Zagorska Agnese, Briede Anna, Vasiļjeva Ksenija, Strika Evija, Stokenberga Ieva
Department of Psychology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Personal Ment Health. 2025;19(3):e70028. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70028.
This study examines the psychometric properties of the Latvian adaptation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) and its alignment with the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). A clinical sample (N = 142) and a nonclinical sample (N = 306) were formed. Internal consistency, factor structure, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the scale's psychometric properties. Confirmatory factor analysis compared five structural models: one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, higher order, and bifactor. The bifactor model demonstrated the best fit, capturing both general and subscale-specific variance in personality functioning. Correlation and regression analyses explored associations between the LPFS-SR and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The findings support the Latvian LPFS-SR as a valid and reliable tool for assessing personality functioning and are consistent with the principles of the AMPD.
本研究考察了拉脱维亚语版人格功能水平量表-自我报告(LPFS-SR)的心理测量特性及其与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的一致性。研究组建了一个临床样本(N = 142)和一个非临床样本(N = 306)。通过评估内部一致性、因子结构和效标效度来评价该量表的心理测量特性。验证性因子分析比较了五个结构模型:单因素模型、双因素模型、四因素模型、高阶模型和双因子模型。双因子模型显示出最佳拟合,能够捕捉人格功能中的一般方差和特定子量表方差。相关分析和回归分析探讨了LPFS-SR与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID-5)之间的关联。研究结果支持拉脱维亚语版LPFS-SR作为评估人格功能的有效且可靠工具,并且与AMPD的原则一致。