Suppr超能文献

预防性负压伤口治疗降低急诊手术患者浅表手术部位感染风险:一项多中心随机前瞻性临床试验的结果

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Herczeg András, Szijártó Attila, Fülöp András, Varga Krisztina, Marton József, Lóderer Zoltán, Mohos Balázs, Páncél Balázs, Szendrényi Vilmos, Lázár György, Libor László, Káposztás Zsolt, Máthé Ervin, Bursics Attila, Kecskédi Bence, Sikorszki László, Venczel László, Bánky Balázs

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Surgery, St. Borbala Hospital, Tatabánya, Hungary.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2025 Jul;22(7):e70718. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70718.

Abstract

Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% p = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% p = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687.

摘要

尽管采取了现代无菌预防措施,但手术部位感染仍然是一个重大问题。虽然负压伤口治疗在慢性伤口治疗中的益处已得到充分证实,但关于负压在预防手术部位感染方面的潜在作用仍缺乏高级别证据。我们进行了一项关于闭合切口真空疗法的多中心、随机、前瞻性试验。共有90例接受急诊剖腹手术的普通外科患者入组并随机分组,治疗组45例,对照组45例。我们的目的是显示两组之间手术部位感染率存在显著差异。在研究组中,剖腹手术伤口接受为期5天的预防性真空疗法单一疗程治疗,而对照组采用无菌纱布敷料进行常规术后伤口处理。研究组45例患者中有10例发生手术部位感染,而对照组45例中有20例发生(22.2%对44.4%,p = 0.025)。进一步分析发现,ciNPWT组浅表手术部位感染的比例显著较低(40%对20%,p = 0.038),而深部手术部位感染率的差异无统计学意义(4.4%对4.4%,p = 1.0)。总之,负压伤口治疗不仅是治愈慢性伤口的有效方法,而且其预防性使用可能会降低手术部位感染的总体发生率。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03716687。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验