• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拒绝人工智能进行诊断和治疗规划的权利。

The right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence.

作者信息

Ploug Thomas, Holm Søren

机构信息

Department of Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Science, Aalborg University Copenhagen, A. C. Meyers Vænge 15, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.

Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar;23(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09912-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-019-09912-8
PMID:31359302
Abstract

In an analysis of artificially intelligent systems for medical diagnostics and treatment planning we argue that patients should be able to exercise a right to withdraw from AI diagnostics and treatment planning for reasons related to (1) the physician's role in the patients' formation of and acting on personal preferences and values, (2) the bias and opacity problem of AI systems, and (3) rational concerns about the future societal effects of introducing AI systems in the health care sector.

摘要

在一项针对用于医学诊断和治疗规划的人工智能系统的分析中,我们认为,患者应能够基于以下相关原因,行使退出人工智能诊断和治疗规划的权利:(1)医生在患者形成个人偏好和价值观并据此行动过程中所起的作用;(2)人工智能系统的偏差和不透明问题;(3)对在医疗保健领域引入人工智能系统可能产生的未来社会影响的合理担忧。

相似文献

1
The right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence.拒绝人工智能进行诊断和治疗规划的权利。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar;23(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09912-8.
2
Should we have a right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence?我们是否有权拒绝人工智能提供的诊断和治疗方案?
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Jun;23(2):247-252. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09939-2.
3
Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives.医疗工作流程中患者对人工智能的使用与控制:基于患者视角的单中心问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 17;23(2):e24221. doi: 10.2196/24221.
4
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.您的机器人治疗师现在为您服务:具身人工智能在精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的伦理意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 9;21(5):e13216. doi: 10.2196/13216.
5
How Should AI Be Developed, Validated, and Implemented in Patient Care?人工智能在患者护理中应如何开发、验证和实施?
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Feb 1;21(2):E125-130. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.125.
6
[Do artificial intelligence systems reason in the same way as clinicians when making diagnoses?].[人工智能系统在进行诊断时的推理方式与临床医生相同吗?]
Rev Med Interne. 2020 Mar;41(3):192-195. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
7
Five simple steps to improve an emergency physician's efficiency.提高急诊医生效率的五个简单步骤。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;26(9):1056-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.004.
8
Artificial Intelligence Systems Assisting Oncologists? Resist and Desist or Enlist and Coexist.人工智能系统辅助肿瘤学家?抵制还是合作。
Oncologist. 2019 Oct;24(10):1291-1293. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0267. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
The expanding role of ICU medical directors: from patient management to unit management.重症监护病房医疗主任角色的拓展:从患者管理到科室管理。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1995 Summer;3(4):31-6. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199503040-00004.
10
Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者对人工智能辅助症状检查器有用性的看法:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 30;22(1):e14679. doi: 10.2196/14679.

引用本文的文献

1
[Participatory approaches in the development of AI applications in medicine: opportunities and challenges].[医学人工智能应用开发中的参与式方法:机遇与挑战]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04095-5.
2
The need for patient rights in AI-driven healthcare - risk-based regulation is not enough.人工智能驱动的医疗保健中患者权利的必要性——基于风险的监管是不够的。
J R Soc Med. 2025 Jun 25:1410768251344707. doi: 10.1177/01410768251344707.
3
Proactive vs. passive algorithmic ethics practices in healthcare: the moderating role of healthcare engagement type in patients' responses.

本文引用的文献

1
Societal Issues Concerning the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.人工智能在医学应用中的社会问题。
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2019 Feb;5(1):11-17. doi: 10.1159/000492428. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
2
A Fully Automated Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Weight Loss: Longitudinal Observational Study Among Overweight and Obese Adults.一种用于减肥的全自动对话式人工智能:超重和肥胖成年人的纵向观察研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Nov 1;2(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8590.
3
Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms.算法时代的谷歌深度思维与医疗保健
医疗保健中主动与被动算法伦理实践:医疗保健参与类型在患者反应中的调节作用。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jun 7;26(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01236-y.
4
[Artificial intelligence in medicine-Opportunities and risks from an ethical perspective].[医学中的人工智能——从伦理角度看机遇与风险]
Ophthalmologie. 2025 Apr;122(4):278-285. doi: 10.1007/s00347-025-02224-8. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
5
Ethics of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment: mapping the terrain.胚胎评估中人工智能的伦理问题:勾勒全貌
Hum Reprod. 2025 Feb 1;40(2):179-185. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae264.
6
Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.临床医生在使用人工智能方面的角色和必要的理解水平:一项对德国医学生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w.
7
The Role of Humanization and Robustness of Large Language Models in Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Individuals With Depression: A Critical Analysis.大型语言模型的人性化和稳健性在抑郁症患者对话人工智能中的作用:批判性分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jul 2;11:e56569. doi: 10.2196/56569.
8
Patient perspectives on informed consent for medical AI: A web-based experiment.患者对医学人工智能知情同意的看法:一项基于网络的实验。
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 30;10:20552076241247938. doi: 10.1177/20552076241247938. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine.医学人工智能的伦理问题。
Singapore Med J. 2024 Mar 1;65(3):150-158. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-279. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
10
Women's perceptions and attitudes towards the use of AI in mammography in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.瑞典女性对乳腺 X 光摄影中使用人工智能的看法和态度:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 14;14(2):e084014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084014.
Health Technol (Berl). 2017;7(4):351-367. doi: 10.1007/s12553-017-0179-1. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
4
Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine.机器学习在医学领域的意外后果。
JAMA. 2017 Aug 8;318(6):517-518. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7797.
5
Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?机器学习能否利用常规临床数据改善心血管疾病风险预测?
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 4;12(4):e0174944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174944. eCollection 2017.
6
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.基于深度神经网络的皮肤癌皮肤科医生级分类。
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118. doi: 10.1038/nature21056. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
7
Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths.自动化的自由言论分析可预测高危青年的精神病发病。
NPJ Schizophr. 2015 Aug 26;1:15030. doi: 10.1038/npjschz.2015.30. eCollection 2015.
8
The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.大数据伦理:生物医学背景下的当前及可预见问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):303-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2. Epub 2015 May 23.
9
Automation bias: empirical results assessing influencing factors.自动化偏差:影响因素的实证研究结果。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 May;83(5):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
10
Artificial intelligence in medicine and cardiac imaging: harnessing big data and advanced computing to provide personalized medical diagnosis and treatment.人工智能在医学和心脏成像中的应用:利用大数据和先进计算为医疗诊断和治疗提供个性化方案。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Jan;16(1):441. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0441-8.