Suppr超能文献

50岁及以上成年人使用24价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的成本效益和预算影响分析。

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of the 24-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in adults aged 50 and older.

作者信息

Altawalbeh Shoroq M, Wateska Angela R, Nowalk Mary Patricia, Lin Chyongchiou J, Harrison Lee H, Schaffner William, Zimmerman Richard K, Smith Kenneth J

机构信息

Jordan University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Irbid, Jordan.

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2025 Aug 13;61:127433. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127433. Epub 2025 Jul 1.

Abstract

A 24-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV24) is currently in development and could potentially be used in all adults aged 50 years and older. This study evaluated risk- and age-based PCV24 use to ascertain its potential public health effects, budget impact, and cost-effectiveness. A Markov decision analysis model compared PCV24 and all currently recommended pneumococcal vaccines. Age-based vaccination could occur at age 50 or at ages 50 and 65. The analysis separately examined hypothetical cohorts of U.S. Black and non-Black individuals with and without consideration of childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects, using race-specific pneumococcal disease and vaccination data. Cohorts were tracked over a lifetime horizon from both societal and healthcare perspectives. Model parameters were derived from U.S. data and parameter uncertainty was evaluated through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Budgetary impact of 21-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV21), PCV24, and combinations of both at different ratios was also assessed. From societal and healthcare perspectives, PCV24 prevented fewer pneumococcal disease cases and deaths but was less economically favorable than strategies using PCV21. Other vaccines were similarly less favorable than PCV21. When adding childhood vaccination indirect effects, PCV24 strategies remained unfavorable compared to PCV21 strategies. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, PCV21 at ages 50 and 65 was preferred in 99 % of model iterations for Black cohorts and 85 % for non-Blacks at a $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. Budget impact for PCV24 and PCV21 were not substantially different but PCV21 prevented more hospitalizations and deaths. Compared to PCV21, which is formulated solely on adult pneumococcal epidemiology, PCV24 and other childhood epidemiology-formulated vaccines were less economically favorable among adults aged 50 and older. Budget impacts of PCV21 and PCV24 use were similar.

摘要

一种24价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV24)目前正在研发中,可能会用于所有50岁及以上的成年人。本研究评估了基于风险和年龄的PCV24使用情况,以确定其潜在的公共卫生影响、预算影响和成本效益。一个马尔可夫决策分析模型对PCV24和所有目前推荐的肺炎球菌疫苗进行了比较。基于年龄的疫苗接种可以在50岁时进行,也可以在50岁和65岁时进行。该分析分别考察了美国黑人和非黑人的假设队列,同时考虑和不考虑儿童肺炎球菌疫苗接种的间接影响,使用特定种族的肺炎球菌疾病和疫苗接种数据。从社会和医疗保健角度对队列进行了终身跟踪。模型参数来自美国数据,并通过确定性和概率敏感性分析评估参数不确定性。还评估了21价结合疫苗(PCV21)、PCV24以及两者不同比例组合的预算影响。从社会和医疗保健角度来看,PCV24预防的肺炎球菌疾病病例和死亡较少,但在经济上不如使用PCV21的策略有利。其他疫苗在经济上也同样不如PCV21有利。当加入儿童疫苗接种的间接影响时,与PCV21策略相比,PCV24策略仍然不利。在概率敏感性分析中,在100,000美元/质量调整生命年的支付意愿阈值下,对于黑人队列,99%的模型迭代首选50岁和65岁时接种PCV21,对于非黑人则为85%。PCV24和PCV21的预算影响没有实质性差异,但PCV21预防了更多的住院和死亡。与仅根据成人肺炎球菌流行病学制定的PCV21相比,PCV24和其他根据儿童流行病学制定的疫苗在50岁及以上成年人中在经济上不太有利。PCV21和PCV24使用的预算影响相似。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验