Suppr超能文献

瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚对老年外科手术患者术后谵妄影响的比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and propofol on postoperative delirium in elderly surgical patients: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Huang Jiayu, Xiao Zhenke, Lao Junming, Pan Lingli, Chen Zhou, Lin Zehua

机构信息

The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510130, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03197-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of remimazolam compared to propofol in preventing postoperative delirium among elderly surgical patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, CNKI, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Wangfang, and VIP for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing remimazolam and propofol for postoperative delirium prevention in elderly surgical patients (last search: July 27, 2024). Data were analyzed using Stata 15.0.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials (2,013 participants; remimazolam = 1,034, propofol = 979) found no significant differences in postoperative delirium incidence [RR = 0.67,95%CI(0.45–1.01)], severity [WMD=-0.28,95%CI(-0.61-0.04)], or duration [WMD=-0.06,95%CI(-0.15-0.03)], nor in postoperative pain VAS scores [WMD=-0.08,95%CI(-0.18-0.02)]. remimazolam significantly reduced postoperative hypotension risk compared to propofol [RR = 0.48,95%CI(0.29–0.80)], demonstrating improved safety.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates comparable efficacy between remimazolam and propofol in preventing postoperative delirium, with remimazolam demonstrating superior safety through significantly lower postoperative hypotension rates.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-025-03197-6.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析评估了瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚相比,在预防老年外科手术患者术后谵妄方面的有效性。

方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、中国知网、考克兰图书馆、科学网、Embase、万方和维普,以查找比较瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚预防老年外科手术患者术后谵妄的随机对照试验(RCT)(最后检索时间:2024年7月27日)。使用Stata 15.0进行数据分析。

结果

八项随机对照试验(2013名参与者;瑞马唑仑=1034,丙泊酚=979)发现,术后谵妄发生率[RR=0.67,95%CI(0.45-1.01)]、严重程度[WMD=-0.28,95%CI(-0.61-0.04)]或持续时间[WMD=-0.06,95%CI(-0.15-0.03)]均无显著差异,术后疼痛视觉模拟量表评分[WMD=-0.08,95%CI(-0.18-0.02)]也无显著差异。与丙泊酚相比,瑞马唑仑显著降低了术后低血压风险[RR=0.48,95%CI(0.29-0.80)],表明安全性有所提高。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚在预防术后谵妄方面疗效相当,瑞马唑仑通过显著降低术后低血压发生率显示出更高的安全性。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12871-025-03197-6获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a93/12220280/797418238a5f/12871_2025_3197_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验