• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医学人工智能应用开发中的参与式方法:机遇与挑战]

[Participatory approaches in the development of AI applications in medicine: opportunities and challenges].

作者信息

Heizmann Carolin, Gleim Patricia, Kellmeyer Philipp

机构信息

Data and Web Science Group, Fakultät für Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsmathematik, Universität Mannheim, B6, 26, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland.

Human-Technology Interaction Lab, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04095-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-025-04095-5
PMID:40588673
Abstract

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare not only holds the potential for efficiency gains, personalized medicine, and evidence-based decisions but also raises ethical and social challenges, such as bias, lack of transparency, and acceptance. Participatory approaches that actively involve patients, physicians, caregivers, and other stakeholders in the development process make it possible to align technological innovations with actual needs and to design them in a socially just way.The analysis distinguishes between participation as active co-design and partaking as access to social resources. Theoretical models such as the "ladder of participation" (Arnstein) illustrate the different levels of participation. In addition, methodological approaches such as action research, community-based participatory research, ethics by design, and value-sensitive design are discussed, which promote early ethical reflection and continuous user feedback.Practical examples such as KIPA (AI-supported patient information), KIDELIR (delirium prevention in care), and PRIVETDIS (neurotechnologies and mental privacy) show how participatory research can contribute to the optimization of care concepts. In addition to opportunities such as increased acceptance and user-centered technology design, challenges are identified, including limited resources, lack of representativeness, and invisible additional burdens for those involved. Finally, it is emphasized that in addition to technical and regulatory measures, continuous ethical reflection and transparent communication are essential to implement trustworthy and effective AI systems in healthcare.

摘要

人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的日益融入,不仅有望提高效率、实现个性化医疗并做出基于证据的决策,还引发了伦理和社会挑战,如偏见、缺乏透明度以及接受度问题。让患者、医生、护理人员和其他利益相关者积极参与开发过程的参与式方法,能够使技术创新与实际需求相匹配,并以社会公正的方式进行设计。该分析区分了作为积极共同设计的参与和作为获取社会资源的参与。诸如“参与阶梯”(阿恩斯坦)等理论模型阐释了不同的参与层次。此外,还讨论了行动研究、基于社区的参与式研究、设计伦理和价值敏感设计等方法,这些方法促进早期伦理反思和持续的用户反馈。KIPA(人工智能支持的患者信息)、KIDELIR(护理中预防谵妄)和PRIVETDIS(神经技术与精神隐私)等实际例子展示了参与式研究如何有助于优化护理理念。除了提高接受度和以用户为中心的技术设计等机遇外,还识别出了挑战,包括资源有限、缺乏代表性以及给相关人员带来无形的额外负担。最后强调,除了技术和监管措施外,持续的伦理反思和透明沟通对于在医疗保健领域实施值得信赖且有效的人工智能系统至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Participatory approaches in the development of AI applications in medicine: opportunities and challenges].[医学人工智能应用开发中的参与式方法:机遇与挑战]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04095-5.
2
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来:跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
From black box to clarity: Strategies for effective AI informed consent in healthcare.从黑箱到明晰:医疗保健中有效人工智能知情同意的策略。
Artif Intell Med. 2025 May 24;167:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103169.
5
Improving AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems and Their Integration Into Care From the Perspective of Experts: Interview Study Among Different Stakeholders.从专家视角看基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的改进及其在医疗中的整合:不同利益相关者访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 7;13:e69688. doi: 10.2196/69688.
6
Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical concerns and opportunities for patient-centered care.公众对医疗保健领域人工智能的看法:关注伦理问题,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 22;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01066-4.
7
Navigating ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence for patient care: A systematic review.在将人工智能用于患者护理中应对伦理考量:一项系统综述。
Int Nurs Rev. 2024 Nov 15. doi: 10.1111/inr.13059.
8
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Gaps in Artificial Intelligence Research for Rural Health in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国农村卫生人工智能研究的差距:一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 27:2025.06.26.25330361. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.26.25330361.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning.人工智能/机器学习中的伦理与偏见考量
Mod Pathol. 2025 Mar;38(3):100686. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Navigating the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act for Healthcare.解读欧盟人工智能医疗法案
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Aug 12;7(1):210. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01213-6.
3
Patient and public involvement to build trust in artificial intelligence: A framework, tools, and case studies.患者与公众参与以建立对人工智能的信任:一个框架、工具及案例研究。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Jun 10;3(6):100506. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100506.
4
Towards digital justice: participatory action research in global digital health.迈向数字正义:全球数字健康领域的参与式行动研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009351.
5
Ethical limitations of algorithmic fairness solutions in health care machine learning.医疗保健机器学习中算法公平性解决方案的伦理局限性
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 May;2(5):e221-e223. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30065-0.
6
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
7
A call to action for delirium research: Meta-analysis and regression of delirium associated mortality.呼吁开展谵妄研究:对谵妄相关死亡率的荟萃分析和回归分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01723-4.
8
Experience-based co-design-Adapting the method for a researcher-initiated study in a multi-site setting.基于经验的共同设计——在多地点环境中对研究者发起的研究进行方法调整。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):562-570. doi: 10.1111/hex.13028. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
9
The right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence.拒绝人工智能进行诊断和治疗规划的权利。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar;23(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09912-8.
10
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence.高性能医学:人机智能融合。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.