Suppr超能文献

医生作为研究参与者——这对他们有什么好处?一项针对国际医学毕业生的定性研究。

Doctors as research participants - what is in it for them? A qualitative study of international medical graduates.

作者信息

Healey Sunita Joann Rebecca, Fakes Kristy, Malau-Aduli Bunmi S, Nair Balakrishnan R

机构信息

University of Newcastle- School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07468-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Doctors are key players in the healthcare system. Their first-hand experience in the workplace may provide researchers with special insight into health service gaps and solutions. However, doctors are typically time poor with high professional demands. Little is reported about how to best engage doctors in research as participants. International medical graduates (IMGs) are a special cohort of doctors with unique challenges, whose experiences and perceptions have been scarcely voiced within research to date.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study to explore IMG motives of participation in research. The study was conducted in February to April 2024 and comprised of semi-structured individual interviews with IMGs based in Australia. The interviews followed an online national survey which had been conducted the previous year. Recruited interview participants were primarily drawn from participants from the preceding survey who had indicated interest in participation in the follow-up qualitative study, in addition to any participants indicating interest via snowballing. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they were living or working in Australia, with a primary medical qualification from overseas, irrespective of current employment status. Data was audio-recorded and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

IMGs (36) were individually interviewed by telephone (21), teleconference (14) and face-to-face (1). We identified three major themes and four subthemes: (1) Research is considered a safe and trusted tool; 1a) Research provides an opportunity to voice, broadcast and enact change, 1b) Safe and anonymous sharing of personal stories and experiences is therapeutic; (2) Personal relevance and interest motivates participation; 2a) Passion for the research topic drives participation, 2b) Comradery and empathy for peers convicts participants to advocate for others through engagement (3) Respect for Research drives engagement.

CONCLUSION

IMGs have a variety of personal motives for participating in research. Understanding these motives can be useful for researchers seeking to recruit such doctors for research in the future.

摘要

背景

医生是医疗保健系统中的关键角色。他们在工作场所的第一手经验可能会为研究人员提供有关卫生服务差距和解决方案的特殊见解。然而,医生通常时间紧张且专业要求很高。关于如何最好地让医生作为参与者参与研究的报道很少。国际医学毕业生(IMGs)是一类面临独特挑战的特殊医生群体,迄今为止,他们的经历和看法在研究中几乎没有得到表达。

方法

我们进行了一项定性研究,以探讨国际医学毕业生参与研究的动机。该研究于2024年2月至4月进行,包括对澳大利亚的国际医学毕业生进行半结构化的个人访谈。访谈之前进行了一项在线全国性调查。招募的访谈参与者主要来自前一项调查中表示有兴趣参与后续定性研究的参与者,此外还有通过滚雪球方式表示有兴趣的任何参与者。如果参与者在澳大利亚生活或工作,拥有海外初级医学资格,无论其当前就业状况如何,均符合纳入条件。数据进行了录音并进行了主题分析。

结果

对36名国际医学毕业生进行了单独访谈,访谈方式包括电话访谈(21人)、电话会议访谈(14人)和面对面访谈(1人)。我们确定了三个主要主题和四个子主题:(1)研究被视为一种安全且值得信赖的工具;1a)研究提供了表达、宣传和推动变革的机会,1b)安全且匿名地分享个人故事和经历具有治疗作用;(2)个人相关性和兴趣激发参与;2a)对研究主题的热情推动参与,2b)对同行的情谊和同理心促使参与者通过参与为他人发声(3)对研究的尊重推动参与。

结论

国际医学毕业生参与研究有多种个人动机。了解这些动机对于未来寻求招募此类医生参与研究的研究人员可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting international medical graduates-what can be done better? A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 19;20(8):e0330558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330558. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

3
Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 12;13(7):e071992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071992.
4
Lessons learnt from pandemic research with refugee communities.
Public Health Res Pract. 2022 Dec 13;32(4):3242236. doi: 10.17061/phrp3242236.
5
Perceptions of Practicing Physicians and Members of the Public on the Attributes of a "Good Doctor".
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;10(1):73. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010073.
6
Balancing adaptation and innovation for resilience in healthcare - a metasynthesis of narratives.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 31;21(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06592-0.
7
Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;15(6):1295-1309. doi: 10.1177/1745691620927709. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
9
Doctors' experience of becoming patients and its influence on their medical practice: A literature review.
Explore (NY). 2020 May-Jun;16(3):145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
10
Mentorship in Medicine and Other Health Professions.
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):629-637. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1360-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验