Curtis William, Price Ryan, Kruger Eric, Paiz Christopher, Treme Gehron, Richter Dustin, Shultz Christopher
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, West Torrance, California, USA.
Iowa Orthop J. 2025;45(1):203-212.
While authors have subclassified long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) lesions in numerous ways, there is no classification system based solely on the arthroscopic appearance of the LHBT. We present a scoping review of the existing classification systems for LHBT tendinopathy and propose a novel classification based on its intraoperative, arthroscopic appearance.
We conducted a comprehensive search of classification systems for LHBT pathology using EMBASE and Ovid-Medline platforms. Our proposed classification system consists of four types based on intraoperative arthroscopic appearance of the LHBT: normal (A), erythema without fraying (B), fraying (C), and labral anchor instability (D). Fourteen arthroscopic videos and thirteen photos were reviewed by three orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons and two orthopaedic sports medicine fellows. Intra-and inter-observer reliability were assessed using Krippendorff's Alpha (α).
Seventeen full length articles were included in our review, including classification systems based on visual characteristics, advanced imaging, and histology. For our proposed classification, there was excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability between all reviewers (α=0.92). Interobserver reliability when reviewing arthroscopic photos was also excellent (α=0.81). There was excellent agreement for all reviewers between video and photo cases (α=0.81).
The current literature lacks a concise classification system for LHBT tendinopathy based on its intraoperative, arthroscopic appearance. Our proposed classification system is intended to offer a simple and reproducible way to describe LHBT tendinopathy based on intraoperative arthroscopic appearance of the tendon. This classification has excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability when reviewing arthroscopic video cases as well as excellent inter-observer reliability when reviewing arthroscopic photos. This serves as a validation of classification for a future planned randomized control trial comparing LHBT tenodesis to benign neglect in the setting of rotator cuff repair. .
虽然作者们以多种方式对肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHBT)损伤进行了亚分类,但尚无仅基于LHBT关节镜表现的分类系统。我们对现有的LHBT肌腱病分类系统进行了一项范围综述,并基于其术中关节镜表现提出了一种新的分类方法。
我们使用EMBASE和Ovid - Medline平台对LHBT病理的分类系统进行了全面搜索。我们提出的分类系统基于LHBT术中关节镜表现分为四种类型:正常(A)、无磨损的红斑(B)、磨损(C)和盂唇锚定不稳定(D)。14个关节镜视频和13张照片由三名骨科运动医学外科医生和两名骨科运动医学专科住院医生进行了评估。使用Krippendorff's Alpha(α)评估观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。
我们的综述纳入了17篇全文文章,包括基于视觉特征、高级影像学和组织学的分类系统。对于我们提出的分类,所有评估者之间的观察者间和观察者内可靠性都非常好(α = 0.92)。评估关节镜照片时的观察者间可靠性也非常好(α = 0.81)。所有评估者在视频和照片病例之间的一致性非常好(α = 0.81)。
目前的文献缺乏基于术中关节镜表现的LHBT肌腱病简明分类系统。我们提出的分类系统旨在提供一种简单且可重复的方法,以根据肌腱的术中关节镜表现来描述LHBT肌腱病。这种分类在评估关节镜视频病例时具有出色的观察者间和观察者内可靠性,在评估关节镜照片时也具有出色的观察者间可靠性。这为未来计划的一项随机对照试验的分类验证提供了依据,该试验将在肩袖修复的背景下比较LHBT固定术与保守观察。