Ejlertsson G, Berg S
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1985 May;3(2):79-85. doi: 10.3109/02813438509013921.
With the aid of a continuity index (K), ranged from 0 to 100% and previously described, a comparison has been made in a primary care district before and after the opening of a new health care centre. An organization with health care teams seems to have contributed to a considerable improvement in continuity. The K index increased from 28 to 69% for scheduled and acute visits taken together. About 90% of the visits to the ordinary district physicians were made by people living in the "correct" geographical area. The corresponding figure as regards visits to the district nurse and nurse was 97%. When the service time at a health centre, not organised with health care teams, was expanded and the number of physicians increased, the K index rose from 43 to 54%. When three positions as full-time physicians were divided into six half-time, the K index dropped from 53% to 42%. In order to assess the K index, it was compared to three other measures (UPC, COC and SECON). They all tended to give fairly similar results when applied to empirical data, although the K index required less detailed data to compute. Therefore, the K index can be considered to be a worthwhile measure to use, when analyzing the effects of organizational changes.
借助连续性指数(K)(范围为0至100%,此前已有描述),在一个初级保健区新的医疗中心开业前后进行了比较。一个拥有医疗团队的组织似乎对连续性的显著改善做出了贡献。综合计划就诊和急症就诊来看,K指数从28%提高到了69%。普通地区医生约90%的就诊是由居住在“正确”地理区域的人进行的。地区护士和护师的相应比例为97%。当一个未组建医疗团队的健康中心的服务时间延长且医生数量增加时,K指数从43%升至54%。当三个全职医生职位分为六个兼职职位时,K指数从53%降至42%。为了评估K指数,将其与其他三项指标(UPC、COC和SECON)进行了比较。尽管计算K指数所需的数据细节较少,但在应用于实证数据时,它们往往给出相当相似的结果。因此,在分析组织变革的影响时,K指数可被视为一项值得采用的指标。