Toyooka Seikai, Masuda Hironari, Arai Noriaki, Osaki Yutoshi, Ando Shuji, Kawano Hirotaka, Nakagawa Takumi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Teikyo University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Department of Information Engineering Tokyo University of Science Tokyo Japan.
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 2;12(3):e70315. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70315. eCollection 2025 Jul.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the gap balance after implantation in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) via functional alignment (FA) by comparing the virtual gap in preoperative simulation. To facilitate the evaluation of balance characteristics, a control group consisted of patients who underwent anatomical alignment (AA) with the articular surfaces tilted medially and set up in neutral alignment.
We retrospectively analyzed data from 321 consecutive knees of patients with varus knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary cruciate-retaining TKA from September 2017 to July 2023. The FA group included 140 knees that were operated on via a robotic arm based on kinematic alignment, and the AA group included 93 knees that were operated on via a navigation system. The two groups were stratified according to the timing of surgery that corresponded to changes in the surgeon's surgical technique. After osteotomy, the implant gap was measured via a digital tensioner at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° flexion angles with 30 pounds of tension stress applied, and the gaps were compared between the two groups.
The gap between the implants in the medial compartment was stable in FA, with no widening of more than 2 mm, including the mid-flexion position. In AA, the gap tended to open with flexion and was significantly larger than in FA at 60° (FA: 1.1 ± 1.5 mm, AA: 1.8 ± 1.9 mm), 90° (FA: 1.2 ± 1.5 mm, AA: 2.2 ± 2.0 mm) and 120° (FA: 1.4 ± 1.6 mm, AA: 2.8 ± 2.1 mm) ( < 0.05). In the lateral compartment, the gap was significantly larger in AA than in FA at all the angles ( < 0.05).
Compared with AA, FA achieved balance at all knee flexion angles. FA can achieve a well-balanced knee with high reproducibility and may allow the surgeon to consistently obtain better balance.
Level III prospective cohort study.
本研究旨在通过比较术前模拟中的虚拟间隙,评估全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者采用功能对线(FA)植入后的间隙平衡情况。为便于评估平衡特征,设立了一个对照组,该组由关节面内侧倾斜并设置为中立对线的解剖学对线(AA)患者组成。
我们回顾性分析了2017年9月至2023年7月期间接受初次保留交叉韧带TKA的321例内翻膝骨关节炎患者连续膝关节的数据。FA组包括140例通过基于运动学对线的机器人手臂进行手术的膝关节,AA组包括93例通过导航系统进行手术的膝关节。根据与外科医生手术技术变化相对应的手术时间对两组进行分层。截骨后,使用数字张力器在0°、30°、60°、90°和120°屈曲角度施加30磅张力应力时测量植入物间隙,并比较两组之间的间隙。
FA组内侧间室植入物之间的间隙稳定,包括屈膝中间位置在内,增宽不超过2毫米。在AA组中,间隙倾向于随屈曲而张开,在60°(FA组:1.1±1.5毫米,AA组:1.8±1.9毫米)、90°(FA组:1.2±1.5毫米,AA组:2.2±2.0毫米)和120°(FA组:1.4±1.6毫米,AA组:2.8±2.1毫米)时显著大于FA组(P<0.05)。在外侧间室,AA组在所有角度的间隙均显著大于FA组(P<0.05)。
与AA相比,FA在所有膝关节屈曲角度均实现了平衡。FA可以实现具有高重现性的良好平衡的膝关节,并且可能使外科医生始终获得更好的平衡。
III级前瞻性队列研究。