• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对消费者关于初级卫生专业人员在基因组医学中作用的知识、态度和经历的系统评价。

A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.

作者信息

Sheriff Samran, Vizheh Maryam, Patel Romika, Spanos Samantha, Lamprell Klay, Braithwaite Jeffrey, Long Janet C

机构信息

Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01904-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41431-025-01904-y
PMID:40604115
Abstract

The integration of genetic testing into primary care is influencing healthcare practices, yet little is known about consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with genetic testing services or the practitioners who provide them. This systematic review synthesizes peer-reviewed studies on consumers' perspectives regarding the role of primary health professionals in delivering genomic medicine in primary care settings. Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO) were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria focused on studies that addressed consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences related to Primary Care Providers' (PCP) roles in genomic medicine. Data relevant to the review objective, including key article characteristics, barriers and facilitators of implementation, and recommendations for advancement or optimisation, were extracted and analysed using thematic analysis. We reviewed 19 studies meeting the inclusion criteria involving 3557 participants. Thematic analysis identified two overarching themes: consumer views on genomic testing irrespective of setting, comprising three sub-themes, and consumer views on genomic testing in the primary care setting, comprising four sub-themes. Consumers' trust in PCPs as familiar and approachable professionals was a major concern. Consumers often reported positive experiences when PCPs were well-informed and communicative, but negative experiences were common when there was a perceived lack of knowledge or confidence from the PCP. As reported in other healthcare settings, concerns about privacy, data security, and the cost of genomic testing were also prominent. Integrating genomic medicine into primary care requires trust-building between PCPs and consumers, enhancing PCP education and resources, addressing privacy and cost concerns and strengthening collaboration with genetic specialists to improve consumer experiences.

摘要

将基因检测纳入初级保健正在影响医疗保健实践,但对于消费者对基因检测服务或提供这些服务的从业者的知识、态度和体验却知之甚少。本系统综述综合了同行评审的研究,这些研究探讨了消费者对初级卫生专业人员在初级保健环境中提供基因组医学方面作用的看法。我们系统检索了六个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO)。纳入标准侧重于涉及消费者与初级保健提供者(PCP)在基因组医学中作用相关的知识、态度和体验的研究。使用主题分析法提取并分析了与综述目标相关的数据,包括关键文章特征、实施的障碍和促进因素以及推进或优化的建议。我们审查了19项符合纳入标准的研究,涉及3557名参与者。主题分析确定了两个总体主题:无论环境如何,消费者对基因检测的看法,包括三个子主题;以及消费者对初级保健环境中基因检测的看法,包括四个子主题。消费者对作为熟悉且平易近人的专业人员的初级保健提供者的信任是一个主要关注点。当初级保健提供者信息充分且善于沟通时,消费者经常报告积极的体验,但当认为初级保健提供者缺乏知识或信心时,负面体验很常见。正如在其他医疗保健环境中所报道的那样,对隐私、数据安全和基因检测成本的担忧也很突出。将基因组医学纳入初级保健需要在初级保健提供者和消费者之间建立信任,加强初级保健提供者的教育和资源,解决隐私和成本问题,并加强与基因专家的合作,以改善消费者体验。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.对消费者关于初级卫生专业人员在基因组医学中作用的知识、态度和经历的系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01904-y.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
7
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
8
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
9
Rapid molecular tests for tuberculosis and tuberculosis drug resistance: a qualitative evidence synthesis of recipient and provider views.快速分子检测结核分枝杆菌和结核分枝杆菌耐药性:受检者和提供者观点的定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD014877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014877.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Publics' knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics: a scoping review.公众对健康相关基因组学的知识、态度和动机:范围综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul;32(7):747-758. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01547-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Attitudes towards genetic testing: The role of genetic literacy, motivated cognition, and socio-demographic characteristics.对基因检测的态度:遗传素养、动机认知和社会人口特征的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0293187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293187. eCollection 2023.
3
Supporting healthcare professionals to offer reproductive genetic carrier screening: a behaviour change theory approach.
支持医疗保健专业人员提供生殖遗传携带者筛查:一种行为改变理论方法。
Aust J Prim Health. 2023 Oct;29(5):480-489. doi: 10.1071/PY23022.
4
The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie's Mission): Design and Implementation.澳大利亚生殖遗传携带者筛查项目(麦肯齐使命):设计与实施
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 28;12(11):1781. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111781.
5
Barriers, interventions, and recommendations: Improving the genetic testing landscape.障碍、干预措施及建议:改善基因检测现状
Front Digit Health. 2022 Nov 1;4:961128. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.961128. eCollection 2022.
6
Informed choice and attitudes regarding a genomic test to predict risk of colorectal cancer in general practice.在一般实践中,关于预测结直肠癌风险的基因组检测的知情选择和态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):987-995. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
7
Techniques for the Detection of Sickle Cell Disease: A Review.镰状细胞病的检测技术:综述
Micromachines (Basel). 2021 May 5;12(5):519. doi: 10.3390/mi12050519.
8
Health system interventions to integrate genetic testing in routine oncology services: A systematic review.健康系统干预措施将基因检测纳入常规肿瘤学服务:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0250379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250379. eCollection 2021.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Investigating the Adoption of Clinical Genomics in Australia. An Implementation Science Case Study.调查澳大利亚临床基因组学的采用情况。一项实施科学案例研究。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Feb 23;12(2):317. doi: 10.3390/genes12020317.