Ciren Yangzong, Gong Jianhong, Li Furong, Gong Xiaofeng, Danzeng Dunzhu, Ning Yanping, Wang Tianheng, Tian Xiaobing, Silang Quzha
Medical College, Tibet University, Lhasa, China.
School of Medicine, Shanxi Datong University, Datong, Shanxi, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1539922. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539922. eCollection 2025.
The aim of the study was to examine the cognitive function of Tibetan adolescents at different altitudes and evaluate the influence of education and urbanization on child's cognition at high altitudes.
A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2015 and September 2016 in four counties in Tibet. The study population included 324 adolescents living at an altitude of 2,800 m, including 227 who grew up at altitudes of 4,300 m, and 732 adolescents attending three high-altitude boarding schools (one at 4,300 m and two at 4,500 m), including 119 who grew up at an altitude of 2,800 m. Fluid reasoning was assessed using Standard Progressive Matrices (SPMs). The background information was collected using self-administered questionnaires.
A multilevel linear regression model was used to determine the effects of altitude, education, and urbanization on fluid reasoning. In the fixed-effects model, the average SPM score of adolescents from low altitudes who attended kindergarten was 40.41. Scores of students who moved from high to low altitudes, came from high altitudes, and moved from low to high altitudes were 2.66, 4.71, and 6.70 points lower, respectively, than those of students from low altitudes, and 2.50 points lower in students who had not attended kindergarten than those who had. In the random-effects model, the scores of those who only went to first grade were 2.93 points lower. Students from County 3 had average scores of 1.89 higher than did students from the other three counties.
High altitudes may negatively affect the cognition of Tibetan adolescents. This effect was reduced by moving to a lower altitude, increasing the number of years of formal education, attending kindergarten, and living in a more urbanized location. Even at high altitude, moving to higher altitudes should be avoided.
本研究旨在调查不同海拔地区藏族青少年的认知功能,并评估教育和城市化对高海拔地区儿童认知的影响。
2015年10月至2016年9月在西藏四个县进行了一项横断面研究。研究人群包括324名生活在海拔2800米的青少年,其中227名在海拔4300米长大,以及732名就读于三所高海拔寄宿学校(一所位于4300米,两所位于4500米)的青少年,其中119名在海拔2800米长大。使用标准渐进矩阵(SPM)评估流体推理能力。通过自填问卷收集背景信息。
采用多水平线性回归模型确定海拔、教育和城市化对流体推理的影响。在固定效应模型中,上过幼儿园的低海拔青少年的平均SPM得分为40.41。从高海拔地区迁至低海拔地区、来自高海拔地区以及从低海拔地区迁至高海拔地区的学生的得分分别比低海拔地区的学生低2.66、4.71和6.70分,未上过幼儿园的学生比上过幼儿园的学生低2.50分。在随机效应模型中,只上过一年级的学生得分低2.93分。3县的学生平均得分比其他3个县的学生高1.89分。
高海拔可能对藏族青少年的认知产生负面影响。搬到较低海拔地区、增加正规教育年限、上幼儿园以及生活在城市化程度更高的地区可减少这种影响。即使在高海拔地区,也应避免迁往更高海拔地区。