University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):562-570. doi: 10.1111/hex.13028. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
Experience-based co-design (EBCD) brings patients and staff together to co-design services. It is normally conducted in one organization which initiates and implements the process. We used the traditional EBCD method with a number of adaptations as part of a larger research study in the British National Health Service.
The primary aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting research-initiated EBCD, to enhance intervention development prior to testing. As well as embedding the method in a research study, there were 3 further key adaptations: (a) working across primary and secondary care sectors, (b) working on multiple sites and (c) incorporating theory-informed analysis.
We recruited four sites (covering both primary and secondary care) and, on each site, conducted the initial traditional EBCD meetings, with separate staff and patient groups-followed by a single joint patient-staff event, where four priority areas for co-design were agreed. This event was driven by theory-informed analysis, as well as the traditional trigger film of patient experiences. Each site worked on one priority area, and the four co-design groups met over 2-3 months to design prototype tools. A second joint event was held (not usually undertaken in single-site EBCD) where they shared and compared outputs. The research team combined elements of these outputs to create an intervention, now being tested in a cluster randomized controlled trial.
EBCD can be successfully adapted for use across an entire patient pathway with multiple organizations and as part of a research process to identify an intervention for subsequent testing in a randomized trial. Our pragmatic approach used the patient experience to identify areas for improvement and co-designed an intervention which directly reflected patient priorities.
基于经验的共同设计(EBCD)将患者和员工聚集在一起共同设计服务。它通常由发起和实施该过程的一个组织进行。我们在英国国民保健制度的一项更大规模的研究中使用了传统的 EBCD 方法,并进行了一些调整。
主要目的是评估进行研究发起的 EBCD 的可行性和可接受性,以在测试之前增强干预措施的开发。除了将该方法嵌入研究之外,还有 3 个关键调整:(a)跨越初级和二级保健部门工作,(b)在多个地点工作,以及(c)纳入理论指导的分析。
我们招募了四个地点(涵盖初级和二级保健),在每个地点,我们都进行了最初的传统 EBCD 会议,分别有员工和患者群体参加,然后是一次单一的联合患者-员工活动,在该活动中,四个共同设计的优先领域得到了一致同意。该活动由理论指导的分析以及患者经验的传统触发电影驱动。每个地点都致力于一个优先领域,四个共同设计小组在 2-3 个月内会面,设计原型工具。然后举行了第二次联合活动(在单一地点 EBCD 中通常不进行),他们在那里分享和比较成果。研究团队将这些成果的元素结合起来,创建了一个干预措施,现在正在一项集群随机对照试验中进行测试。
EBCD 可以成功地适应于整个患者路径中的多个组织,并作为研究过程的一部分,以确定随后在随机试验中进行测试的干预措施。我们的实用方法利用患者体验来确定需要改进的领域,并共同设计了直接反映患者优先事项的干预措施。