• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈癌筛查中的质量保证:HPV DNA检测中样本充分性的评估

Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening: Evaluation of Sample Adequacy in HPV DNA Testing.

作者信息

d'Avenia M, Dell'Anno F, Martinelli M, Santomauro L, Njoku R C, Arroyo Mühr L S, Iacobellis M, Cocuzza C E

机构信息

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

UOSVD Cytopathology and Screening Laboratory, ASL BARI, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2025 Jul;97(7):e70482. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70482.

DOI:10.1002/jmv.70482
PMID:40600419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12216795/
Abstract

In HPV-primary screening, sample quality significantly influences test accuracy. Unlike cytology-based screening, no consensus guidelines presently exist for sample quality assessment in HPV testing. This study aims to evaluate the impact of sample cellularity on HPV testing. A total of 37 592 liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples from women undergoing HPV-primary screening (aged 30-64, median 48; IQR: 40-56 years) were analyzed using Cobas 4800 HPV Test (Roche). Sample adequacy was assessed by the assay's β-globin internal control and by an independent quantitative cellularity assessment (OncoPredict HPV, Hiantis). HPV positivity rates (PR) were stratified according to β-globin Ct values. Among the analyzed samples, 50.0%, 47.1%, 2.3%, and 0.6% had β-globin Ct values of ≤ 28, > 28 to ≤ 32, > 32 to ≤ 34, and > 34, respectively. Overall HPV-PR was 7.7% (2891/37 592). PR reached 9.7% in samples with β-globin ≤ 28 Ct (1820/18 801), decreasing markedly to 1.4% for β-globin > 34 Ct (3/214), (p < 0.001). Quantitative analysis showed that Cobas 4800 β-globin Ct = 34 corresponds to approximately 1.5 × 10^3 nucleated cells/reaction. A subset of 195 HPV-negative samples with β-globin Ct ≥ 34 was evaluated by liquid based cytology (LBC): 19% had inadequate cellularity according to LBC guidelines, 8% were ≥ ASC-US and 73% NILMs. 65% of adequate LBC showed cellular atrophy. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing cellularity in HPV-screening to avoid potentially false-negative results due to inadequate samples. Future research should focus on establishing standardized cellularity thresholds to improve screening accuracy.

摘要

在人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)初筛中,样本质量会显著影响检测准确性。与基于细胞学的筛查不同,目前HPV检测中尚无关于样本质量评估的共识指南。本研究旨在评估样本细胞含量对HPV检测的影响。使用Cobas 4800 HPV检测法(罗氏公司)分析了37592例接受HPV初筛女性(年龄30 - 64岁,中位数48岁;四分位间距:40 - 56岁)的液基细胞学(LBC)样本。通过检测的β - 珠蛋白内对照和独立的定量细胞含量评估(OncoPredict HPV,Hiantis公司)来评估样本的充足性。HPV阳性率(PR)根据β - 珠蛋白Ct值进行分层。在分析的样本中,β - 珠蛋白Ct值≤28、>28至≤32、>32至≤34和>34的样本分别占50.0%、47.1%、2.3%和0.6%。总体HPV - PR为7.7%(2891/37592)。β - 珠蛋白Ct≤28的样本中PR达到9.7%(1820/18801),而β - 珠蛋白Ct>34的样本中PR显著降至1.4%(3/214),(p<0.001)。定量分析表明,Cobas 4800 β - 珠蛋白Ct = 34大约对应1.5×10³有核细胞/反应。对195例β - 珠蛋白Ct≥34的HPV阴性样本的一个子集进行了液基细胞学(LBC)评估:根据LBC指南,19%的样本细胞含量不足,8%为≥非典型鳞状细胞不能明确意义(ASC - US),73%为未见上皮内病变或恶性病变(NILM)。65%细胞含量充足的LBC样本显示细胞萎缩。这些发现强调了在HPV筛查中评估细胞含量的重要性,以避免因样本不足导致潜在的假阴性结果。未来的研究应专注于建立标准化的细胞含量阈值,以提高筛查准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0812/12216795/d5847fdae84f/JMV-97-e70482-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0812/12216795/513e46ac340f/JMV-97-e70482-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0812/12216795/d5847fdae84f/JMV-97-e70482-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0812/12216795/513e46ac340f/JMV-97-e70482-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0812/12216795/d5847fdae84f/JMV-97-e70482-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening: Evaluation of Sample Adequacy in HPV DNA Testing.宫颈癌筛查中的质量保证:HPV DNA检测中样本充分性的评估
J Med Virol. 2025 Jul;97(7):e70482. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70482.
2
[Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].[卫生技术评估报告。液基细胞学在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33.
3
The Utility of an Human Papillomavirus Genotype Assay for Cancer Screening in Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples from Japanese Women.人乳头瘤病毒基因分型检测在日本女性自行采集的尿液和阴道样本癌症筛查中的效用
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025;90(2):143-152. doi: 10.1159/000541641. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.普通人群宫颈癌筛查中细胞学检查与HPV检测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2.
5
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.液基细胞学检查和人乳头瘤病毒检测筛查宫颈癌:美国预防服务工作组的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):687-97, W214-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00376. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
6
Exponential uptake of HPV self-collected cervical screening testing 2 years since universal availability in Victoria, Australia.自澳大利亚维多利亚州全面推行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采集宫颈筛查检测两年以来,其接受率呈指数级增长。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04219-3.
7
Evaluation of Pre-Analytical Variables for Human Papillomavirus Primary Screening from Self-Collected Vaginal Swabs.评估人乳头瘤病毒自我采集阴道拭子的临床前变量用于初步筛查。
J Mol Diagn. 2024 Jun;26(6):487-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
Randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of different methods of HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in Singapore's primary care settings: a study protocol.评估不同方法的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测对新加坡基层医疗环境中宫颈癌筛查影响的随机对照试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 24;15(3):e095091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095091.
9
Cross-Sectional Study on the Detection of HPV Infections for Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Self-Sampling Device.使用自采样装置进行宫颈癌筛查中HPV感染检测的横断面研究
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2025 Jul 1;29(3):218-222. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000884. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
10
Restriction of human papillomavirus DNA testing in primary cervical screening to women above age 30: systematic review.将人乳头瘤病毒 DNA 检测限制在 30 岁以上的女性中进行初级宫颈癌筛查:系统评价。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):73-81. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283498dbe.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of () as a Sample Adequacy Control in HPV Molecular Diagnostics.评估()作为人乳头瘤病毒分子诊断中样本充足性控制的情况。 (括号内内容缺失,无法准确完整翻译)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;14(19):2194. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192194.
2
Human papillomavirus negative high grade cervical lesions and cancers: Suggested guidance for HPV testing quality assurance.人乳头瘤病毒阴性高级别宫颈病变和癌症:HPV 检测质量保证的建议指南。
J Clin Virol. 2024 Apr;171:105657. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105657. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
3
Impact of human papillomavirus age-related prevalence and vaccination levels on interpretation of cervical screening modalities: a modelling study.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)与年龄相关的流行率和疫苗接种水平对宫颈筛查方法解读的影响:建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e078551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078551.
4
Epidemiology and genotypes analysis of human papillomavirus infection in Beijing, China.中国北京地区人乳头瘤病毒感染的流行病学和基因型分析。
Virol J. 2024 Jan 16;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02292-3.
5
Clinical performance of the novel full-genotyping OncoPredict HPV Quantitative Typing assay using the VALGENT framework.使用VALGENT框架的新型全基因分型OncoPredict HPV定量分型检测的临床性能
Int J Cancer. 2024 Feb 1;154(3):538-547. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34754. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
6
Quality assurance in human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical screening.人乳头瘤病毒检测用于原发性宫颈癌筛查的质量保证。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 May 1;33(5):802-811. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004197.
7
Sample Adequacy Control (SAC) Lowers False Negatives and Increases the Quality of Screening: Introduction of "Non-Competitive" SAC for qPCR Assays.样本充足性控制(SAC)降低假阴性并提高筛查质量:用于定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测的“非竞争性”SAC的引入。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;11(7):1133. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071133.
8
HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences.HPV 自我采样用于宫颈癌筛查:价值观和偏好的系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003743.
9
2020 list of human papillomavirus assays suitable for primary cervical cancer screening.2020 年适合用于宫颈癌初筛的人乳头瘤病毒检测方法列表。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Aug;27(8):1083-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 May 8.
10
It's time to re-evaluate cervical Cancer screening after age 65.现在是时候重新评估 65 岁以上女性的宫颈癌筛查了。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jul;162(1):200-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Apr 26.