• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康保险中的道德风险:动态激励重要吗?

MORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE: DO DYNAMIC INCENTIVES MATTER?

作者信息

Aron-Dine Aviva, Einav Liran, Finkelstein Amy, Cullen Mark

机构信息

Office of Management and Budget.

Stanford University and NBER.

出版信息

Rev Econ Stat. 2015 Oct;97(4):725-741. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00518.

DOI:10.1162/REST_a_00518
PMID:26769985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4710379/
Abstract

Using data from employer-provided health insurance and Medicare Part D, we investigate whether healthcare utilization responds to the dynamic incentives created by the nonlinear nature of health insurance contracts. We exploit the fact that, because annual coverage usually resets every January, individuals who join a plan later in the year face the same initial ("spot") price of healthcare but a higher expected end-of-year ("future") price. We find a statistically significant response of initial utilization to the future price, rejecting the null that individuals respond only to the spot price. We discuss implications for analysis of moral hazard in health insurance.

摘要

利用雇主提供的医疗保险和医疗保险D部分的数据,我们研究了医疗保健利用率是否对医疗保险合同非线性性质所产生的动态激励做出反应。我们利用这样一个事实,即由于年度保险通常在每年1月重置,当年晚些时候加入计划的个人面临相同的初始(“即期”)医疗保健价格,但预期的年末(“未来”)价格更高。我们发现初始利用率对未来价格有统计学上显著的反应,拒绝了个人仅对即期价格做出反应的原假设。我们讨论了对医疗保险中道德风险分析的影响。

相似文献

1
MORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE: DO DYNAMIC INCENTIVES MATTER?健康保险中的道德风险:动态激励重要吗?
Rev Econ Stat. 2015 Oct;97(4):725-741. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00518.
2
What to expect when you are expecting: Are health care consumers forward-looking?期待什么:医疗保健消费者有前瞻性吗?
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102216. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Disentangling Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in Private Health Insurance.厘清私人医疗保险中的道德风险和逆向选择
J Econom. 2021 May;222(1):141-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
Employer contribution and premium growth in health insurance.雇主在健康保险方面的缴费及保费增长。
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
5
Insurance companies' point of view toward moral hazard incentives.保险公司对道德风险激励措施的看法。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016 Nov 5;9:12. eCollection 2016.
6
A median voter model of health insurance with ex post moral hazard.具有事后道德风险的健康保险中位选民模型。
J Health Econ. 2005 Mar;24(2):407-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.01.004. Epub 2004 Dec 25.
7
Healthcare Demand in the Presence of Discrete Price Changes.存在离散价格变化时的医疗保健需求。
Health Econ. 2015 Sep;24(9):1164-77. doi: 10.1002/hec.3154. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
8
Three years in - changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace.三年来,美国医保市场不断调整计划特色。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3198-3.
9
Implications of health reform for retiree health benefits.医疗改革对退休人员医疗福利的影响。
EBRI Issue Brief. 2010 Jan(338):1-17.
10
Moral Hazard and the Demand for Dental Treatment: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey in Thailand.道德风险与牙科治疗需求:来自泰国全国代表性调查的证据
Int J Dent. 2022 Aug 17;2022:2259038. doi: 10.1155/2022/2259038. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Who is protected and who is not? Evaluating the effects of the long-term care insurance system and disparities in healthcare utilization and costs of the South Korean elderly population.谁受到了保护,谁没有?评估长期护理保险制度的影响以及韩国老年人口在医疗利用和成本方面的差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12747-0.
2
The impact of the urban-rural residents' medical insurance integration on rural residents' out-of-pocket medical costs: based on the deductible, reimbursement rate, and ceiling line.城乡居民医疗保险整合对农村居民医疗自付费用的影响:基于起付线、报销比例和封顶线
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;13:1576978. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1576978. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.医疗保险市场中的逆向选择和惯性:当推动反而有害。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Dec;103(7):2643-82. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.7.2643.
2
THE RESPONSE OF DRUG EXPENDITURE TO NON-LINEAR CONTRACT DESIGN: EVIDENCE FROM MEDICARE PART D.药品支出对非线性合同设计的反应:来自医疗保险D部分的证据。
Q J Econ. 2015 May;130(2):841-899. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv005. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
3
Estimating the Tradeoff Between Risk Protection and Moral Hazard with a Nonlinear Budget Set Model of Health Insurance.
The Effect of Digital Supervision of China Basic Medical Insurance on Out-of-pocket Expenditure: Evidence from Quasi-natural Experiment.
中国基本医疗保险数字化监管对自付支出的影响:来自准自然实验的证据。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241301528. doi: 10.1177/00469580241301528.
4
The Health Costs of Cost Sharing.成本分摊的健康成本。
Q J Econ. 2024 May 3;139(4):2037-2082. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjae015. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap closure on utilization of branded and generic drugs.医疗保险部分 D 覆盖缺口关闭对品牌药和仿制药使用的影响。
Health Econ. 2023 Mar;32(3):639-653. doi: 10.1002/hec.4637. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
When Should There Be Vertical Choice in Health Insurance Markets?健康保险市场何时应存在纵向选择?
Am Econ Rev. 2022 Jan;112(1):304-342. doi: 10.1257/aer.20201073.
7
Disentangling Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in Private Health Insurance.厘清私人医疗保险中的道德风险和逆向选择
J Econom. 2021 May;222(1):141-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Medical insurance and healthcare utilization among the middle-aged and elderly in China: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study 2011, 2013 and 2015.中国中老年人群的医疗保险与医疗利用状况:基于中国健康与养老追踪调查 2011、2013 和 2015 年数据的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05522-w.
9
Ex-post moral hazard in the health insurance market: empirical evidence from German data.医疗保险市场中的事后道德风险:来自德国数据的经验证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;20(9):1317-1333. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01091-w. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
10
Distribution of monetary incentives in health insurance scheme influences acupuncture treatment choices: An experimental study.医疗保险计划中货币激励的分配影响针灸治疗选择:一项实验研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0218154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218154. eCollection 2019.
利用健康保险的非线性预算集模型评估风险保护与道德风险之间的权衡
Int J Ind Organ. 2015 Nov 1;43:122-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.08.001.
4
Selection on Moral Hazard in Health Insurance.医疗保险中的道德风险选择。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Feb;103(1):178-219. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.1.178.
5
The RAND Health Insurance Experiment, three decades later.《兰德健康保险实验 30 年后》
J Econ Perspect. 2013 Winter;27(1):197-222. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.1.197.
6
Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: Evidence from Danish Tax Records.调整成本、企业反应与微观 vs. 宏观劳动力供给弹性:来自丹麦税收记录的证据
Q J Econ. 2011 May 1;126(2):749-804. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr013.
7
Asymmetric information in health insurance: evidence from the National Medical Expenditure Survey.健康保险中的信息不对称:来自国家医疗支出调查的证据。
Rand J Econ. 2001 Autumn;32(3):408-27.
8
The demand for episodes of treatment in the Health Insurance Experiment.健康保险实验中治疗阶段的需求。
J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):337-67. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90020-3.
9
Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.健康保险与医疗需求:来自一项随机试验的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 1987 Jun;77(3):251-77.