Ghaffarifar Saeideh, Naghdi Sadeh Reza, Ghaemmaghami Mehrdad, Parchehbaf Mohseni Mohammad Hossein
Medical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Research Center of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;19(4):412-423. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16554.
Compiling and designing short and practical psychometric tools are among the benefits and strengths of a good standard test. The Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire measures patients' delirium status. Accordingly, the main aim of this research was to check the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire. This exploratory psychometric study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 at the therapeutic research training centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The study population included patients diagnosed with delirium. Content and construct validity were assessed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using SPSS 18, which helped identify the underlying factor structure, while confirmatory factor analysis in Smart PLS was employed to confirm the structure's fit. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the consistency between different raters, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. These methods were selected for their robustness in evaluating the instrument's psychometric properties, ensuring the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire. The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire, consisting of 11 items, demonstrated strong psychometric properties. The average impact factor was 3.24, indicating a high relevance of the items. The content validity ratio was 0.78, and the content validity index was 0.87, both above the acceptable thresholds, confirming the content validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 0.77, reflecting good internal consistency. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index was 0.88, and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (χ² = 278.45, P < 0.001), indicating the appropriateness of the data for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors that explained 76.09% of the total variance, supporting the questionnaire's construct validity. Additionally, Pearson's correlation coefficient between the assessments of two nurses was 0.91, signifying inter-rater solid reliability. The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity, as confirmed by the comprehensive psychometric evaluation conducted in this study. The strong internal consistency, significant content and construct validity, and high inter-rater reliability underscore its effectiveness in assessing delirium in Persian-speaking patients. These findings highlight the questionnaire's suitability for clinical use, providing a reliable and valid instrument for accurately diagnosing and managing delirium in diverse healthcare settings.
编制和设计简短实用的心理测量工具是优秀标准测试的优点和优势之一。谵妄量表问卷用于测量患者的谵妄状态。因此,本研究的主要目的是检验该问卷波斯语版本的信效度。
这项探索性心理测量研究于2021年至2022年在大不里士医科大学的治疗研究培训中心进行。研究人群包括被诊断为谵妄的患者。采用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析评估内容效度和结构效度。使用SPSS 18进行探索性因素分析,以帮助识别潜在的因素结构,同时在Smart PLS中进行验证性因素分析以确认结构的拟合度。使用Pearson相关性评估不同评分者之间的一致性,并计算Cronbach's alpha以评估内部一致性。选择这些方法是因为它们在评估工具的心理测量特性方面具有稳健性,确保了谵妄量表问卷波斯语版本的信效度。
谵妄量表问卷的波斯语版本由11个项目组成,具有很强的心理测量特性。平均影响因子为3.24,表明项目具有高度相关性。内容效度比为0.78,内容效度指数为0.87,均高于可接受阈值,证实了问卷的内容效度。整个问卷的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.77,反映出良好的内部一致性。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin指数为0.88,Bartlett球形检验具有显著性(χ² = 278.45,P < 0.001),表明数据适合进行因素分析。探索性因素分析揭示了两个因素,解释了总方差的76.09%,支持了问卷的结构效度。此外,两名护士评估之间的Pearson相关系数为0.91,表明评分者间具有可靠的信度。
本研究进行的综合心理测量评估证实,谵妄量表问卷的波斯语版本具有可接受的信效度。强大的内部一致性、显著的内容效度和结构效度以及高评分者间信度强调了其在评估说波斯语患者谵妄方面的有效性。这些发现突出了该问卷适用于临床,为在不同医疗环境中准确诊断和管理谵妄提供了可靠有效的工具。