Suppr超能文献

复发急性白血病的二次异基因移植——值得冒险一试吗?

Second allogeneic transplantation in relapsed acute leukemia - a risk worth taking?

作者信息

Zielińska Patrycja, Gruenpeter Karolina, Wieczorkiewicz-Kabut Agata, Białas Krzysztof, Koclęga Anna, Noster Izabela, Szewczyk Izabela, Boral Kinga, Wiśniewska-Piąty Katarzyna, Butrym Aleksandra, Czyż Jarosław, Lutwin Ewa, Helbig Grzegorz

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Silesia, Dąbrowski Street 25, Katowice, 40-032, Poland.

Department of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Wrocław Medical University, Wałbrzych, Poland.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06468-x.

Abstract

Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT2) presents a potentially curative treatment approach in patients who relapsed after first allogeneic transplant procedure. Currently there is no consensus on second allografting. The aim of our study was to analyze the outcome and prognostic factors of SCT2 in relapsed acute leukemia setting. The study comprised 60 patients at a median age of 44.7 years (37 females, 23 males) who underwent SCT2 due to relapsed acute leukemia between 2000 and 2024 in our center. Median remission duration after SCT1 was 13.6 (IQR 30.1) months and median time from relapse to SCT2 was 4 (IQR 3) months. Disease-risk index at SCT2 was as follows: low - 2 (3.3%), intermediate - 29 (48,4%), high - 27 (45%) and very high - 2 (3.3%). The same donor was used in 52 procedures (86.7%). Six patients died before engraftment due to severe infectious complications. The 2-year probability of overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) were 26.6% and 26.2%, respectively. Median follow-up after SCT2 was 10.7 (IQR 35) months. At the last follow-up, 22 patients (37%) were alive. The 2-year cumulative relapse incidence (RI) was 47.4% and cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 55.3%. The factors that adversely influenced survival were as follows: early relapse after SCT1 (< 6 months after transplantation) (p = 0.018) and the use of reduced intensity conditioning before SCT2 (p = 0.0272). Presented data indicate that second allograft is a feasible option in selected patients with relapsed acute leukemia. There is still room for improvement in terms of non-relapse mortality.

摘要

第二次异基因干细胞移植(SCT2)为首次异基因移植术后复发的患者提供了一种潜在的治愈性治疗方法。目前对于第二次同种异体移植尚无共识。我们研究的目的是分析复发急性白血病情况下SCT2的疗效及预后因素。该研究纳入了60例患者,中位年龄44.7岁(女性37例,男性23例),2000年至2024年期间在我们中心因复发急性白血病接受了SCT2。SCT1后的中位缓解持续时间为13.6(四分位间距30.1)个月,从复发到SCT2的中位时间为4(四分位间距3)个月。SCT2时的疾病风险指数如下:低危 - 2例(3.3%),中危 - 29例(48.4%),高危 - 27例(45%),极高危 - 2例(3.3%)。52例手术(86.7%)使用了同一供者。6例患者因严重感染并发症在植入前死亡。2年总生存(OS)率和无白血病生存(LFS)率分别为26.6%和26.2%。SCT2后的中位随访时间为10.7(四分位间距35)个月。在最后一次随访时,22例患者(37%)存活。2年累积复发率(RI)为47.4%,累积非复发死亡率(NRM)为55.3%。对生存产生不利影响的因素如下:SCT1后早期复发(移植后<6个月)(p = 0.018)以及SCT2前使用减低强度预处理(p = 0.0272)。呈现的数据表明,第二次同种异体移植对于部分复发急性白血病患者是一种可行的选择。在非复发死亡率方面仍有改善空间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验