文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经胆囊与经胆管腹腔镜胆总管探查术的比较临床结局:一项回顾性研究

Comparative clinical outcomes of transcystic vs. transductal laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Yang Xing-Guang, Hu Ming, Sun Wei-Feng, Zhang Tian-Liang, Yang Ji-Wu, Zhao Hui-Qiong

机构信息

Department of General Surgery II, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, No. 32 of Jiashibo Avenue, Dali, Yunnan, 671000, China.

Department of Pain, The First People's Hospital of Dali, No. 36 of Tai'an Road, Dali, Yunnan, 671000, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04063-y.


DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-04063-y
PMID:40596948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12210935/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the therapeutic outcomes of transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (TC-LCBDE) and transductive laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (TD-LCBDE) for the treatment of common bile duct stones accompanied by gallstones. METHODS: A cohort of 102 patients with common bile duct stones accompanied by gallstones, admitted between April 2016 and February 2025, were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the surgical approach, the patients were divided into Group A (TC-Group, n = 51) and Group B (TD-Group, n = 51). Group A underwent TC-LCBDE, while Group B underwent TD-LCBDE. Key parameters were statistically analyzed, including operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative length of stay, average hospitalization cost, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, and the incidence of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Group A had a shorter postoperative length of stay compared to Group B (P < 0.05). The total hospitalization cost in Group A was also lower than that in Group B (P < 0.05). Additionally, the postoperative drainage tube indwelling time was shorter in Group A, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TC-LCBDE is an optimal surgical approach for treating common bile duct stones with concomitant gallstones, offering faster postoperative recovery, lower hospitalization costs, shorter hospital stays, and reduced drainage tube indwelling time. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较经胆囊腹腔镜胆总管探查术(TC-LCBDE)和经导管腹腔镜胆总管探查术(TD-LCBDE)治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的疗效。 方法:回顾性分析2016年4月至2025年2月收治的102例胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者。根据手术方式,将患者分为A组(TC组,n = 51)和B组(TD组,n = 51)。A组行TC-LCBDE,B组行TD-LCBDE。对手术时间术中出血量、术后住院时间、平均住院费用、术后引流管留置时间及术后并发症发生率等关键参数进行统计学分析。 结果:A组术后住院时间较B组短(P < 0.05)。A组总住院费用也低于B组(P < 0.05)。此外,A组术后引流管留置时间较短,两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论:TC-LCBDE是治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者的一种最佳手术方式,术后恢复更快、住院费用更低、住院时间更短且引流管留置时间缩短。 临床试验编号:不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/c549957a9967/12876_2025_4063_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/55ee744fa901/12876_2025_4063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/66f97b3eff48/12876_2025_4063_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/7c05bcb70422/12876_2025_4063_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/0d0ee19dccf3/12876_2025_4063_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/bbc1455655e5/12876_2025_4063_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/c549957a9967/12876_2025_4063_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/55ee744fa901/12876_2025_4063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/66f97b3eff48/12876_2025_4063_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/7c05bcb70422/12876_2025_4063_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/0d0ee19dccf3/12876_2025_4063_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/bbc1455655e5/12876_2025_4063_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfb0/12210935/c549957a9967/12876_2025_4063_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparative clinical outcomes of transcystic vs. transductal laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a retrospective study.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2025-7-1

[2]
Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: a retrospective cohort study.

Updates Surg. 2023-6

[3]
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-12-12

[4]
Comparison of the efficacy of laparoscopic primary closure of the common bile duct and T-tube drainage in the treatment of choledocholithiasis in elderly patients.

BMC Geriatr. 2025-7-28

[5]
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-9-3

[6]
Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Surg Endosc. 2016-3

[7]
Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-11

[8]
[Laparoscopic modified transcystic biliary drainage for the treatment of biliary stones and diagnosis of biliary disease].

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025-8-18

[9]
Is the end of the T-tube drainage era in laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones is coming? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann Surg. 2013-1

[10]
Primary Closure Versus T-Tube Drainage on Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Five-Year Experience with Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023-3

[2]
Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in patients with a nondilated common bile duct.

Ann Palliat Med. 2021-12

[3]
Transductal versus transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: an institutional review of over four hundred cases.

Surg Endosc. 2021-1

[4]
Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018-8-16

[5]
Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Dig Endosc. 2018-1-18

[6]
Sphincter of Oddi Function and Risk Factors for Dysfunction.

Front Nutr. 2017-1-30

[7]
Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration: Advantages over Laparoscopic Choledochotomy.

PLoS One. 2016-9-26

[8]
The role of ERCP in benign diseases of the biliary tract.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015-4

[9]
Comparison between intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy for ductal clearance in laparoscopic CBD exploration: a prospective randomized study.

Surg Endosc. 2015-5

[10]
Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review.

World J Surg. 2014-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索