Pandya Rajul E, Boyd Amanda D, Feliú-Mójer Mónica I, Yanovitzky Itzhak
Mary Lou Fulton College for Teaching and Learning Innovation and Julie Ann Wrigley Global Futures Laboratory, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Department of Medical and Clinical Sciences, The Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400929122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400929122. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
There is a critical need to strengthen science-society relationships-especially with historically marginalized communities-if we are to better and more equitably manage complicated, intertwined, global challenges at the intersection of environment, health, equity, and well-being. Community-engaged science, which focuses on shared leadership and mutual benefit in scientific partnership with communities, has the potential to transform science, communities, and even society. Despite this promise, however, community-engaged science is not always transformative. Presentations and discussions at the 5th National Academies Science Communication Colloquium demonstrated the importance of creating structures, practices, and a culture of science engagement that prioritizes listening and learning from communities. Based on presentations at the colloquium, research publications, and our own experiences, we share a set of evidence-informed principles that are common to successful community-engaged science across many contexts: respect, humility, listening, reciprocity, mutuality, and reflexivity. We also offer steps the scientific community can take to advance and improve the transformative practice of community-engaged science as part of a productive ecosystem of scientific activities: evolving norms and culture, integrating community science into current systems, building incentives and structures to support community-engaged science, developing a workforce skilled in community engagement, and investing in a coordinated research-to-practice agenda.
如果我们要更好、更公平地应对环境、健康、公平和福祉等诸多复杂且相互交织的全球性挑战,就迫切需要加强科学与社会的关系——尤其是与历史上处于边缘地位的社区的关系。社区参与科学,专注于在与社区的科学合作中实现共同领导和互利共赢,有潜力改变科学、社区乃至整个社会。然而,尽管有这些前景,但社区参与科学并不总是具有变革性。在第五届美国国家科学院科学传播研讨会上的报告和讨论表明,创建重视倾听社区意见并向其学习的科学参与架构、实践和文化非常重要。基于研讨会上的报告、研究出版物以及我们自身的经验,我们分享一系列基于证据的原则,这些原则在许多情况下成功的社区参与科学中都很常见:尊重、谦逊、倾听、互惠、互利和反思。我们还提供了科学界可以采取的步骤,以推动和改进社区参与科学的变革性实践,使其成为科学活动富有成效的生态系统的一部分:完善规范和文化、将社区科学融入现有体系、建立支持社区参与科学的激励机制和架构、培养具备社区参与技能的劳动力,以及投资于协调一致的研究到实践议程。