Zhao Yushi, Gao Xueqin, Han Yong, Wang Ting
Institude of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology, Academy of Nutrition and Health, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identification and Control, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1543416. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1543416. eCollection 2025.
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis (NSCLC-LM).
A systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was executed until December 11, 2024. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies Of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Data extracted encompassed disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse events (AEs). A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis, which was conducted using STATA 15.1 software. Egger's and Begg's tests were used to analyze publication bias, and when significant publication bias was detected, the Trim and Fill method was employed to adjust for the bias.
This meta-analysis included 8 studies involving a total of 306 patients, with a pooled ORR of 57.6% (95% CI: 39.5%-74.7%). Further subgroup analysis revealed that a pemetrexed dosage of 40-50 mg exhibited superior efficacy, with an ORR of 84.5% (95% CI: 70.0%-95.6%), compared to an ORR of 46.6% (95% CI: 29.2%-64.4%) for dosages of 10-30 mg. Additionally, patients with EGFR mutations exhibited an ORR of 56.2% (95% CI: 34.7%-76.6%), while those with other genetic subtypes had an ORR of 44.8% (95% CI: 25.1%-65.1%). The combined DCR was 85.4% (95% CI: 76.5%-92.7). In terms of survival, the pooled data from 6 studies yielded a mOS of 8.12 months (95% CI: 6.07-10.17). Common adverse events associated with pemetrexed included myelosuppression (32.6%), headache (24.8%), abnormal transaminase (11.8%), nausea (7.3%), vomiting (11.7%), radiculitis (8.4%) and leukoencephalopathy (6.4%). Potential publication bias was identified for DCR and grade≥III myelosuppression. Subgroup analyses performed by DCR showed that the bias was related to drug dosage, while the Trim and Fill method for grade ≥III myelosuppression did not reverse the bias. These findings suggest that publication bias had minimal impact and that the results were relatively stable.
This meta-analysis concludes that patients with NSCLC-LM benefit from intrathecal chemotherapy using pemetrexed.
本荟萃分析旨在评估鞘内注射培美曲塞(IP)治疗非小细胞肺癌伴软脑膜转移(NSCLC-LM)患者的安全性和有效性。
对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库进行系统检索,直至2024年12月11日。使用干预性非随机研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估所选研究的质量。提取的数据包括疾病控制率(DCR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、中位总生存期(mOS)和不良事件(AE)。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型,使用STATA 15.1软件进行。采用Egger检验和Begg检验分析发表偏倚,当检测到显著的发表偏倚时,采用Trim和Fill方法调整偏倚。
本荟萃分析纳入8项研究,共306例患者,合并ORR为57.6%(95%CI:39.5%-74.7%)。进一步的亚组分析显示,培美曲塞剂量为40-50mg时疗效更佳,ORR为84.5%(95%CI:70.0%-95.6%),而剂量为十至30mg时ORR为46.6%(95%CI:29.2%-64.4%)。此外,EGFR突变患者的ORR为56.2%(95%CI:34.7%-76.6%),而其他基因亚型患者的ORR为44.8%(95%CI:25.1%-65.1%)。合并DCR为85.4%(95%CI:76.5%-92.7)。在生存方面,6项研究的汇总数据得出mOS为8.12个月(95%CI:6.07-10.17)。与培美曲塞相关的常见不良事件包括骨髓抑制(32.6%)、头痛(24.8%)、转氨酶异常(11.8%)、恶心(7.3%)、呕吐(11.7%)、神经根炎(8.4%)和白质脑病(6.4%)。在DCR和≥III级骨髓抑制方面发现了潜在的发表偏倚。按DCR进行的亚组分析表明,偏倚与药物剂量有关,而≥III级骨髓抑制的Trim和Fill方法并未消除偏倚。这些发现表明发表偏倚的影响最小,结果相对稳定。
本荟萃分析得出结论,NSCLC-LM患者从鞘内注射培美曲塞化疗中获益。