Suppr超能文献

负压伤口疗法治疗手术部位感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Lab for Trauma and Surgical Infections, Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):3980-3990. doi: 10.1111/jan.14876. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Negative pressure wound therapy is one of the most common treatments for infected wounds. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy with conventional treatment methods in the treatment of surgical site infection.

DESIGN

This study is registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

DATA SOURCES

The Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched.

METHODS

The systematic review was searched by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method. All trials reporting the use of negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infection treatment were included regardless of surgery type. The primary outcome measure was wound healing. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, medical costs, adverse events, and reoperation rates. Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals and report estimates as odds ratios. Heterogeneity was determined through the I test, with I  > 50% indicating substantial heterogeneity and p < .10 significance. The search was performed on 10 March 2020.

RESULTS

We identified 13 eligible trial comparisons, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 11 cohort study. Negative pressure wound therapy in surgical site infection (SSI) patients significantly increased wound healing rate, accelerated wound healing time, increased daily wound healing area, reduced hospital stay, and reduced adverse events. However, negative pressure wound therapy was associated with increased medical costs.

CONCLUSION

Negative pressure wound therapy may be more effective for the treatment of surgical site infection relative to conventional debridement, dressings and other treatments. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most optimal application of negative pressure wound therapy.

IMPACT

Negative pressure wound therapy is the best treatment strategy for surgical site infection. This study can improve medical practitioners' awareness of negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infection, promoting the development of relevant randomized controlled trials.

摘要

目的

负压伤口疗法是治疗感染性伤口最常用的方法之一。本荟萃分析的目的是比较负压伤口疗法与传统治疗方法在治疗手术部位感染方面的疗效。

设计

本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库中注册。

资料来源

检索了 Pubmed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。

方法

采用系统评价的首选报告项目方法进行系统检索。无论手术类型如何,所有报告使用负压伤口疗法治疗手术部位感染的试验均被纳入。主要结局指标是伤口愈合。次要结局指标是住院时间、医疗费用、不良事件和再次手术率。结果以 95%置信区间表示,并报告估计值为比值比。通过 I 检验确定异质性,I > 50%表示存在显著异质性,p <.10 表示有统计学意义。检索于 2020 年 3 月 10 日进行。

结果

我们确定了 13 项符合条件的试验比较,其中 2 项为随机对照试验,11 项为队列研究。负压伤口疗法治疗手术部位感染(SSI)患者时,显著提高了伤口愈合率,加快了伤口愈合时间,增加了每日伤口愈合面积,缩短了住院时间,并减少了不良事件。然而,负压伤口疗法与医疗费用增加有关。

结论

与传统清创、敷料和其他治疗方法相比,负压伤口疗法可能对治疗手术部位感染更有效。然而,需要进一步开展高质量的随机对照试验,以确定负压伤口疗法的最佳应用。

意义

负压伤口疗法是治疗手术部位感染的最佳治疗策略。本研究可以提高医疗从业者对手术部位感染负压伤口疗法的认识,促进相关随机对照试验的开展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验