Suppr超能文献

谁受到了保护,谁没有?评估长期护理保险制度的影响以及韩国老年人口在医疗利用和成本方面的差异。

Who is protected and who is not? Evaluating the effects of the long-term care insurance system and disparities in healthcare utilization and costs of the South Korean elderly population.

作者信息

Sohn Minsung, Sohn Hojoon, Choi Mankyu

机构信息

Division of Health and Medical Sciences, The Cyber University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12747-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing global interest in investigating the substitutability between long-term care service (LTCS) and medical care use, particularly in countries where elderly medical care use is rapidly increasing. The use of an appropriate LTCS can reduce unnecessary medical utilization and the resulting costs such as those for hospital admission, delayed discharge, and emergency room visits.

METHODS

This study evaluated whether the LTCS has a savings effect on medical use for older adults and whether the effect varies depending on income level, using longitudinal data obtained from an Elderly Cohort Database compiled from 2002 to 2013, which is a sample of 10% of the elderly population in Korea. This study also included 70,437 older adults who participated during the 2002-2007 (pre-policy) and 2009-2013 (post-policy) periods.

RESULTS

The results show that the use of inpatient and long-term care hospitals decreased significantly in LTCS users compared with non-users; additionally, the length of stay and medical costs were lower. However, since the introduction of the system, the use of outpatient and acute care hospitals (ACH) by LTCS users has increased slightly compared with non-users. Low-income LTCS users experienced more cost-sharing in outpatient and ACH than high-income users.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LTCI system could reduce the hospitalization rate for the older adults using LTCS, more attention to middle- and low-income populations is necessary as they may be within the blind spot of security.

摘要

背景

全球对于调查长期护理服务(LTCS)与医疗服务使用之间的可替代性的兴趣日益浓厚,尤其是在老年医疗服务使用迅速增加的国家。使用适当的长期护理服务可以减少不必要的医疗利用以及由此产生的成本,如住院、延迟出院和急诊就诊的费用。

方法

本研究使用从2002年至2013年编制的老年队列数据库中获取的纵向数据,评估长期护理服务是否对老年人的医疗使用具有节省效果,以及该效果是否因收入水平而异,该数据库是韩国10%老年人口的样本。本研究还纳入了在2002 - 2007年(政策实施前)和2009 - 2013年(政策实施后)期间参与的70437名老年人。

结果

结果表明,与未使用长期护理服务的人相比,使用长期护理服务的人的住院和长期护理医院使用显著减少;此外,住院时间和医疗费用更低。然而,自该系统引入以来,与未使用长期护理服务的人相比,使用长期护理服务的人的门诊和急性护理医院(ACH)使用略有增加。低收入长期护理服务使用者在门诊和急性护理医院的费用分担比高收入使用者更多。

结论

尽管长期护理保险(LTCI)系统可以降低使用长期护理服务的老年人的住院率,但有必要更加关注中低收入人群,因为他们可能处于保障的盲点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a778/12210835/dc89beec36f8/12913_2025_12747_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub2.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

2
Self-Rated Health Status Based on the Type of Health Insurance: A Socioeconomic Perspective.
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211028171. doi: 10.1177/00469580211028171.
3
Impact of home-based palliative care on health care costs and hospital use: A systematic review.
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Aug;19(4):474-487. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520001315.
4
A decade of public long-term care insurance in South Korea: Policy lessons for aging countries.
Health Policy. 2021 Jan;125(1):22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
8
The Impact of a Home-Based Palliative Care Program in an Accountable Care Organization.
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jan;20(1):23-28. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0265. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
MORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE: DO DYNAMIC INCENTIVES MATTER?
Rev Econ Stat. 2015 Oct;97(4):725-741. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00518.
10
Impact of Home Hospice Care on Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study in Taiwan.
J Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;19(4):380-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0278. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验