Ryan Sarah T, Norman Jennifer
School of Social Sciences, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Early Start, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70063. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70063.
To critically reflect on a collaborative research partnership between university-based researchers, a state government-funded health promotion workforce, and policy makers, focused on promoting healthy eating and active living for children funded by the New South Wales (NSW) Health Prevention Research Support Program (PRSP).
Government bodies and academic institutions frequently operate in silos, creating knowledge translation challenges. Research takes time to reach practitioners, hindering uptake of evidence-based interventions in public health settings.
Qualitative reflective evaluation.
Thirty key stakeholders from the PRSP funded 'EnHANCE' research group collaboration were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. Open-ended questions were structured around the six themes of Gibbs' Reflective Cycle (1998), to allow participants to reflect on their collaborative experiences spanning July 2017 to June 2022. Participants included University of Wollongong academics, PhD candidates, and NSW Health staff (managers and health promotion officers). Data were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis process, systematically identifying, analysing, and grouping into themes to highlight both the challenges and successes experienced by participants.
Fifteen participants responded. Challenges included COVID-19 disruptions, navigating jurisdictional diversity, and initial misalignment of organisational priorities. Notable successes emerged, including the establishment of a strong, equitable research partnership, timely local implementation of research findings, enhanced cross-jurisdictional learning and gradual alignment of research and health promotion priorities as relationships strengthened. A critical factor for the success of this collaboration has been the successive PRSP funding rounds which have given partnerships time to mature and be productive.
The PRSP demonstrates an effective funding model for facilitating meaningful collaboration between academics, policymakers, and practitioners. Future funding schemes should aim to include opportunities to build strong collaborations, and researchers should integrate and explore adaptive, responsive models of cross-organisational research partnerships.
批判性地反思大学研究人员、州政府资助的健康促进工作团队以及政策制定者之间的合作研究伙伴关系,该伙伴关系聚焦于由新南威尔士州(NSW)健康预防研究支持项目(PRSP)资助的儿童健康饮食与积极生活方式推广。
政府机构和学术机构常常各自为政,造成知识转化方面的挑战。研究成果需要时间才能传达给从业者,这阻碍了公共卫生环境中基于证据的干预措施的采用。
定性反思性评估。
邀请来自PRSP资助的“增强”(EnHANCE)研究小组合作项目的30名关键利益相关者完成一项匿名在线调查。开放式问题围绕吉布斯反思循环(1998年)的六个主题构建,以便参与者反思他们在2017年7月至2022年6月期间的合作经历。参与者包括卧龙岗大学的学者、博士生以及新南威尔士州卫生部工作人员(管理人员和健康促进官员)。数据采用演绎主题分析流程进行分析,系统地识别、分析并归纳为主题,以突出参与者所经历的挑战和成功之处。
15名参与者做出回应。挑战包括新冠疫情干扰、应对管辖权差异以及组织优先事项最初的不一致。显著的成功包括建立了强大、公平的研究伙伴关系,研究结果在当地及时得到实施,跨管辖权学习得到加强,以及随着关系的加强,研究与健康促进优先事项逐渐趋于一致。这一合作成功的一个关键因素是PRSP连续的资助轮次,这使伙伴关系有时间成熟并富有成效。
PRSP展示了一种有效的资助模式,有助于促进学者、政策制定者和从业者之间有意义的合作。未来的资助计划应旨在提供建立强大合作关系的机会,研究人员应整合并探索跨组织研究伙伴关系的适应性、响应性模式。