• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测因急性上消化道出血入院的肝硬化患者院内死亡率的风险评分系统。

Risk scoring systems to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis admitted with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

作者信息

Bou Daher Halim, Gregoski Mathew J, Rockey Don C

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Investig Med. 2025 Jun 30:10815589251357622. doi: 10.1177/10815589251357622.

DOI:10.1177/10815589251357622
PMID:40586355
Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Here, we developed a new-and examined previous UGIB predictor models-in cirrhotic patients with UGIB. We analyzed consecutive patients with cirrhosis and UGIB admitted to our center from 2011 to 2018. Predictors of mortality during index admissions were identified using logistic regression and existing scoring system were compared using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROCs). In addition, classification and regression trees (CART) analyses were conducted with v-fold cross-validation. Three hundred thirty-three patients with cirrhosis were admitted with UGIB; 294 (88%) survived and 39 (12%) expired. Those who expired were more likely to have Child-Pugh C cirrhosis (67% vs 32%, p < 0.001), hypotension, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Endoscopic sources of bleeding were similar in both groups, with esophageal varices being the most common culprit lesion. Regression analysis yielded a model including systolic blood pressure, model of end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na), and alanine aminotransferase on admission as having the best mortality predictive capability (AUROC, 0.83). MELD-Na, MELD 3.0, MELD, Lyles-Rockey, AIMS65, Rockall, and Glasgow-Blatchford scores were all significantly higher in patients who expired vs survivors; of these scoring systems, MELD-Na and MELD were the best predictors of death (AUROCs = 0.81 and 0.80), respectively. In addition, CART identified MELD-Na as the strongest predictor of mortality. The MELD score appears to be an accurate predictor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and UGIB; since the MELD score is well-established and widely used in patients with cirrhosis, we suggest that it be the primary tool utilized to predict mortality in practice.

摘要

上消化道出血(UGIB)与肝硬化患者的不良预后相关。在此,我们开发了一种新的——并检验了先前的UGIB预测模型——用于肝硬化合并UGIB的患者。我们分析了2011年至2018年期间入住我们中心的连续性肝硬化合并UGIB患者。使用逻辑回归确定首次入院期间的死亡预测因素,并使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROCs)比较现有的评分系统。此外,进行了分类与回归树(CART)分析及v折交叉验证。333例肝硬化患者因UGIB入院;294例(88%)存活,39例(12%)死亡。死亡患者更可能患有Child-Pugh C级肝硬化(67%对32%,p<0.001)、低血压、肝性脑病和肝细胞癌。两组的内镜下出血来源相似,食管静脉曲张是最常见的病因。回归分析得出一个模型,该模型纳入入院时的收缩压、终末期肝病-钠模型(MELD-Na)和丙氨酸氨基转移酶,其具有最佳的死亡预测能力(AUROC,0.83)。死亡患者的MELD-Na、MELD 3.0、MELD、Lyles-Rockey、AIMS65、Rockall和Glasgow-Blatchford评分均显著高于存活患者;在这些评分系统中,MELD-Na和MELD分别是最佳的死亡预测指标(AUROCs分别为0.81和0.80)。此外,CART分析确定MELD-Na是最强的死亡预测因素。MELD评分似乎是肝硬化合并UGIB患者死亡的准确预测指标;由于MELD评分已得到充分确立且在肝硬化患者中广泛应用,我们建议在实践中它应作为预测死亡的主要工具。

相似文献

1
Risk scoring systems to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis admitted with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.预测因急性上消化道出血入院的肝硬化患者院内死亡率的风险评分系统。
J Investig Med. 2025 Jun 30:10815589251357622. doi: 10.1177/10815589251357622.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Comparison of the new risk score (ABL) with the Glasgow Blatchford Score, AIMS65, and pre-endoscopic Rockall Score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to the emergency department.急诊科收治的上消化道出血患者中,新风险评分(ABL)与格拉斯哥布莱奇福德评分、AIMS65评分及内镜前罗卡尔评分的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01291-z.
4
[Construction of a machine learning prognostic prediction model based on psoas muscle index for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis].[基于腰大肌指数构建失代偿期肝硬化患者的机器学习预后预测模型]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2025 Jul 20;33(7):667-673. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20231123-00222.
5
The unwell patient with advanced chronic liver disease: when to use each score?患有晚期慢性肝病的不适患者:何时使用每种评分?
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 9;23(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04185-w.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
Platelet-albumin-bilirubin score - a risk stratification scoring system to predict outcome of acute variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.血小板-白蛋白-胆红素评分:一种预测肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者预后的风险分层评分系统。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Sep 1;35(9):1044-1048. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002600. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Liver fibrosis stage based on the four factors (FIB-4) score or Forns index in adults with chronic hepatitis C.基于四项因素(FIB-4)评分或 Forns 指数的成人慢性丙型肝炎肝纤维化分期。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 13;8(8):CD011929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011929.pub2.
10
Nutritional support for liver disease.肝病的营养支持
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD008344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008344.pub2.