• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)与年龄相关的流行率和疫苗接种水平对宫颈筛查方法解读的影响:建模研究。

Impact of human papillomavirus age-related prevalence and vaccination levels on interpretation of cervical screening modalities: a modelling study.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e078551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078551.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078551
PMID:38309749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10840029/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cervical screening is a life-saving intervention, which reduces the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer in the population. Human papillomavirus (HPV) based screening modalities hold unique promise in improving screening accuracy. HPV prevalence varies markedly by age, as does resultant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), with higher rates recorded in younger women. With the advent of effective vaccination for HPV drastically reducing prevalence of both HPV and CIN, it is critical to model how the accuracy of different screening approaches varies with age cohort and vaccination status. This work establishes a model for the age-specific prevalence of HPV factoring in vaccine coverage and predicts how the accuracy of common screening modalities is affected by age profile and vaccine uptake.

DESIGN

Modelling study of HPV infection rates by age, ascertained from European cohorts prior to the introduction of vaccination. Reductions in HPV due to vaccination were estimated from the bounds predicted from multiple modelling studies, yielding a model for age-varying HPV and CIN grades 2 and above (CIN2+) prevalence.

SETTING

Performance of both conventional liquid-based cytology (LBC) screening and HPV screening with LBC reflex (HPV reflex) was estimated under different simulated age cohorts and vaccination levels.

PARTICIPANTS

Simulated populations of varying age and vaccination status.

RESULTS

HPV-reflex modalities consistently result in much lower incidence of false positives than LBC testing, with an accuracy that improves even as HPV and CIN2+ rates decline.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV-reflex tests outperform LBC tests across all age profiles, resulting in greater test accuracy. This improvement is especially pronounced as HPV infection rates fall and suggests HPV-reflex modalities are robust to future changes in the epidemiology of HPV.

摘要

目的

宫颈筛查是一种挽救生命的干预措施,可降低人群中宫颈癌的发病率和死亡率。基于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的筛查方法在提高筛查准确性方面具有独特的优势。HPV 的流行率随年龄而变化,宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的发生率也随之变化,年轻女性的发生率较高。由于 HPV 的有效疫苗接种大大降低了 HPV 和 CIN 的流行率,因此必须建立模型来了解不同筛查方法的准确性如何随年龄组和疫苗接种状态而变化。这项工作建立了一个考虑疫苗接种覆盖率的 HPV 特定年龄流行率模型,并预测了常见筛查方法的准确性如何受年龄分布和疫苗接种率的影响。

设计

对欧洲队列在接种疫苗前的 HPV 感染率进行年龄别建模研究。根据来自多个建模研究的预测范围,估计疫苗接种对 HPV 的减少量,从而建立一个 HPV 和 CIN 2 级及以上(CIN2+)流行率随年龄变化的模型。

设置

根据不同模拟年龄组和疫苗接种水平,估计常规液基细胞学(LBC)筛查和 LBC 反射 HPV 筛查(HPV 反射)的性能。

参与者

不同年龄和疫苗接种状态的模拟人群。

结果

HPV 反射方法比 LBC 检测产生的假阳性率低得多,即使 HPV 和 CIN2+的发生率下降,其准确性也会提高。

结论

HPV 反射测试在所有年龄组中均优于 LBC 测试,从而提高了测试准确性。随着 HPV 感染率的下降,这种改善尤为明显,这表明 HPV 反射方法对 HPV 流行病学的未来变化具有稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f107/10840029/3a7508aac0e9/bmjopen-2023-078551f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f107/10840029/973bf46451a4/bmjopen-2023-078551f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f107/10840029/1c1a016cff6b/bmjopen-2023-078551f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f107/10840029/3a7508aac0e9/bmjopen-2023-078551f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f107/10840029/973bf46451a4/bmjopen-2023-078551f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f107/10840029/1c1a016cff6b/bmjopen-2023-078551f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f107/10840029/3a7508aac0e9/bmjopen-2023-078551f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of human papillomavirus age-related prevalence and vaccination levels on interpretation of cervical screening modalities: a modelling study.人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)与年龄相关的流行率和疫苗接种水平对宫颈筛查方法解读的影响:建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e078551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078551.
2
Modeling Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies With Varying Levels of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination.建模 HPV 疫苗接种率不同的宫颈癌筛查策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2115321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15321.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
4
Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.在一个33岁及以下女性此前已接种HPV疫苗的女性群体中,采用原发性HPV检测或细胞学进行宫颈癌筛查:指南针试点随机试验的结果。
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 19;14(9):e1002388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002388. eCollection 2017 Sep.
5
[Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].[卫生技术评估报告。液基细胞学在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33.
6
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.普通人群宫颈癌筛查中细胞学检查与HPV检测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2.
7
Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.宫颈癌筛查中液基细胞学分流高危型人乳头瘤病毒基因检测用于高级别宫颈病变的检出率及成本效益分析。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2017 Jul;46(7):267-273.
8
New concepts on risk factors of HPV and novel screening strategies for cervical cancer precursors.人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)风险因素的新概念及宫颈癌前病变的新型筛查策略
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(3):205-21.
9
The impact of bivalent HPV vaccine on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by deprivation in Scotland: reducing the gap.苏格兰二价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗对因疫苗接种不足导致的宫颈上皮内瘤变的影响:缩小差距
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Oct;71(10):954-960. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209113. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
10
Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.HPV 焦点随机临床试验:48 个月时,用初级宫颈 HPV 检测与细胞学检测筛查对高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的影响。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):43-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7464.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of vaginal lactic acid bacteria changes on occurrence of HR-HPV-infected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and construction and validation of nomogram model.阴道乳酸菌变化对高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的宫颈上皮内瘤变发生的预测价值及列线图模型的构建与验证
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14604-z.
2
Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening: Evaluation of Sample Adequacy in HPV DNA Testing.宫颈癌筛查中的质量保证:HPV DNA检测中样本充分性的评估
J Med Virol. 2025 Jul;97(7):e70482. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70482.

本文引用的文献

1
Confusion and anxiety in between abnormal cervical cancer screening results and colposcopy: "The land of the unknown".异常宫颈癌筛查结果与阴道镜检查之间的困惑和焦虑:“未知之地”。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107810. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107810. Epub 2023 May 23.
2
Anxiety in women referred for colposcopy: a prospective observational study.接受阴道镜检查的女性的焦虑:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Mar;305(3):625-630. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06337-8. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
3
Worldwide initiatives to eliminate cervical cancer.
全球消除宫颈癌倡议。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;155 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):102-106. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13879.
4
Modeling Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies With Varying Levels of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination.建模 HPV 疫苗接种率不同的宫颈癌筛查策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2115321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15321.
5
Overuse of Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Women With Average Risk in the United States From 2013 to 2014.美国 2013-2014 年一般风险女性中过度使用宫颈癌筛查检测的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8373.
6
The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚消除宫颈癌的预计时间框架:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jan;4(1):e19-e27. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30183-X. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
Population-level impact, herd immunity, and elimination after human papillomavirus vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictions from transmission-dynamic models.人群水平影响、 herd immunity(群体免疫)和人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种后的消除:基于传播动力学模型预测的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2016 Nov;1(1):e8-e17. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30001-9. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.普通人群宫颈癌筛查中细胞学检查与HPV检测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2.
9
Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test.人乳头瘤病毒用于宫颈癌一线筛查的 ATHENA 研究:研究结束时的结果
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Feb;136(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.076. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials.HPV 检测在宫颈癌筛查中的效果:四项欧洲随机对照试验的随访研究。
Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7. Epub 2013 Nov 3.