Sohn Minsung, Sohn Hojoon, Choi Mankyu
Division of Health and Medical Sciences, The Cyber University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12747-0.
There is a growing global interest in investigating the substitutability between long-term care service (LTCS) and medical care use, particularly in countries where elderly medical care use is rapidly increasing. The use of an appropriate LTCS can reduce unnecessary medical utilization and the resulting costs such as those for hospital admission, delayed discharge, and emergency room visits.
This study evaluated whether the LTCS has a savings effect on medical use for older adults and whether the effect varies depending on income level, using longitudinal data obtained from an Elderly Cohort Database compiled from 2002 to 2013, which is a sample of 10% of the elderly population in Korea. This study also included 70,437 older adults who participated during the 2002-2007 (pre-policy) and 2009-2013 (post-policy) periods.
The results show that the use of inpatient and long-term care hospitals decreased significantly in LTCS users compared with non-users; additionally, the length of stay and medical costs were lower. However, since the introduction of the system, the use of outpatient and acute care hospitals (ACH) by LTCS users has increased slightly compared with non-users. Low-income LTCS users experienced more cost-sharing in outpatient and ACH than high-income users.
Although LTCI system could reduce the hospitalization rate for the older adults using LTCS, more attention to middle- and low-income populations is necessary as they may be within the blind spot of security.
全球对于调查长期护理服务(LTCS)与医疗服务使用之间的可替代性的兴趣日益浓厚,尤其是在老年医疗服务使用迅速增加的国家。使用适当的长期护理服务可以减少不必要的医疗利用以及由此产生的成本,如住院、延迟出院和急诊就诊的费用。
本研究使用从2002年至2013年编制的老年队列数据库中获取的纵向数据,评估长期护理服务是否对老年人的医疗使用具有节省效果,以及该效果是否因收入水平而异,该数据库是韩国10%老年人口的样本。本研究还纳入了在2002 - 2007年(政策实施前)和2009 - 2013年(政策实施后)期间参与的70437名老年人。
结果表明,与未使用长期护理服务的人相比,使用长期护理服务的人的住院和长期护理医院使用显著减少;此外,住院时间和医疗费用更低。然而,自该系统引入以来,与未使用长期护理服务的人相比,使用长期护理服务的人的门诊和急性护理医院(ACH)使用略有增加。低收入长期护理服务使用者在门诊和急性护理医院的费用分担比高收入使用者更多。
尽管长期护理保险(LTCI)系统可以降低使用长期护理服务的老年人的住院率,但有必要更加关注中低收入人群,因为他们可能处于保障的盲点。