Li Xinyang, Liu Yingying, Zhu Xueyan, Jin Hua, Zhang Xiaoxuan, Wang Lei, Cui Yingchun, Xu Feng, Wang Yangwei, Song Yanyan, Cui Wenpeng
Division of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Division of Nephrology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06046-1.
To observe the efficacy and safety of Ripertamab in the treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (IMN). Clinical data from patients with IMN treated with Ripertamab or Rituximab were retrospectively collected from six tertiary hospitals in Jilin Province between January and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on treatment regimen into the Ripertamab and Rituximab groups and matched 1:1 by age and gender. Follow-ups were conducted over six months to assess baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, and adverse reactions related to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy. A total of 112 patients with IMN were identified, including 52 treated with Ripertamab and 60 with Rituximab. After matching, 40 patients were included in each group. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months, the overall effectiveness rate of Ripertamab in the treatment of IMN was 65.0%, of which the partial and complete remission rates were 50.0% and 15.0%, respectively. The overall effectiveness rate of Rituximab was 60.0%, of which the partial and complete remission rates were 47.5% and 12.5%, respectively. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the incidence of infusion reactions, pulmonary infections, interstitial lung disease, HBV reactivation, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia (P > 0.05). Ripertamab demonstrates a therapeutic efficacy comparable to Rituximab for IMN, with a similar incidence of infusion-related adverse reactions and complications.
观察利妥昔单抗治疗特发性膜性肾病(IMN)的疗效和安全性。回顾性收集2023年1月至12月间吉林省6家三级医院接受利妥昔单抗或利妥昔单抗治疗的IMN患者的临床资料。根据治疗方案将患者分为利妥昔单抗组和利妥昔单抗组,并按年龄和性别1:1匹配。随访6个月,评估基线特征、实验室参数以及与抗CD20单克隆抗体治疗相关的不良反应。共确定112例IMN患者,其中52例接受利妥昔单抗治疗,60例接受利妥昔单抗治疗。匹配后,每组纳入40例患者。两组间基线临床特征具有可比性(P>0.05)。两组疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。6个月时,利妥昔单抗治疗IMN的总有效率为65.0%,其中部分缓解率和完全缓解率分别为50.0%和15.0%。利妥昔单抗的总有效率为60.0%,其中部分缓解率和完全缓解率分别为47.5%和12.5%。同样,在输液反应、肺部感染、间质性肺病、HBV再激活、中性粒细胞减少或血小板减少的发生率方面也无显著差异(P>0.05)。利妥昔单抗治疗IMN的疗效与利妥昔单抗相当,输液相关不良反应和并发症的发生率相似。