Suppr超能文献

急诊科血培养阳性的临床意义回顾性分析:一项单中心研究

Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Karlath Farha Ahmed, Rehan Mehboob Ahmed, Geigor Annie, Mitchell Michael J, Arnaout Sami, Greenough Thomas C, Ellison Richard T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, United Regional Healthcare System, Wichita Falls, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 17;12(7):ofaf352. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf352. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been major advances in blood culture technology in the last decade, with both faster and more sensitive pathogen detection as well as more precise species identification. We have reassessed the results of positive blood cultures in this new clinical microbiology era with a focus on contaminant identification.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted including all patients with a blood culture collected in 2 UMass Memorial Health emergency departments from September 2019 through April 2020. Contaminants were identified based on standard clinical microbiology laboratory criteria and independent retrospective review by 3 infectious disease (ID) physicians and an ID fellow.

RESULTS

Of 5673 blood samples obtained, 5661 were analyzed after 12 were deemed inconclusive by the ID physician review. Blood culture contaminants accounted for 22.5% of the positive blood cultures. was the most frequent contaminant (33.4%), while was the most frequent pathogen (21%) causing true bacteremia. Coagulase-negative staphylococci remain the most frequent cause of blood culture contamination with being the most common. The species and were all determined to be contaminants in 100% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The improvements in clinical laboratory technology enable better discrimination of the relative pathogenicity of differing coagulase-negative staphylococci species.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,血培养技术取得了重大进展,病原体检测更快、更灵敏,菌种鉴定也更精确。在这个新的临床微生物学时代,我们重新评估了阳性血培养结果,重点是污染物鉴定。

方法

进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了2019年9月至2020年4月在马萨诸塞大学纪念医疗中心2个急诊科采集血培养的所有患者。根据标准临床微生物学实验室标准以及3名传染病医生和1名传染病专科住院医生的独立回顾性审查来鉴定污染物。

结果

在获取的5673份血样中,12份经传染病医生审查判定为不确定后,对5661份进行了分析。血培养污染物占阳性血培养的22.5%。 是最常见的污染物(33.4%),而 是引起真正菌血症的最常见病原体(21%)。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌仍然是血培养污染的最常见原因,其中 最为常见。 菌种和 在所有病例中均被确定为污染物。

结论

临床实验室技术的改进能够更好地区分不同凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌种的相对致病性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9845/12225663/c31b1089a616/ofaf352f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验