文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

对消费者关于初级卫生专业人员在基因组医学中作用的知识、态度和经历的系统评价。

A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.

作者信息

Sheriff Samran, Vizheh Maryam, Patel Romika, Spanos Samantha, Lamprell Klay, Braithwaite Jeffrey, Long Janet C

机构信息

Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01904-y.


DOI:10.1038/s41431-025-01904-y
PMID:40604115
Abstract

The integration of genetic testing into primary care is influencing healthcare practices, yet little is known about consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with genetic testing services or the practitioners who provide them. This systematic review synthesizes peer-reviewed studies on consumers' perspectives regarding the role of primary health professionals in delivering genomic medicine in primary care settings. Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO) were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria focused on studies that addressed consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences related to Primary Care Providers' (PCP) roles in genomic medicine. Data relevant to the review objective, including key article characteristics, barriers and facilitators of implementation, and recommendations for advancement or optimisation, were extracted and analysed using thematic analysis. We reviewed 19 studies meeting the inclusion criteria involving 3557 participants. Thematic analysis identified two overarching themes: consumer views on genomic testing irrespective of setting, comprising three sub-themes, and consumer views on genomic testing in the primary care setting, comprising four sub-themes. Consumers' trust in PCPs as familiar and approachable professionals was a major concern. Consumers often reported positive experiences when PCPs were well-informed and communicative, but negative experiences were common when there was a perceived lack of knowledge or confidence from the PCP. As reported in other healthcare settings, concerns about privacy, data security, and the cost of genomic testing were also prominent. Integrating genomic medicine into primary care requires trust-building between PCPs and consumers, enhancing PCP education and resources, addressing privacy and cost concerns and strengthening collaboration with genetic specialists to improve consumer experiences.

摘要

将基因检测纳入初级保健正在影响医疗保健实践,但对于消费者对基因检测服务或提供这些服务的从业者的知识、态度和体验却知之甚少。本系统综述综合了同行评审的研究,这些研究探讨了消费者对初级卫生专业人员在初级保健环境中提供基因组医学方面作用的看法。我们系统检索了六个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO)。纳入标准侧重于涉及消费者与初级保健提供者(PCP)在基因组医学中作用相关的知识、态度和体验的研究。使用主题分析法提取并分析了与综述目标相关的数据,包括关键文章特征、实施的障碍和促进因素以及推进或优化的建议。我们审查了19项符合纳入标准的研究,涉及3557名参与者。主题分析确定了两个总体主题:无论环境如何,消费者对基因检测的看法,包括三个子主题;以及消费者对初级保健环境中基因检测的看法,包括四个子主题。消费者对作为熟悉且平易近人的专业人员的初级保健提供者的信任是一个主要关注点。当初级保健提供者信息充分且善于沟通时,消费者经常报告积极的体验,但当认为初级保健提供者缺乏知识或信心时,负面体验很常见。正如在其他医疗保健环境中所报道的那样,对隐私、数据安全和基因检测成本的担忧也很突出。将基因组医学纳入初级保健需要在初级保健提供者和消费者之间建立信任,加强初级保健提供者的教育和资源,解决隐私和成本问题,并加强与基因专家的合作,以改善消费者体验。

相似文献

[1]
A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2025-7-2

[2]
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-3-14

[3]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[4]
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-2-7

[5]
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-4

[6]
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-15

[7]
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-10-27

[8]
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-10-4

[9]
Rapid molecular tests for tuberculosis and tuberculosis drug resistance: a qualitative evidence synthesis of recipient and provider views.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-4-26

[10]
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

本文引用的文献

[1]
Publics' knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics: a scoping review.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2024-7

[2]
Attitudes towards genetic testing: The role of genetic literacy, motivated cognition, and socio-demographic characteristics.

PLoS One. 2023

[3]
Supporting healthcare professionals to offer reproductive genetic carrier screening: a behaviour change theory approach.

Aust J Prim Health. 2023-10

[4]
The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie's Mission): Design and Implementation.

J Pers Med. 2022-10-28

[5]
Barriers, interventions, and recommendations: Improving the genetic testing landscape.

Front Digit Health. 2022-11-1

[6]
Informed choice and attitudes regarding a genomic test to predict risk of colorectal cancer in general practice.

Patient Educ Couns. 2022-4

[7]
Techniques for the Detection of Sickle Cell Disease: A Review.

Micromachines (Basel). 2021-5-5

[8]
Health system interventions to integrate genetic testing in routine oncology services: A systematic review.

PLoS One. 2021

[9]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[10]
Investigating the Adoption of Clinical Genomics in Australia. An Implementation Science Case Study.

Genes (Basel). 2021-2-23

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索