• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估数字交付的国家糖尿病预防计划在农村成年人中的适配性:定性研究

Assessing the Fit of a Digitally Delivered National Diabetes Prevention Program Among Rural Living Adults: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Wagner Gerit, Koon Lyndsie M, Smith Patricia, Suire Kameron B, Hastert Mary, Donnelly Joseph E, Olfert Melissa D, Estabrooks Paul, Gorczyca Anna M

机构信息

Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.

Research and Training Center on Independent Living, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 2;9:e70406. doi: 10.2196/70406.

DOI:10.2196/70406
PMID:40601375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12268215/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rural living adults are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes compared to their urban counterparts. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) is an evidence-based intervention that reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes through increased physical activity and modest weight loss, but overall reach remains limited, specifically in rural communities.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study aimed to examine the fit of the National DPP delivered digitally using Zoom or Facebook to rural living adults at risk for type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Focus group scripts assessed the characteristics and perceptions of rural adults at risk for type 2 diabetes, infrastructure supports for implementation and sustainability, and external factors that could influence program fit. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted separately on coded transcripts for each focus group. Themes were then deductively linked to the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model domains.

RESULTS

Two focus groups were conducted with 14 participants after participating in the National DPP for 6 months, delivered through Zoom (n=9) or Facebook (n=5). Participants highlighted positive relationships between Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model constructs related to participant characteristics (ie, value of health improvements, weight loss, and reduced medication dependence as primary motivators) and perceptions of compatibility (ie, content alignment with participant needs) as well as infrastructure (ie, digital platforms provided better access) with program success in reach and engagement. Conversely, both formats were negatively impacted by interruptions in internet connectivity. External factors, such as referral pathways from local health care providers, could improve program reach. When considering differences between implementation infrastructure, Zoom facilitated greater social engagement and accountability compared to Facebook.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified contextual factors influencing the fit of digitally delivering the National DPP to rural living adults, including opportunities for using existing connections and health motivations to help improve acceptability, while tailoring curriculum, modality, and technology may improve appropriateness for rural populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05387434; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05387434.

摘要

背景

与城市成年人相比,农村成年人受2型糖尿病的影响更为严重。美国疾病控制与预防中心的国家糖尿病预防计划(National DPP)是一项基于证据的干预措施,通过增加身体活动和适度减重来降低2型糖尿病的风险,但总体覆盖面仍然有限,特别是在农村社区。

目的

本定性研究旨在探讨通过Zoom或Facebook以数字方式提供的国家糖尿病预防计划对有2型糖尿病风险的农村成年人的适用性。

方法

焦点小组脚本评估了有2型糖尿病风险的农村成年人的特征和看法、实施和可持续性的基础设施支持以及可能影响项目适用性的外部因素。对每个焦点小组的编码记录分别进行了反思性主题分析。然后将主题与实用、稳健实施和可持续性模型领域进行演绎联系。

结果

在通过Zoom(n = 9)或Facebook(n = 5)参与国家糖尿病预防计划6个月后,对14名参与者进行了两个焦点小组访谈。参与者强调了实用、稳健实施和可持续性模型结构与参与者特征(即健康改善、体重减轻和药物依赖减少的价值作为主要动机)、兼容性看法(即内容与参与者需求的一致性)以及基础设施(即数字平台提供了更好的获取途径)之间的积极关系,这些与项目在覆盖面和参与度方面的成功有关。相反,两种形式都受到互联网连接中断的负面影响。外部因素,如当地医疗保健提供者的转诊途径,可以提高项目覆盖面。在考虑实施基础设施的差异时,与Facebook相比,Zoom促进了更大的社交参与和问责制。

结论

本研究确定了影响以数字方式向农村成年人提供国家糖尿病预防计划适用性的背景因素,包括利用现有联系和健康动机来帮助提高可接受性的机会,同时调整课程、模式和技术可能会提高对农村人口的适用性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05387434;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05387434 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/290d/12268215/6532e353002b/formative_v9i1e70406_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/290d/12268215/6532e353002b/formative_v9i1e70406_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/290d/12268215/6532e353002b/formative_v9i1e70406_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Fit of a Digitally Delivered National Diabetes Prevention Program Among Rural Living Adults: Qualitative Study.评估数字交付的国家糖尿病预防计划在农村成年人中的适配性:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 2;9:e70406. doi: 10.2196/70406.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
7
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
8
"Listening to understand," exploring postpartum women's perceptions of their social networks and social support in relation to their health behaviors and weight: A qualitative exploratory study.“倾听以理解”:一项定性探索性研究,探讨产后女性对其社交网络以及与健康行为和体重相关的社会支持的认知
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241309774. doi: 10.1177/17455057241309774.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.全社区范围内增加身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the European Union: A Systematic Review of Interventional Studies.欧盟2型糖尿病的一级预防:干预性研究的系统评价
Nutrients. 2025 Mar 17;17(6):1053. doi: 10.3390/nu17061053.
2
Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral to type 2 diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review.医护人员对转诊至2型糖尿病预防项目的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 7;15(3):e090105. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090105.
3
Service users' experiences of, and engagement with, a nationally implemented digital diabetes prevention programme.
服务使用者参与全国实施的数字糖尿病预防计划的经历
Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Feb;30(1):e12787. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12787.
4
Reconceptualizing rurality: Exploring community capital to identify distinct rural classes in the United States.重新认识农村地区:探索社区资本以识别美国不同的农村阶层。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Dec 2;29:101729. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101729. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
The Application and Evolution of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM): History and Innovations.实用、稳健实施与可持续性模型(PRISM)的应用与演进:历史与创新
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2024;4(4):404-420. doi: 10.1007/s43477-024-00134-6. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
6
Implementation lessons learned from the University of California's Diabetes Prevention Program Initiative.从加利福尼亚大学糖尿病预防计划中获得的实施经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):2777. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20198-1.
7
Patterns of Ownership and Usage of Wearable Devices in the United States, 2020-2022: Survey Study.2020-2022 年美国可穿戴设备的拥有和使用模式:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e56504. doi: 10.2196/56504.
8
A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International.对《健康促进国际》中反思性主题分析报告的批判性回顾。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae049.
9
Weight management in rural health clinics: Results from the randomized midwest diet and exercise trial.农村健康诊所的体重管理:中西部饮食与运动随机试验的结果
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 Apr 24;10(2):e753. doi: 10.1002/osp4.753. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Multilevel perceptions of the virtual delivery of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program on RE-AIM domains due to COVID-19 mandates.由于 COVID-19 规定,对加利福尼亚大学糖尿病预防计划通过虚拟方式进行的多层次感知在 RE-AIM 领域的体现。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 8;12:1327429. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1327429. eCollection 2024.