do Nascimento Glauto Tuquarre Melo, Pereira Irislene Costa, de Oliveira Kynnara Gabriella Feitosa, Santos Álina Mara Carvalho Pedrosa, do Nascimento Maria Luisa Lima Barreto, Porto Jhonatas Cley Santos, Torres-Leal Francisco Leonardo, da Silva Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro, de Oliveira Ferreira José Roberto, Ferreira Paulo Michel Pinheiro, de Castro E Sousa João Marcelo
Laboratory of Research in Toxicological Genetics (Lapgenic), Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, 64049-550, Brazil.
Metabolic Diseases, Exercise and Nutrition Research Group (Domen), Department of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, 64049-550, Brazil.
Med Oncol. 2025 Jul 1;42(8):306. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02849-4.
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) presenting defective mismatch repair (dMMR) and/or high index of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are suitable candidates for immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. However, the use of these ICIs as neoadjuvant treatment for non-metastatic and metastatic CRCs with these specific molecular alterations is still controversial. Thus, this systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021258676) evaluated the benefits, toxicity profile, and clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab and nivolumab as neoadjuvant therapy for CRC with dMMR and/or MSI-H. For this, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct databases were used. Twenty-five case reports and four randomized clinical trials were included, and the main outcomes analyzed were overall survival, progression-free survival, pathological response through RECIST 1.1, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, respectively. In general, the evaluated studies were well conducted according to the assessment tools, and the evidence suggests that combinations of nivolumab plus ipilimumab were more effective to treat metastatic CRC with dMMR and/or MSI-H than nivolumab alone. Regarding pembrolizumab, clinical evidence demonstrated its safety and efficiency for patients with this subtype of CRC in metastatic and locally advanced stages. This review indicates therapeutic promising potential of ICIs for patients with dMMR and/or MSI-H CRCs. Additionally, alterations in PI3K and JAK pathways are important mechanisms of resistance and represent an opportunity for the development of new drugs. Therefore, molecular investigations should be performed to uncover causes of therapeutic failure.
存在错配修复缺陷(dMMR)和/或微卫星高度不稳定(MSI-H)的转移性结直肠癌(CRC)患者是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)免疫治疗的合适候选者,如帕博利珠单抗和纳武利尤单抗。然而,将这些ICI用作具有这些特定分子改变的非转移性和转移性CRC的新辅助治疗仍存在争议。因此,本系统评价(PROSPERO CRD42021258676)评估了帕博利珠单抗和纳武利尤单抗作为dMMR和/或MSI-H CRC新辅助治疗的益处、毒性特征和临床结局。为此,使用了MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和科学Direct数据库。纳入了25篇病例报告和4项随机临床试验,分析的主要结局分别为总生存期、无进展生存期、根据RECIST 1.1标准的病理反应以及东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态。总体而言,根据评估工具,所评估的研究开展良好,证据表明纳武利尤单抗加伊匹木单抗联合治疗dMMR和/或MSI-H的转移性CRC比单独使用纳武利尤单抗更有效。关于帕博利珠单抗,临床证据证明了其对转移性和局部晚期该亚型CRC患者的安全性和有效性。本综述表明ICI对dMMR和/或MSI-H CRC患者具有有前景的治疗潜力。此外,PI3K和JAK通路的改变是重要的耐药机制,也是开发新药的契机。因此,应进行分子研究以揭示治疗失败的原因。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Immunotherapy. 2024
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-1-8
Cancers (Basel). 2025-3-25
Eur J Pharmacol. 2025-3-15
Mol Cancer. 2025-1-15
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2023-3