Dooling Lawrence J, Anlaş Alişya A, Tobin Michael P, Ontko Nicholas M, Marchena Tristan, Wang Maximilian, Andrechak Jason C, Discher Dennis E
Molecular and Cellular Biophysics Lab, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Physical Sciences of Oncology Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2425452122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2425452122. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
Macrophages often pervade solid tumors, and clusters of macrophages sometimes associate with longer survival of patients. However, clustering mechanisms and impacts on key functions such as phagocytosis remain obscure. Here, under conditions that maximize cancer cell phagocytosis within cohesive tumors, we uncover pathways that favor dynamic clusters and find a colocalization of tumor-intrusive pseudopodia which we term "intrudopodia." Cluster formation over hours on low-adhesion substrates occurs after macrophage induction to a state colloquially referred to as M1 after exposure to interferons and T cell-derived cytokines. Clusters prove fluid on timescales of minutes and also sort from interleukin-4-treated, so-called M2 macrophages that tend to disperse. M1 macrophages upregulate specific cell-cell adhesion receptors but suppress actomyosin contractility, with both pathways contributing to cluster formation. Decreased cortical tension was not only reflected in a low level of nuclear lamin-A that downregulates cytoskeletal targets of serum response factor and tends to soften the nucleus but was also predicted to unleash pseudopodia. Macrophage neighbors in tumor spheroids indeed coextend intrudopodia between cancer cell junctions-at least when phagocytosis conditions are maximized. Intrudopodia from neighbors help detach and individualize cancer cells for rapid engulfment. Juxtaposition of a macrophage cluster with tumor cell nests defines a broad interface that minimizes cancer cell nearest neighbor interactions and maximizes coordination of macrophage intrudopodia. Cooperative phagocytosis thus overcomes solid tumor cohesion-and might explain why the macrophage clustering factor associates with patient survival.
巨噬细胞常常浸润实体瘤,巨噬细胞簇有时与患者较长的生存期相关。然而,其簇集机制以及对吞噬作用等关键功能的影响仍不清楚。在此,在使凝聚性肿瘤内癌细胞吞噬作用最大化的条件下,我们发现了有利于动态簇形成的途径,并发现了肿瘤侵入性伪足(我们称之为“侵入伪足”)的共定位现象。在低粘附底物上经过数小时形成的簇,是在巨噬细胞被诱导至一种通俗称为M1的状态后出现的,这种状态是在接触干扰素和T细胞衍生细胞因子后形成的。事实证明,这些簇在数分钟的时间尺度上是动态的,并且也能与倾向于分散分布的、经白细胞介素-4处理的所谓M2巨噬细胞区分开来。M1巨噬细胞上调特定的细胞间粘附受体,但抑制肌动球蛋白收缩力,这两种途径都有助于簇的形成。皮质张力降低不仅表现为核纤层蛋白A水平较低,该蛋白下调血清反应因子的细胞骨架靶点并倾向于使细胞核软化,而且还被预测会释放伪足。肿瘤球体中的巨噬细胞邻居确实会在癌细胞连接处之间共同延伸侵入伪足——至少在吞噬作用条件最大化时是这样。来自邻居的侵入伪足有助于分离并使癌细胞个体化以便快速吞噬。巨噬细胞簇与肿瘤细胞巢的并置定义了一个宽阔的界面,该界面可使癌细胞最近邻相互作用最小化,并使巨噬细胞侵入伪足的协调性最大化。因此,协同吞噬作用克服了实体瘤的凝聚性——这或许可以解释为什么巨噬细胞簇集因子与患者生存期相关。