分析
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 25;13(2):267. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020267.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.