• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民对遗传资源惠益分享的共识与分歧观点。

Citizen consensus and diverging views on benefit-sharing for genetic resources.

作者信息

Abatayo Anna Lou, Ding Xiaolongren, Neira-Monsalve Esteban, Richter Andries

机构信息

Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, 6706KN, the Netherlands.

Business Economics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, 6706 KN, the Netherlands.

出版信息

NPJ Biodivers. 2025 Jul 3;4(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s44185-025-00093-7.

DOI:10.1038/s44185-025-00093-7
PMID:40610754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12226334/
Abstract

The governance of genetic resources and their digital sequence information (DSI) faces challenges in achieving globally equitable benefit-sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity. Citizens in nine countries across the Global North and South reveal diverging preferences on whether a benefit-sharing system should rely on monetary or non-monetary contributions, and whether governments should be responsible for payments. However, consensus emerges in favor of criteria-based DSI allocations and designated funding purposes.

摘要

遗传资源及其数字序列信息(DSI)的治理在根据《生物多样性公约》实现全球公平利益分享方面面临挑战。全球北方和南方九个国家的公民在利益分享系统应依赖货币还是非货币贡献以及政府是否应负责支付方面表现出不同的偏好。然而,出现了支持基于标准的DSI分配和指定资金用途的共识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd97/12229591/89d8dd27dd90/44185_2025_93_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd97/12229591/e8aa89b43649/44185_2025_93_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd97/12229591/89d8dd27dd90/44185_2025_93_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd97/12229591/e8aa89b43649/44185_2025_93_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd97/12229591/89d8dd27dd90/44185_2025_93_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Citizen consensus and diverging views on benefit-sharing for genetic resources.公民对遗传资源惠益分享的共识与分歧观点。
NPJ Biodivers. 2025 Jul 3;4(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s44185-025-00093-7.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Global patterns in access and benefit-sharing: a comprehensive review of national policies.获取与惠益分享的全球模式:国家政策的全面审查
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 4;3(1):e001800. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001800. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries .通过绩效付费来改善低收入和中等收入国家的卫生干预措施提供情况 。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD007899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007899.pub2.
5
Developing a contextually and culturally relevant benefit-sharing framework for pathogen genomic research and biobanking in africa: a deliberative expert approach.为非洲病原体基因组研究和生物样本库制定与背景和文化相关的利益分享框架:一种专家审议方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 3;26(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01238-w.
6
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
7
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Don't rush rules for sharing digital genetic-sequence information.不要急于制定数字基因序列信息共享规则。
Nature. 2024 Oct;634(8034):513-514. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-03331-3.
2
Harmonize rules for digital sequence information benefit-sharing across UN frameworks.协调联合国各框架下数字序列信息惠益分享的规则。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 9;15(1):8745. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52994-z.
3
New benefit-sharing principles for digital sequence information.数字序列信息的新利益分享原则。
Science. 2023 Nov 3;382(6670):520-522. doi: 10.1126/science.adj1331. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Digital Sequence Information and the Access and Benefit-Sharing Obligation of the Convention on Biological Diversity.数字序列信息与《生物多样性公约》的获取与惠益分享义务
Nanoethics. 2023;17(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11569-023-00436-3. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
International agreements and the plant genetics research community: A guide to practice.国际协议与植物遗传学研究共同体:实践指南。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 4;120(14):e2205773119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205773119. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
6
Multilateral benefit-sharing from digital sequence information will support both science and biodiversity conservation.从数字序列信息中实现多边惠益分享将有助于科学和生物多样性保护。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 23;13(1):1086. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28594-0.
7
Digital biopiracy and the (dis)assembling of the Nagoya Protocol.数字生物剽窃与《名古屋议定书》的(解)构
Geoforum. 2020 Dec;117:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 6.