Lougheed Jessica P, Chanut Justin, Truong Alyssa K
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada.
University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Affect Sci. 2025 May 22;6(2):285-295. doi: 10.1007/s42761-025-00306-z. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Stressor reactivity, the association between the experience of stressors and same-day changes in affect (Almeida et al., 2023), has been examined extensively. Much less research has examined the complementary process: the extent to which affect may influence the perception of stressors. We examined whether affect in daily life was related to the likelihood that individuals report stressors, and whether internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms) were associated with these links. Participants ( = 609) were recruited from an undergraduate participant pool and reported daily on their positive and negative affect, and the types of stressors they experienced, in a 14-day daily diary design. We used multilevel survival analysis (MSA) to estimate the likelihood of reporting recurring stressors from mean levels of positive and negative affect, the previous day's positive and negative affect, internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms), and interactions between previous day's affect and internalizing symptoms. Previous day's affect was not associated with the risk of reporting stressors. Greater negative affect at the between-person level was associated with a greater risk of all types of stressors we examined, whereas lower between-person positive affect was only associated with the risk of reporting work/school and any stressors. Depressive and anxious symptoms were related in different ways to the likelihood of reporting stressors. This study demonstrates the utility of daily diary methods in combination with MSA to examine directional associations from affect to stressors and their temporal links.
应激反应性,即应激源经历与当日情绪变化之间的关联(阿尔梅达等人,2023年),已得到广泛研究。而对于互补过程的研究则少得多:情绪在多大程度上可能影响对应激源的感知。我们研究了日常生活中的情绪是否与个体报告应激源的可能性相关,以及内化症状(抑郁和焦虑症状)是否与这些关联有关。参与者(n = 609)从本科参与群体中招募,并在一项为期14天的日常日记设计中,每日报告他们的积极和消极情绪,以及他们经历的应激源类型。我们使用多水平生存分析(MSA)来估计从积极和消极情绪的平均水平、前一天的积极和消极情绪、内化症状(抑郁和焦虑症状)以及前一天情绪与内化症状之间的相互作用中报告反复出现的应激源的可能性。前一天的情绪与报告应激源的风险无关。在个体层面上,更大的消极情绪与我们所研究的所有类型应激源的更高风险相关,而个体层面较低的积极情绪仅与报告工作/学校应激源和任何应激源的风险相关。抑郁和焦虑症状与报告应激源的可能性以不同方式相关。本研究证明了日常日记方法与MSA相结合在研究从情绪到应激源的方向性关联及其时间联系方面的效用。