Suppr超能文献

关于助产士如何在围产期服务中对女性进行创伤筛查和评估的综合综述。

An integrative review of how midwives are screening and assessing for trauma in women within perinatal services.

作者信息

Callanan Fiona, Bradshaw Carmel, Tuohy Teresa, Noonan Maria, Murphy Sylvia, Grealish Annmarie

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

University Maternity Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0327253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327253. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a growing body of literature on the significance of trauma and abuse in the perinatal period but despite this, trauma exposure and abuse are often not recognised in maternity care settings. Evidence indicates that women experiencing mental distress during the perinatal period are frequently unidentified or inadequately supported. The purpose of this study was to conduct an integrative review on how midwives screen, assess, and respond to women with trauma histories in the perinatal period and to identify the challenges in providing trauma discussions, screening and assessment.

METHODS

This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework as it facilitates the inclusion of different methodological approaches to experimental research. Five electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ASSIA, and Web of Science), reference and citation lists were systematically searched from inception with no date, language or geographical limiters set owing to a dearth of research in this subject area. This review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The findings were analysed and synthesised using narrative synthesis.

FINDINGS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesised using narrative synthesis. Four main themes were identified: 1) Midwives difficulties in asking and discussing interpersonal trauma and abuse and their instinctive use of their observations skills to elicit information; 2) Screening tools to elicit history of interpersonal trauma; 3) Midwife's response to interpersonal discussions; 4) Training on 'daring to ask the questions' and Support on 'what should I do now'.

DISCUSSION

Our findings demonstrate a deficit in trauma discussion, screening and assessment of trauma within the perinatal care, domestic violence being the exception. Interpersonal trauma is a significant public health concern that if left unrecognized may increase morbidity and mortality in both mothers and newborns. This study makes recommendations for urgent streamlined trauma discussions and specific training and supervision on trauma-informed care for all healthcare professions in their perinatal role using a whole systems approach.

摘要

引言

关于围产期创伤和虐待的重要性,相关文献越来越多,但尽管如此,在产科护理环境中,创伤暴露和虐待情况往往未得到识别。有证据表明,围产期经历精神困扰的女性常常未被识别或得到的支持不足。本研究的目的是对助产士如何筛查、评估围产期有创伤史的女性以及如何应对她们进行综合综述,并确定在进行创伤讨论、筛查和评估时所面临的挑战。

方法

本综合综述遵循惠特莫尔和克纳夫的五阶段框架,因为该框架有助于纳入不同的实验研究方法。系统检索了五个电子数据库(心理学文摘数据库、医学索引数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、应用社会科学索引与摘要数据库和科学引文索引数据库)、参考文献列表和引文列表,由于该主题领域研究匮乏,检索从起始日期开始,未设置日期、语言或地理限制。本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行实施和报告。研究结果采用叙述性综合分析方法进行分析和综合。

结果

22项研究符合纳入标准,并采用叙述性综合分析方法进行了综合。确定了四个主要主题:1)助产士在询问和讨论人际创伤及虐待方面存在困难,以及她们本能地运用观察技能获取信息;2)用于引出人际创伤史的筛查工具;3)助产士对人际讨论的反应;4)关于“敢于提问”的培训以及关于“我现在该怎么做”的支持。

讨论

我们的研究结果表明,围产期护理中创伤讨论、筛查和评估存在不足,家庭暴力情况除外。人际创伤是一个重大的公共卫生问题,如果未被识别,可能会增加母亲和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。本研究建议,采用全系统方法,对所有从事围产期工作的医疗专业人员进行紧急简化的创伤讨论以及关于创伤知情护理的特定培训和监督。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ed5/12212512/6d02ca3d717c/pone.0327253.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验