• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of food-drug interaction knowledge among Turkish healthcare professionals.土耳其医疗保健专业人员对食物-药物相互作用知识的评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07518-8.
2
Cypriot Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge and Skills When Interacting With Patients With Aphasia in Clinical Settings.塞浦路斯医疗保健专业人员在临床环境中与失语症患者互动时的知识和技能。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70089. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70089.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Medication error reporting system: barriers and challenging issues among HCPs in Saudi Arabia - a cross-sectional study.用药错误报告系统:沙特阿拉伯医疗保健人员面临的障碍和挑战性问题——一项横断面研究
Hosp Pract (1995). 2025 Feb;53(1):2520745. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2025.2520745. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
5
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Understanding factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.理解影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施医学风险沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
8
Pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward preventing congenital disabilities: a cross sectional study in Saudi Arabia.药剂师对预防先天性残疾的知识、态度和实践:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13098-6.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Embracing pharmacists' roles in health-care delivery.认可药剂师在医疗服务提供中的作用。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Sep 24;46:101088. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101088. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Awareness of Food and Drug Interactions (FDI) Among Nurses on General Medical Wards: A Cross-Sectional Study.综合内科病房护士对食物与药物相互作用(FDI)的知识、态度及认知:一项横断面研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;10:23779608241280847. doi: 10.1177/23779608241280847. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Food-drug interactions risk management: An emergent piece of pharmacovigilance systems.食品-药物相互作用风险管理:药物警戒系统的一个新领域。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Aug;12(4):e1245. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1245.
4
Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) on food-drug interaction (FDI) among pharmacists working in government health facilities in Sabah, Malaysia.马来西亚沙巴州政府医疗机构药师对药物-食物相互作用(FDI)的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0304974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304974. eCollection 2024.
5
An Algorithm of Nonparametric Quantile Regression.一种非参数分位数回归算法。
J Stat Theory Pract. 2023;17(2):32. doi: 10.1007/s42519-023-00325-8. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
6
Knowledge of Drug-Food Interactions Among Healthcare Professionals Working in Public Hospitals in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚公立医院医护人员对药物与食物相互作用的了解。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Nov 15;15:2635-2645. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S389068. eCollection 2022.
7
Assessment of knowledge of drug-food interactions among healthcare professionals in public sector hospitals in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal.评估夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省埃滕哈赫市公立医疗机构医疗专业人员对药物-食物相互作用的认知。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 3;16(11):e0259402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259402. eCollection 2021.
8
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of healthcare professionals regarding drug-food interactions: a scoping review.医护专业人员对药物-食物相互作用的知识、态度和实践:范围综述。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct 18;29(5):406-415. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riab049.
9
Reversing vitamin K antagonists: making the old new again.逆转维生素K拮抗剂:让旧药焕新颜。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016 Dec 2;2016(1):605-611. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.605.
10
Drug and nutrition interactions: not just food for thought.药物与营养相互作用:不仅仅是思考的食物。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Aug;38(4):269-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12075. Epub 2013 May 27.

土耳其医疗保健专业人员对食物-药物相互作用知识的评估。

Assessment of food-drug interaction knowledge among Turkish healthcare professionals.

作者信息

Balaban Ugur, Balaban Tuba Yildiz, Cakir Burcu Kelleci

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Occupational and Environmental Diseases Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07518-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07518-8
PMID:40597950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211154/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food-drug interactions (FDIs) can affect drug efficacy and patient safety, potentially leading to therapeutic failures or adverse events. Despite their clinical relevance, FDIs are often overlooked in practice. This study aimed to assess FDI knowledge among Turkish healthcare professionals (HCPs) and identify factors associated with knowledge proficiency.

METHODS

A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted between February and March 2025 among HCPs, including pharmacists, physicians, nurses, and other allied HCPs. FDI knowledge was assessed using a validated 21-item scale, with scores categorized as low (0-5), moderate (6-10), good (11-15), and very good (16-21). Multivariable quantile regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with higher FDI knowledge scores.

RESULTS

A total of 418 HCPs participated, with a median FDI knowledge score of 13 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7) out of 21. Pharmacists had the highest median score of 15 (5), followed by physicians with 12 (6), nurses with 10 (7), and other allied HCPs with 10 (6) (p < 0.001). Level of knowledge varied significantly across professions, with 25.4% of participants categorized as "very good," 36.4% as "good," 29.2% as "moderate," and 9.1% as "low." Multivariable regression identified profession and higher education level as significant predictors of FDI knowledge. Pharmacists had significantly higher scores across all percentiles (p < 0.001). HCPs with a doctorate or equivalent specialty demonstrated significantly higher scores at the 25th (p = 0.011), 50th (p < 0.001), and 75th (p = 0.008) percentiles. Similarly, those with a master's degree had significantly higher scores at the median percentile (p < 0.001). Sex, age, and years of professional experience were not significant determinants (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals substantial variability in FDI knowledge among HCPs, with pharmacists demonstrating the highest proficiency. However, critical knowledge gaps remain across all professional groups. Addressing these gaps is critical for optimizing pharmacotherapy and ensuring patient safety. Given the risks of unrecognized FDIs, structured educational interventions are urgently needed to improve clinical decision-making and reduce preventable potential FDIs related to adverse events.

摘要

背景

食物-药物相互作用(FDIs)会影响药物疗效和患者安全,可能导致治疗失败或不良事件。尽管其具有临床相关性,但在实际操作中,FDIs常常被忽视。本研究旨在评估土耳其医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对FDIs的知识掌握情况,并确定与知识水平相关的因素。

方法

于2025年2月至3月间,对包括药剂师、医生、护士及其他相关医疗保健专业人员在内的HCPs开展了一项基于网络的横断面调查。使用经过验证的21项量表评估FDIs知识,分数分为低(0 - 5分)、中(6 - 10分)、良好(11 - 15分)和非常好(16 - 21分)。进行多变量分位数回归分析以确定与较高FDIs知识得分相关的因素。

结果

共有418名HCPs参与,21分制下FDIs知识得分中位数为13分(四分位间距[IQR]:7分)。药剂师得分中位数最高,为15分(5分),其次是医生,为12分(6分),护士为10分(7分),其他相关医疗保健专业人员为10分(6分)(p < 0.001)。不同职业的知识水平差异显著,25.4%的参与者被归类为“非常好”,36.4%为“良好”,29.2%为“中等”,9.1%为“低”。多变量回归分析确定职业和高等教育水平是FDIs知识的重要预测因素。药剂师在所有百分位数上得分均显著更高(p < 0.001)。拥有博士学位或同等专业学位的HCPs在第25百分位数(p = 0.011)、第50百分位数(p < 0.001)和第75百分位数(p = 0.008)得分显著更高。同样,拥有硕士学位的人员在中位数百分位数上得分显著更高(p < 0.001)。性别、年龄和专业经验年限不是显著的决定因素(p > 0.05)。

结论

本研究揭示了HCPs对FDIs知识的显著差异,药剂师表现出最高的水平。然而,所有专业群体中仍存在关键的知识差距。弥补这些差距对于优化药物治疗和确保患者安全至关重要。鉴于未被识别的FDIs存在风险,迫切需要开展结构化教育干预,以改善临床决策并减少与不良事件相关的可预防的潜在FDIs。