Taylor Christopher H, Watson David James George, Skelhorn John, Bell Danny, Burdett Simon, Codyre Aoife, Cooley Kathryn, Davies James R, Dawson Joshua Joseph, D'Cruz Tahiré, Gandhi Samir Raj, Jackson Hannah J, Lowe Rebecca, Ogilvie Elizabeth, Pond Alexandra Lei, Rees Hallie, Richardson Joseph, Sains Joshua, Short Francis, Brignell Christopher, Davidson Gabrielle L, Rowland Hannah M, East Mark, Goodridge Ruth, Gilbert Francis, Reader Tom
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nature. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09216-3.
In a classic example of adaptation, harmless Batesian mimics gain protection from predators through resemblance to one or more unpalatable models. Mimics vary greatly in accuracy, and explaining the persistence of inaccurate mimics is an ongoing challenge for evolutionary biologists. Empirical testing of existing hypotheses is constrained by the difficulty of assessing the fitness of phenotypes absent among extant species, leaving large parts of the adaptive landscape unexplored-a problem affecting the study of the evolution of most complex traits. Here, to address this, we created mimetic phenotypes that occupy hypothetical areas of trait space by morphing between 3D images of real insects (flies and wasps), and tested the responses of real predators to high-resolution, full-colour 3D-printed reproductions of these phenotypes. We found that birds have an excellent ability to learn to discriminate among insects on the basis of subtle differences in appearance, but this ability is weaker for pattern and shape than for colour and size traits. We found that mimics gained no special protection from intermediate resemblance to multiple model phenotypes. However, discrimination ability was lower in some invertebrate predators (especially crab spiders and mantises), highlighting that the predator community is key to explaining the apparent inaccuracy of many mimics.
在一个经典的适应性例子中,无害的贝氏拟态者通过与一种或多种难吃的模型相似而获得免受捕食者侵害的保护。拟态者在逼真度上差异很大,解释不精确拟态者的持续存在对进化生物学家来说是一个持续的挑战。对现有假说的实证检验受到评估现存物种中不存在的表型适应性的困难的限制,导致大部分适应性景观未被探索——这一问题影响了对大多数复杂性状进化的研究。在这里,为了解决这个问题,我们通过对真实昆虫(苍蝇和黄蜂)的三维图像进行变形,创造出占据性状空间假设区域的拟态表型,并测试了真实捕食者对这些表型的高分辨率、全彩三维打印复制品的反应。我们发现,鸟类具有很强的能力,能够根据外观上的细微差异学会区分昆虫,但这种能力在图案和形状方面比在颜色和大小性状方面要弱。我们发现,拟态者与多种模型表型的中等相似度并没有使其获得特殊保护。然而,一些无脊椎动物捕食者(尤其是蟹蛛和螳螂)的辨别能力较低,这突出表明捕食者群落是解释许多拟态者明显不精确性的关键。