• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过血流动力学和几何分析预测颈动脉分叉手术后的长期再狭窄风险。

Prediction of Long Term Restenosis Risk After Surgery in the Carotid Bifurcation by Hemodynamic and Geometric Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Unità Operativa di Chirurgia Vascolare, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr;47(4):1129-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02201-8. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10439-019-02201-8
PMID:30659434
Abstract

This study explored the potential of hemodynamic disturbances and geometric features to predict long-term carotid restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Thirteen CEA for carotid diameter stenosis > 70% were performed with patch graft (PG) angioplasty in nine cases, and primary closure (PC) in four cases. MRI acquisitions within one month after CEA were used for hemodynamic and geometric characterization. Personalized computational hemodynamic simulations quantified the exposure to low and oscillatory wall shear stress (WSS). Geometry was characterized in terms of flare (the expansion at the bulb) and tortuosity. At 60 months after CEA, Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was applied for restenosis detection and intima-media thickness determination. Larger flares were associated to larger exposure to low WSS (Pearson R values up to 0.38, P < 0.05). The two cases characterized by the highest flare and the largest low WSS exposure developed restenosis > 50% at 60 months. Linear regressions revealed associations of DUS observations of thickening with flare variables (up to R= 0.84, P < 0.001), and the exposure to low (but not oscillatory) WSS (R= 0.58, P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that arteriotomy repair should avoid a large widening of the carotid bulb, which is linked to restenosis via the generation of flow disturbances. Hemodynamics and geometry-based analyses hold potential for (1) preoperative planning, guiding the PG vs. PC clinical decision, and (2) stratifying long-term restenosis risk after CEA.

摘要

本研究探讨了血流动力学紊乱和几何特征在预测颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后颈动脉再狭窄的长期预后中的潜力。对 13 例颈动脉直径狭窄>70%的患者进行了 CEA,其中 9 例采用补片血管成形术(PG),4 例采用直接缝合(PC)。CEA 后一个月内进行 MRI 采集,用于血流动力学和几何特征分析。个体化计算血流动力学模拟量化了低壁切应力(WSS)和振荡壁切应力的暴露程度。几何特征采用膨大部扩张(flare)和迂曲度来描述。CEA 后 60 个月,应用多普勒超声(DUS)检测再狭窄并测量内膜中层厚度。较大的膨大部扩张与低壁切应力暴露程度较大有关(Pearson R 值高达 0.38,P<0.05)。两个膨大部扩张最大、低壁切应力暴露最大的病例在 60 个月时发展为再狭窄>50%。线性回归分析显示,DUS 观察到的增厚与膨大部扩张变量之间存在相关性(最高 R 值为 0.84,P<0.001),以及与低壁切应力(但非振荡壁切应力)暴露之间存在相关性(R=0.58,P<0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,动脉切开修复应避免颈动脉膨大部过度扩张,这会通过产生血流紊乱导致再狭窄。基于血流动力学和几何特征的分析具有(1)术前规划,指导 PG 与 PC 临床决策,以及(2)分层 CEA 后长期再狭窄风险的潜力。

相似文献

1
Prediction of Long Term Restenosis Risk After Surgery in the Carotid Bifurcation by Hemodynamic and Geometric Analysis.通过血流动力学和几何分析预测颈动脉分叉手术后的长期再狭窄风险。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr;47(4):1129-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02201-8. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
2
Wall Shear Stress Topological Skeleton Independently Predicts Long-Term Restenosis After Carotid Bifurcation Endarterectomy.壁切应力拓扑骨架独立预测颈动脉分叉内膜切除术(CEA)后远期再狭窄。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;48(12):2936-2949. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02607-9. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
3
Patient-specific Hemodynamics of Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Before and After Endarterectomy Examined by 4D Flow MRI.采用 4D 流 MRI 检查颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术前后的特定患者血液动力学。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 6;9(1):18554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54543-x.
4
Computational fluid dynamic comparison between patch-based and primary closure techniques after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后面补丁式和原发缝合技术的计算流体动力学比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):887-897. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.094. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
5
Computational Fluid-Dynamic Analysis after Carotid Endarterectomy: Patch Graft versus Direct Suture Closure.颈动脉内膜切除术后的计算流体动力学分析:补片移植与直接缝合关闭术对比
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:325-335. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients.颈动脉几何形状对壁面剪应力梯度大小及分布的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Apr;23(4):667-78. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80048-6.
7
Effects of carotid artery stenting on arterial geometry.颈动脉支架置入术对动脉几何结构的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Aug;217(2):251-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 May 19.
8
The hemodynamic effects of in-tandem carotid artery stenosis: implications for carotid endarterectomy.串联性颈动脉狭窄的血液动力学效应:对颈动脉内膜切除术的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Mar;19(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.03.014.
9
Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的缝合技术会影响局部血流动力学。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):418-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.069. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
10
Carotid geometry is an independent predictor of wall thickness - a 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance study in patients with high cardiovascular risk.颈动脉几何形态是管壁厚度的独立预测因子——一项针对高心血管风险患者的 3D 心血管磁共振研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Sep 10;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00657-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of stenosis treatment on the hemodynamic crosstalk between carotid arteries.狭窄治疗对颈动脉之间血流动力学串扰的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05466-3.
2
Modeling Hemodynamic Effects of the Closure Procedure of Carotid Artery Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术闭合过程血流动力学效应的建模
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2025 May;41(5):e70048. doi: 10.1002/cnm.70048.
3
The effects of carotid plaque classification and bifurcation angle on plaque: a computational fluid dynamics simulation.

本文引用的文献

1
Segment-specific associations between local haemodynamic and imaging markers of early atherosclerosis at the carotid artery: an human study.颈动脉早期动脉粥样硬化局部血液动力学和影像学标志物的节段特异性相关性:一项人体研究。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Oct 10;15(147):20180352. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0352.
2
Invited commentary.特邀评论
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):897-898. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.013.
3
Computational fluid dynamic comparison between patch-based and primary closure techniques after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后面补丁式和原发缝合技术的计算流体动力学比较。
颈动脉斑块分类及分叉角度对斑块的影响:计算流体动力学模拟
Front Physiol. 2025 Mar 21;16:1509875. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1509875. eCollection 2025.
4
The hemodynamic and geometric characteristics of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque formation.颈动脉粥样硬化斑块形成的血流动力学和几何特征。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):4348-4361. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1827. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
5
Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity.螺旋中心线支架与直支架置入对血流速度的影响。
Front Med Technol. 2023 Jun 2;5:1196125. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125. eCollection 2023.
6
Interplay between Artificial Intelligence and Biomechanics Modeling in the Cardiovascular Disease Prediction.人工智能与生物力学建模在心血管疾病预测中的相互作用。
Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 1;10(9):2157. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092157.
7
Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术。
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2022;44:187-207. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87649-4_10.
8
Carotid Geometry and Wall Shear Stress Independently Predict Increased Wall Thickness-A Longitudinal 3D MRI Study in High-Risk Patients.颈动脉几何形态和壁面切应力可独立预测管壁厚度增加——一项针对高危患者的纵向三维磁共振成像研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 26;8:723860. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.723860. eCollection 2021.
9
The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.颈动脉再狭窄的管理:一项全面综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1272. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-963.
10
Wall Shear Stress Topological Skeleton Independently Predicts Long-Term Restenosis After Carotid Bifurcation Endarterectomy.壁切应力拓扑骨架独立预测颈动脉分叉内膜切除术(CEA)后远期再狭窄。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;48(12):2936-2949. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02607-9. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):887-897. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.094. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
5
Cardiovascular morphometry with high-resolution 3D magnetic resonance: First application to left ventricle diastolic dysfunction.心脏血管形态计量学的高分辨率 3D 磁共振:首次应用于左心室舒张功能障碍。
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Sep;47:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Computational Fluid-Dynamic Analysis after Carotid Endarterectomy: Patch Graft versus Direct Suture Closure.颈动脉内膜切除术后的计算流体动力学分析:补片移植与直接缝合关闭术对比
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:325-335. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Restenosis after Carotid Interventions and Its Relationship with Recurrent Ipsilateral Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.颈动脉介入术后再狭窄及其与同侧复发性卒中的关系:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;53(6):766-775. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
8
Oscillatory wall shear stress is a dominant flow characteristic affecting lesion progression patterns and plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease.振荡壁面剪应力是影响冠心病患者病变进展模式和斑块易损性的主要血流特征。
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Feb;14(127). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0972.
9
Insights into the co-localization of magnitude-based versus direction-based indicators of disturbed shear at the carotid bifurcation.关于颈动脉分叉处基于幅度与基于方向的剪切力紊乱指标共定位的见解。
J Biomech. 2016 Aug 16;49(12):2413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Atherosclerosis at arterial bifurcations: evidence for the role of haemodynamics and geometry.动脉分叉处的动脉粥样硬化:血流动力学和几何形状作用的证据。
Thromb Haemost. 2016 Mar;115(3):484-92. doi: 10.1160/TH15-07-0597. Epub 2016 Jan 7.