• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识、能动性与所有权交织下的手术中的人机协作。

Human-robot collaboration in surgery at the nexus of knowledge, agency, and ownership.

作者信息

Merdin-Uygur Ezgi, Ozturkcan Selcen, Özbilgin Mustafa F, Yılmaz Faruk, İnce Özgür

机构信息

Brunel Business School, Brunel University of London, Uxbridge, UK.

School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08437-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-08437-w
PMID:40604196
Abstract

Human-robot collaboration is transforming healthcare, particularly in surgical environments. Robotic surgery systems, embodied by advanced AI, are pivotal in augmenting human expertise across specialties such as gynecology and laparoscopic surgery. However, critical gaps remain in understanding how knowledge, agency, and ownership shape these collaborations. We address these gaps through semi-structured interviews with eleven healthcare professionals from diverse surgical roles. Our findings reveal that while robotic systems enhance precision and efficiency, they also generate tensions related to professional autonomy, control, and responsibility. Participants expressed ambivalent views, simultaneously demonstrating trust in the technology and strategic disengagement to preserve human authority. Concepts such as avatarization, the perception of robots as extensions of the self, and strategic ignorance emerged as key mechanisms through which professionals manage this evolving relationship. These dynamics point to the need for rethinking human-robot roles as fluid and co-constructed rather than fixed or hierarchical. We also emphasize the possible use of robotic systems to promote inclusivity and accessibility in healthcare while identifying structural barriers such as high costs, dependence on proprietary technology, and uneven organizational readiness. Our research enhances theoretical frameworks on human-robot interaction, providing practical and conceptual insights for the creation of equitable, sustainable, and context-sensitive robotic healthcare systems.

摘要

人机协作正在改变医疗保健领域,尤其是在手术环境中。以先进人工智能为代表的机器人手术系统,对于增强妇科和腹腔镜手术等各个专业领域的人类专业技能至关重要。然而,在理解知识、能动性和所有权如何塑造这些协作方面,仍存在关键差距。我们通过对来自不同手术岗位的11名医疗保健专业人员进行半结构化访谈来解决这些差距。我们的研究结果表明,虽然机器人系统提高了精准度和效率,但它们也引发了与职业自主性、控制权和责任相关的紧张关系。参与者表达了矛盾的观点,既对技术表示信任,又进行策略性脱离以维护人类权威。如化身化、将机器人视为自我延伸的认知以及策略性忽视等概念,成为专业人员管理这种不断演变的关系的关键机制。这些动态变化表明,需要将人机角色重新思考为灵活且共同构建的,而非固定或等级分明的。我们还强调了利用机器人系统促进医疗保健领域的包容性和可及性的可能性,同时指出了诸如高成本、对专有技术的依赖以及组织准备程度不均衡等结构性障碍。我们的研究完善了关于人机交互的理论框架,为创建公平、可持续且因地制宜的机器人医疗保健系统提供了实践和概念层面的见解。

相似文献

1
Human-robot collaboration in surgery at the nexus of knowledge, agency, and ownership.知识、能动性与所有权交织下的手术中的人机协作。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08437-w.
2
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Acceptability of 'as needed' biologic therapy in psoriasis: insights from a multistakeholder mixed-methods study.“按需”生物疗法治疗银屑病的可接受性:来自多方利益相关者混合方法研究的见解。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):243-251. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae068.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.系统评价和经济建模研究腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗局限性前列腺癌患者前列腺的相对临床获益和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences.超越手术工具:机器人作为健康科学专业人员教育的教学工具的系统评价。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Oct;27(4):1139-1176. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10118-6. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Complexity and Bile Duct Injury After Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的患者复杂性和胆管损伤
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251705. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1705.
2
When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人机结合何时有用:系统评价与荟萃分析
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2293-2303. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Levels of autonomy in FDA-cleared surgical robots: a systematic review.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的手术机器人的自主水平:一项系统评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Apr 26;7(1):103. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01102-y.
4
Human-Robot Collaboration for Healthcare: A Narrative Review.用于医疗保健的人机协作:叙事综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49210. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较安全性。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Dec 1;158(12):1303-1310. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389.
6
Six hours to study: temporality and ignorance in medical education.六小时学习:医学教育中的时间性和无知。
Anthropol Med. 2021 Dec;28(4):429-444. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2021.1890943. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
Users' ambivalent sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare.用户对医疗保健人形机器人安全保障的矛盾心理。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Jun 2;46(2):218-226. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1883027. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Attitudes of the Surgical Team Toward Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: International 2-Stage Cross-Sectional Survey.神经外科手术团队对人工智能的态度:国际两阶段横断面调查
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e724-e730. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.171. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
9
Psychological reactions to human versus robotic job replacement.对人类和机器人工作替代的心理反应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;3(10):1062-1069. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0670-y. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.支持和制约机器人辅助手术实施的因素:一项现实主义访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e028635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635.