Ozdede Melih, Akay Gulsun, Karadag Atas Ozge
Dept. of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir, Turkey.
Dept. of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06442-z.
This study aimed to assess the influence of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) device type, voxel resolution, and segmentation software on the accuracy of tooth volume measurements.
Thirty extracted single-rooted human incisor teeth were included. Physical volumes were determined using the Archimedes water displacement method (WDM) as the gold standard. Each tooth was scanned using two CBCT devices (Planmeca Promax 3D-Mid and NewTom 5G-XL) at two voxel sizes (0.1-mm and 0.2-mm). Segmentation was performed using two semi-automatic software programs: 3D Slicer and ITK-SNAP. Volumetric deviations from WDM were statistically analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.
Although the differences between the two CBCT devices (p = 0.431) and voxel sizes (p = 0.070) were not statistically significant, a trend toward improved volumetric accuracy was noted with the Planmeca Promax 3D-Mid device and the 0.1 mm voxel size. In contrast, a statistically significant difference was found between the segmentation programs (p < 0.001). ITK-SNAP consistently produced higher volume deviations compared to both 3D Slicer and the gold-standard WDM. The most accurate results were achieved using the Planmeca Promax 3D-Mid device, a 0.1 mm voxel size, and the 3D Slicer software, with no statistically significant deviation from WDM (p = 0.467).
CBCT device selection and voxel size (0.1-mm vs. 0.2-mm) did not significantly affect volumetric accuracy in single-rooted incisor teeth. However, the choice of segmentation software played a critical role, with 3D Slicer providing measurements closest to the gold standard. These findings highlight the importance of software selection in CBCT-based volumetric measurements for dental applications, though the results may be limited to teeth with similar anatomical complexity (e.g., single-rooted incisors).
本研究旨在评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)设备类型、体素分辨率和分割软件对牙齿体积测量准确性的影响。
纳入30颗拔除的单根人切牙。采用阿基米德排水法(WDM)测定物理体积作为金标准。每颗牙齿使用两种CBCT设备(普兰梅卡Promax 3D-Mid和NewTom 5G-XL)在两种体素大小(0.1毫米和0.2毫米)下进行扫描。使用两种半自动软件程序进行分割:3D Slicer和ITK-SNAP。采用重复测量方差分析对与WDM的体积偏差进行统计学分析,显著性水平设定为p<0.05。
尽管两种CBCT设备(p = 0.431)和体素大小(p = 0.070)之间的差异无统计学意义,但普兰梅卡Promax 3D-Mid设备和0.1毫米体素大小显示出体积准确性提高的趋势。相比之下,分割程序之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。与3D Slicer和金标准WDM相比,ITK-SNAP始终产生更高的体积偏差。使用普兰梅卡Promax 3D-Mid设备、0.1毫米体素大小和3D Slicer软件获得了最准确的结果,与WDM无统计学显著偏差(p = 0.467)。
CBCT设备的选择和体素大小(0.1毫米与0.2毫米)对单根切牙的体积准确性没有显著影响。然而,分割软件的选择起着关键作用,3D Slicer提供的测量结果最接近金标准。这些发现突出了在基于CBCT的牙科应用体积测量中软件选择的重要性,尽管结果可能仅限于具有相似解剖复杂性的牙齿(例如单根切牙)。