Suppr超能文献

谵妄运动亚型在现象学和促成病因学方面有何不同?联络精神病学和姑息治疗患者的横断面、多地点研究。

How do delirium motor subtypes differ in phenomenology and contributory aetiology? a cross-sectional, multisite study of liaison psychiatry and palliative care patients.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e041214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041214.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether delirium motor subtypes differ in terms of phenomenology and contributory aetiology.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

International study incorporating data from Ireland and India across palliative care, old age liaison psychiatry and general adult liaison psychiatry settings.

PARTICIPANTS

1757 patients diagnosed with delirium using criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth edition (DSM IV).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Hyperactive, mixed and hypoactive delirium subtypes were identified using the abbreviated version of the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale. Phenomenology was assessed using the Delirium Rating Scale Revised. Contributory aetiologies were assessed using the Delirium Aetiology Checklist (DEC), with a score >2 indicating that the aetiology was likely or definitely contributory.

RESULTS

Hypoactive delirium was associated with dementia, cerebrovascular and systemic infection aetiologies (p<0.001) and had a lower overall burden of delirium symptoms than the other motor subtypes. Hyperactive delirium was associated with younger age, drug withdrawal and the DEC category other systemic aetiologies (p<0.001). Mixed delirium showed the greatest symptom burden and was more often associated with drug intoxication and metabolic disturbance (p<0.001). All three delirium motor subtypes had similar levels of impairment in attention and visuospatial functioning but differed significantly when compared with no subtype (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates a pattern of aetiology and symptomatology of delirium motor subtypes across a large international sample that had previously been lacking. It serves to improve our understanding of this complex condition and has implications in terms of early detection and management of delirium.

摘要

目的

研究谵妄运动亚型在表型和促成病因学方面是否存在差异。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

国际研究,纳入了爱尔兰和印度的姑息治疗、老年联络精神病学和普通成人联络精神病学环境中的数据。

参与者

1757 名使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准诊断为谵妄的患者。

主要和次要结果

使用简化的谵妄运动亚型量表(Delirium Motor Subtype Scale)识别出高度活跃、混合和低度活跃的谵妄亚型。使用修订后的谵妄评定量表(Delirium Rating Scale Revised)评估表型。使用谵妄病因检查表(Delirium Aetiology Checklist,DEC)评估促成病因,得分>2 表示病因可能或肯定有促成作用。

结果

低度活跃的谵妄与痴呆、脑血管和全身感染病因有关(p<0.001),且整体谵妄症状负担低于其他运动亚型。高度活跃的谵妄与年龄较小、药物戒断和 DEC 其他全身病因类别有关(p<0.001)。混合性谵妄表现出最大的症状负担,且更常与药物中毒和代谢紊乱有关(p<0.001)。所有三种谵妄运动亚型在注意力和视空间功能方面的损害程度相似,但与无亚型相比差异显著(p<0.001)。

结论

这项研究表明,在一个大型国际样本中,谵妄运动亚型存在一种病因和症状模式,这在以前是缺乏的。它有助于提高我们对这种复杂疾病的理解,并对早期发现和管理谵妄具有重要意义。

相似文献

5
Comparison of symptoms of delirium across various motoric subtypes.比较不同运动亚型的谵妄症状。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Apr;68(4):283-91. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12131. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Comparison of symptoms of delirium across various motoric subtypes.比较不同运动亚型的谵妄症状。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Apr;68(4):283-91. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12131. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验