Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与美索比妥用于电休克治疗的比较:对治疗效果和不良反应的影响。一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析

Propofol Versus Methohexital in Electroconvulsive Therapy: Impact on Treatment Efficacy and Adverse Effects. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Huoponen Saara H, Sisa Katrin, Saari Tom, Taittonen Markku, Ahlmén-Laiho Ulla

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Aug;69(7):e70083. doi: 10.1111/aas.70083.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a widely used treatment for depression, but the choice of the anesthetic that is used for induction may affect both clinical outcomes and the occurrence of adverse effects (AEs). Propofol and methohexital are frequently used in Finland, yet their relative impact on treatment efficacy and AEs remains uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases were searched up to January 21, 2025. Studies comparing propofol and methohexital in adult patients receiving ECT for depression and utilizing numeric scales for depression assessment were included. The primary outcome was the clinical treatment response, defined by the number of ECT sessions required to achieve remission. The secondary outcome was the variation of AEs associated with ECT between comparator groups. We included eight studies in the final analysis with 194 patients in the propofol group and 198 patients in the methohexital group. Five of the studies were randomized controlled trials and three were retrospective cohort studies. Three randomized controlled trials with 131 patients: 62 (47%) in propofol group and 69 (53%) in methohexital group were included in meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The number of ECT sessions required for recovery did not differ between groups. All studies demonstrated effective alleviation of depression through ECT, regardless of anesthetic choice. However, AEs were inconsistently reported, and a comprehensive overview of the topic was not possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence suggests equal efficacy of propofol compared to methohexital with regard to clinical remission of depression after ECT.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Trial Registration: PROSPERO; CRD42024520709.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

This systematic review and meta-analysis presents the available but limited and low-quality evidence in this study area, and supports an interpretation that propofol and methohexital have similar efficacy when facilitating electroconfulsive therapy as treatment for depression, to relieve depression symptoms.

摘要

背景

电休克疗法(ECT)是一种广泛应用于治疗抑郁症的方法,但诱导时所用麻醉剂的选择可能会影响临床疗效和不良反应(AE)的发生。丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥在芬兰经常使用,但其对治疗效果和不良反应的相对影响仍不确定。

方法

我们按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统的文献综述和Meta分析。检索电子数据库至2025年1月21日。纳入比较丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥在接受ECT治疗抑郁症的成年患者中的应用,并使用数字量表进行抑郁评估的研究。主要结局是临床治疗反应,定义为达到缓解所需的ECT疗程数。次要结局是比较组之间与ECT相关的AE的差异。最终分析纳入了8项研究,丙泊酚组194例患者,甲己炔巴比妥组198例患者。其中5项研究为随机对照试验,3项为回顾性队列研究。三项随机对照试验共131例患者:丙泊酚组62例(47%),甲己炔巴比妥组69例(53%)纳入Meta分析。

结果

两组恢复所需的ECT疗程数无差异。所有研究均表明,无论麻醉剂选择如何,ECT均可有效缓解抑郁症状。然而,关于AE的报告并不一致,无法对该主题进行全面概述。

结论

低质量证据表明,在ECT后抑郁症的临床缓解方面,丙泊酚与甲己炔巴比妥的疗效相当。

系统评价注册

试验注册:PROSPERO;CRD42024520709。

编辑评论

这项系统综述和Meta分析展示了该研究领域现有的但有限且质量较低的证据,并支持这样一种解释,即丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥在促进电休克疗法作为抑郁症治疗手段以缓解抑郁症状方面具有相似的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验