Yan Xu, Zhong Jingyi, Wang Yezheng, Tian Ying, Wang Lijuan, Li Congcong, Liu Kaihang, Zhao Wei, Wang Liyan, Wang Hongbiao
Department of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
School of Physical Education Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 16;16:1528263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528263. eCollection 2025.
This meta-analysis focused on exploring whether ego depletion affects sports performance. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare the magnitude of effect sizes between different ego depletion initiation tasks and which type of sports performance is more susceptible to ego depletion as a moderator variable.
This article was based on Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, Embase, and Cochrane databases for the included articles, and meta-analysis of the included articles was performed using RevMan 5.4 software to evaluate the effect of ego depletion on athletes' sports performance through standardized mean difference.
Eleven articles and 12 studies were finally included. After sensitivity analyses using the Leave-One-Out method, two articles and one experiment were excluded with significant effect sizes. The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes' sports performance SMD = -0.38 [95% CI: -0.56 to -0.21], = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes' sports performance. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that the Stroop task SMD = 0.63 [95% CI: -0.96 to -0.26] produced larger effect sizes than the transcription task SMD = 0.39 [95% CI: -0.64 to -0.13], i.e., the Stroop task was more likely to produce ego depletion in athletes. Targeting sports performance SMD = 0.49 [95% CI: -0.74 to -0.23] produced larger effect sizes than endurance-based sports performance SMD = 0.42 [95% CI: -0.68 to -0.16], i.e., aiming-based sports performance was more affected by ego depletion.
The total effect size produced by ego depletion on athletes' sports performance was decreasing, a moderate effect size, and there may be publication bias. The subgroup analyses showed that the amount of effect produced by different ego depletion initiation tasks was different and the Stroop task was more likely to be produced. Also, the effect sizes affected by ego depletion were different for various types of sports performance, with more pronounced for aiming movements.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024561990.
本荟萃分析旨在探讨自我损耗是否会影响运动表现。进行亚组分析以比较不同自我损耗启动任务之间效应量的大小,以及作为调节变量,哪种类型的运动表现更容易受到自我损耗的影响。
本文基于PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、EBSCO、Embase和Cochrane数据库检索纳入文章,并使用RevMan 5.4软件对纳入文章进行荟萃分析,通过标准化均数差评估自我损耗对运动员运动表现的影响。
最终纳入11篇文章和12项研究。采用逐一剔除法进行敏感性分析后,排除了2篇文章和1项效应量显著的实验。自我损耗对运动员运动表现的最终总效应量SMD = -0.38 [95% CI:-0.56至-0.21],P = 0.001,表明自我损耗会导致运动员运动表现下降。亚组荟萃分析显示,斯特鲁普任务的SMD = 0.63 [95% CI:-0.96至-0.26]产生的效应量大于抄写任务的SMD = 0.39 [95% CI:-0.64至-0.13],即斯特鲁普任务更有可能在运动员中产生自我损耗。目标导向型运动表现的SMD = 0.49 [95% CI:-0.74至-0.23]产生的效应量大于耐力型运动表现的SMD = 0.42 [95% CI:-0.68至-0.16],即目标导向型运动表现受自我损耗的影响更大。
自我损耗对运动员运动表现产生的总效应量呈下降趋势,为中等效应量,且可能存在发表偏倚。亚组分析表明,不同自我损耗启动任务产生的效应量不同,斯特鲁普任务更易产生。此外,自我损耗对不同类型运动表现的效应量也不同,对目标导向动作的影响更为明显。