• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于中国不断变化的医疗保健需求,开发并验证适用于三级医院护士的中国护理核心能力量表。

Developing and validating the Chinese nursing core competence scale for tertiary hospital nurses based on evolving health care needs in China.

作者信息

Chen Meihan, Li Xiaonan, Wang Aiping, Zhou Baosen

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 79 Chongshan East Road, Huanggu District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

Health Medicine Center, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 5 Guangrong Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03384-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03384-3
PMID:40598261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evolving healthcare paradigms and shifting population health needs necessitate the advancement of nurses' core competencies. Under China's new-era health development strategy, there is an urgent demand to establish a culturally adapted, contemporary competency assessment framework.

METHODS

This three-phase study involved: (1) Constructing a preliminary competency framework through systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews; (2) Refining dimensions via two-round Delphi consultations; (3) Validating the Chinese Nursing Core Competence Scale (CNCCS) with data from 1,415 nurses across seven geographical regions (Nov 2022-May 2023), assessing validity through content/structure/criterion-related validation and reliability via internal consistency/test-retest analysis.

RESULTS

The Delphi process yielded an 8-dimension, 96-item framework. Exploratory factor analysis retained 62 items across 8 factors explaining 76.106% variance. Confirmatory analysis demonstrated good model fit (χ²/df = 3.376, TLI = 0.924, CFI = 0.929, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.078). The scale exhibited acceptable reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.885, ICC = 0.958), meeting psychometric standards.

CONCLUSION

The CNCCS comprises 8 dimensions with 62 items, demonstrating robust reliability and validity. Grounded in China's unique healthcare context while addressing global nursing challenges, this instrument provides a scientific foundation for competency evaluation and tiered training programs, offering insights for worldwide nursing competence system development.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

不断发展的医疗保健模式和不断变化的人群健康需求促使护士核心能力的提升。在中国新时代卫生发展战略下,迫切需要建立一个适应文化、符合当代需求的能力评估框架。

方法

本三阶段研究包括:(1)通过系统文献综述和半结构化访谈构建初步能力框架;(2)通过两轮德尔菲咨询完善维度;(3)用来自七个地理区域的1415名护士的数据(2022年11月至2023年5月)验证中国护理核心能力量表(CNCCS),通过内容/结构/标准相关验证评估效度,通过内部一致性/重测分析评估信度。

结果

德尔菲过程产生了一个包含8个维度、96个条目的框架。探索性因素分析保留了8个因素中的62个条目,解释了76.106%的方差。验证性分析显示模型拟合良好(χ²/df = 3.376,TLI = 0.924,CFI = 0.929,RMSEA = 0.054,SRMR = 0.078)。该量表表现出可接受的信度(Cronbach's α = 0.885,ICC = 0.958),符合心理测量标准。

结论

CNCCS包含8个维度、62个条目,具有较强的信度和效度。该工具基于中国独特的医疗背景,同时应对全球护理挑战,为能力评估和分层培训计划提供了科学依据,为全球护理能力体系发展提供了见解。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ce/12211946/5ac184004f2d/12912_2025_3384_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ce/12211946/c80db48e2a27/12912_2025_3384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ce/12211946/e3c9c15cac17/12912_2025_3384_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ce/12211946/5ac184004f2d/12912_2025_3384_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ce/12211946/c80db48e2a27/12912_2025_3384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ce/12211946/e3c9c15cac17/12912_2025_3384_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ce/12211946/5ac184004f2d/12912_2025_3384_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and validating the Chinese nursing core competence scale for tertiary hospital nurses based on evolving health care needs in China.基于中国不断变化的医疗保健需求,开发并验证适用于三级医院护士的中国护理核心能力量表。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03384-3.
2
Assessing the impact of disaster drills on emergency nurses: development and validation of the Disaster Drills Effectiveness Questionnaire (DDEQ).评估灾难演练对急诊护士的影响:灾难演练有效性问卷(DDEQ)的编制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03364-7.
3
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the nursing informatics competence scale and analysis of influencing factors.护理信息学能力量表中文版的心理测量学验证及影响因素分析
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03441-x.
4
Measuring Managerial, Collegial, and Organizational Aspects Associated With Digital Health Competence in Healthcare Professionals: Validation of the Chinese Version of the DigiComInf Instrument.衡量医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力相关的管理、同事关系和组织方面:DigiComInf工具中文版的验证
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 16;2025:8854459. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8854459. eCollection 2025.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Professional Socialization Scale for Hospital Nurses: A Methodological Study.医院护士专业社会化量表波斯语版本的心理测量学评估:一项方法学研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;11:23779608251345276. doi: 10.1177/23779608251345276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Development of the clinical competency assessment scale in child and adolescent mental health nursing.儿童和青少年心理健康护理临床能力评估量表的编制。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):583-595. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13014. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
7
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
8
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
9
Development and psychometric evaluation of the nurses' competency in patient education scale: a sequential exploratory mixed-method study.护士患者教育能力量表的开发与心理测量学评估:一项序贯探索性混合方法研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07478-z.
10
Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.护士工作方法评估量表:土耳其语版的效度与信度研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):220. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060220.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence Literacy Levels of Perioperative Nurses: The Case of Türkiye.围手术期护士的人工智能素养水平:以土耳其为例。
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70059. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70059.
2
Exploring artificial intelligence literacy and the use of ChatGPT and copilot in instruction on nursing academic report writing.探索人工智能素养以及ChatGPT和Copilot在护理学术报告写作教学中的应用。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Apr;147:106570. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106570. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
3
High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare.
高回报、高风险技术?医疗保健领域人工智能开发的伦理与法律剖析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 15;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01158-1.
4
Exploring the core competencies of clinical nurses in chinese tertiary hospitals: a qualitative content analysis.探索中国三级医院临床护士的核心能力:一项质性内容分析
BMC Nurs. 2023 May 17;22(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01337-2.
5
Developing a reliable and valid competency model for assistant dentists in China.制定中国助理牙医的可靠且有效的胜任力模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02986-0.
6
Development of the competency assessment scale for clinical nursing teachers: Results of a Delphi study and validation.临床护理教师能力评估量表的开发:德尔菲研究和验证结果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jun;101:104876. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104876. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis.探索性因子分析和主成分分析的问题与建议。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):1004-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
8
The development and psychometric validation of a Chinese empathy motivation scale.中文同理心动机量表的编制与心理测量学验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jul;28(13-14):2599-2612. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14846. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
9
Research Pearls: Expert Consensus Based Evidence Using the Delphi Method.研究亮点:基于德尔菲法的专家共识证据。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3278-3282. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.004.
10
The past encounters the future: "old" diagnostic methods to check innovative treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome. Comment on: "Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: from ultrasonography to ultrasound surgery" by Petrover and Richette. Joint Bone Spine 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.11.003.过去与未来的交汇:用“传统”诊断方法检验腕管综合征的创新疗法。评Petrover和Richette所著的《腕管综合征的治疗:从超声检查到超声手术》。《关节与脊柱》2017年https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.11.003
Joint Bone Spine. 2018 Dec;85(6):783-784. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Jul 24.