Rehill Patrick, Barnes Roy, Biddle Nicholas, Edwards Ben
POLIS: The Centre for Social Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
School of Politics and International Relations, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0325753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325753. eCollection 2025.
The extraordinary public policy response to COVID-19 in Australia saw extended lockdowns in some Australian states and territories, some of the longest in the world. This paper seeks to understand the effect these periods of lockdown had on the mental health of those living through them. Using a staggered difference-in-differences design we study two different periods - one in 2020, one in 2021. During this time there were some jurisdictions (Victoria, New South Wales and in the second period the Australian Capital Territory) experiencing extended lockdowns while the rest of the country was largely living life as normal with no or low local transmission of the virus. While there seems to have been an effect in this first period, we do not find a statistically measurable effect in 2021 as even though distress rose during the lockdown period, it rose similarly among those jurisdictions out of lockdown as well. We speculate this may be because of adaptation to stress, growing cases in control jurisdictions, or the vaccine roll-out providing a concrete endpoint for lockdowns.
澳大利亚针对新冠疫情采取了非同寻常的公共政策应对措施,一些澳大利亚州和领地实施了延长的封锁措施,其中一些是全球最长的封锁期。本文旨在了解这些封锁期对经历封锁的人们心理健康的影响。我们采用交错差分设计研究了两个不同时期——一个在2020年,一个在2021年。在此期间,一些司法管辖区(维多利亚州、新南威尔士州以及在第二个时期的澳大利亚首都领地)经历了延长的封锁,而该国其他地区在很大程度上正常生活,病毒本地传播极少或没有。虽然在第一个时期似乎有影响,但我们在2021年没有发现统计学上可衡量的影响,因为尽管在封锁期间痛苦有所增加,但在未实施封锁的司法管辖区中痛苦也同样增加。我们推测这可能是由于对压力的适应、控制疫情的司法管辖区病例增加,或者疫苗接种为封锁提供了一个明确的终点。