• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术中超声检查在腹腔镜非解剖性肝切除中的应用——来自波兰国家微创肝脏手术登记处的结果

Utility of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic nonanatomical liver resection - results from National Polish registry of minimally invasive liver surgery.

作者信息

Serednicki Wojciech A, Hołówko Wacław, Tarasik Aleksander, Pierściński Stanisław, Hogendorf Piotr, Mielko Jerzy, Wysocki Michał, Dąbrowska Anna, Pędziwiatr Michał

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jul 3;410(1):212. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03790-w.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03790-w
PMID:40608073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12226628/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), being an established method, strongly relies on preoperative and intraoperative imaging. The aim of this study is to assess the utility, with a primary focus on oncological radicality, of intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography (IOUS) in nonanatomical laparoscopic liver resections data based on National Polish Registry of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.

METHODS

An observational multicenter cohort study involving data from 8 Polish liver surgery departments was conducted. Patients who underwent minimally invasive nonanatomical liver resection in the years 2010-2024 in Poland were included in the research. Patients were divided into a control group without intraoperative ultrasonography and a study group with IOUS. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the perioperative results of IOUS usage in LLR.

RESULTS

Study results show that IOUS is associated with a considerably higher R0 resection margin (91,6% vs. 84,2%, p = 0,039) with, yet not statistically significant, but higher textbook outcome (82,8% vs. 78,2%, p = 0,258). Other results, such as intraoperative blood loss (median 200 ml vs. 150 ml, p = 0,62 and transfusion rate (9,3% vs. 9,7%, p = 0,896), as well as postoperative complications (11,2% vs. 11,6%, p = 0,175) were similar in both groups. IOUS is associated with longer operation time (median 200 min. vs. 140 min., p < 0,001), however, it is chosen by liver surgeons in more difficult cases (28,4% vs. 15,2% posterosuperior segments, p = 0,003).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasonography is a useful tool in non-anatomical liver surgery, that ensures oncologic radicality with similar other outcomes compared to no IOUS usage. Therefore, it should be considered as mandatory in LLR. Furthermore, IOUS training programmes should be weighed into being a part of LLR training programmes.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)作为一种成熟的手术方法,严重依赖术前和术中成像。本研究旨在基于波兰国家微创肝脏手术登记处的数据,评估术中腹腔镜超声检查(IOUS)在非解剖性腹腔镜肝切除术中的效用,主要关注肿瘤根治性。

方法

进行了一项观察性多中心队列研究,涉及来自8个波兰肝脏外科科室的数据。纳入2010年至2024年在波兰接受微创非解剖性肝切除术的患者。患者分为未进行术中超声检查的对照组和使用IOUS的研究组。进行统计分析以评估IOUS在LLR中的围手术期结果。

结果

研究结果表明,IOUS与显著更高的R0切除边缘相关(91.6%对84.2%,p = 0.039),教科书式结果虽无统计学意义但更高(82.8%对78.2%,p = 0.258)。两组的其他结果,如术中失血量(中位数200 ml对150 ml,p = 0.62)、输血率(9.3%对9.7%,p = 0.896)以及术后并发症(11.2%对11.6%,p = 0.175)相似。IOUS与更长的手术时间相关(中位数200分钟对140分钟,p < 0.001),然而,在更困难的病例中肝脏外科医生更倾向选择IOUS(后上段28.4%对15.2%,p = 0.003)。

结论

腹腔镜术中超声检查是非解剖性肝脏手术中的一种有用工具,与不使用IOUS相比,能确保肿瘤根治性且其他结果相似。因此,在LLR中应将其视为必需。此外应考虑将IOUS培训计划纳入LLR培训计划的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e1a/12226628/aaa648d00cd4/423_2025_3790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e1a/12226628/464b807f93f4/423_2025_3790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e1a/12226628/35c536480c74/423_2025_3790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e1a/12226628/aaa648d00cd4/423_2025_3790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e1a/12226628/464b807f93f4/423_2025_3790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e1a/12226628/35c536480c74/423_2025_3790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e1a/12226628/aaa648d00cd4/423_2025_3790_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Utility of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic nonanatomical liver resection - results from National Polish registry of minimally invasive liver surgery.术中超声检查在腹腔镜非解剖性肝切除中的应用——来自波兰国家微创肝脏手术登记处的结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jul 3;410(1):212. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03790-w.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
3
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移:基于倾向评分匹配分析的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.073. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Comparison of textbook outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.肝细胞癌患者腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术后教科书式结局的比较:一项多中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):2052-2061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11577-9. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
8
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Review of 103 Cases of Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.103例复发性肝细胞癌腹腔镜再次肝切除病例回顾
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):876-881. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0281. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Is operation time over the benchmark value a risk factor for worse short-term outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection?腹腔镜肝切除术后手术时间超过基准值是否是短期预后较差的风险因素?
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Mar;19(1):60-67. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2024.135446. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
2
Evolution of minimally invasive liver surgery in France over the last decade.过去十年法国微创肝外科的发展。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4457-4467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10951-3. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemihepatectomy: The ORANGE II PLUS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
腹腔镜与开腹半肝切除术的比较:ORANGE II PLUS 多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 20;42(15):1799-1809. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01019. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
4
Early adoption of laparoscopic liver surgery in Poland: a national retrospective cohort study.波兰早期采用腹腔镜肝脏手术:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 1;110(1):361-371. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000840.
5
Intraoperative Imaging in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.肝胆胰外科手术中的术中成像
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;15(14):3694. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143694.
6
Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center propensity score matching study.吲哚菁绿荧光引导下腹腔镜肝切除术与传统腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的单中心倾向评分匹配研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 19;12:930065. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.930065. eCollection 2022.
7
Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases.验证 IMM 分类在腹腔镜再次肝切除治疗结直肠癌肝转移中的应用。
Surgery. 2021 Nov;170(5):1448-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.034. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
Assessment of Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery.腹腔镜与开腹肝手术的教科书结局评估。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):e212064. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2064. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.微创肝切除术的学习曲线:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Apr 30;108(4):351-358. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa118.
10
The ILLS Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Fellow Skills Curriculum.ILLS 腹腔镜肝脏手术住院医师技能课程。
Ann Surg. 2020 Nov;272(5):786-792. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004175.