Wang Yiqing, Kuo Braden, Berschback Madeline, Huttenhower Curtis, Chan Andrew T, Staller Kyle
Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gastroenterology. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.06.020.
Current literature on diet-constipation associations is limited by small sample sizes and cross-sectional designs. We aimed to comprehensively examine the associations between five dietary patterns, their components, and incident constipation.
In three large cohorts, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHSII, and the Health Professional Follow-up Study (HPFS), we identified chronic constipation based on repeatedly-measured self-reported constipation symptoms for ≥12 weeks in the past year. We assessed long-term adherence to five dietary patterns (alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED), low-carbohydrate diet (LCD), Western diet (WD)) and indices (plant-based dietary index (PDI), empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP)) using validated quadrennial food frequency questionnaires. We used a log-binomial model adjusted for a wide range of confounders, including fiber or ultra-processed food (UPF) intake, to estimate relative risk (95% confidence interval) for constipation.
In the pooled cohort of 27,774 (78.4±5.6y) NHS, 55,906 (60.5±4.6y) NHSII, and 12,237 (78.6±5.6y) HPFS participants, we documented 7,519 incident constipation cases after 2-4 years of follow-up. Compared to the lowest quintiles, the top quintiles of aMED and PDI were associated with 16% (9-22%) and 20% (14-27%) reduced risk for constipation, whereas the top quintiles of EDIP, WD, and LCD were associated with 24% (15-33%), 22% (11-33%), and 3% (-3-11%) increased risk for constipation, respectively. These associations were independent of total fiber or UPF intake. Vegetable and nut intake, which are enriched in aMED and PDI, were associated with decreased constipation risks.
Our findings suggest that dietary patterns emphasizing plant-based foods and healthy fats may protect against constipation, informing future dietary interventions and treatments for chronic constipation.
当前关于饮食与便秘关联的文献受样本量小和横断面设计的限制。我们旨在全面研究五种饮食模式、其组成成分与便秘发生率之间的关联。
在三项大型队列研究中,即护士健康研究(NHS)、护士健康研究II(NHSII)和卫生专业人员随访研究(HPFS),我们根据过去一年中自我报告的便秘症状重复测量≥12周来确定慢性便秘。我们使用经过验证的每四年一次的食物频率问卷评估对五种饮食模式(交替地中海饮食(aMED)、低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)、西方饮食(WD))和指数(植物性饮食指数(PDI)、经验性饮食炎症模式(EDIP))的长期依从性。我们使用对数二项模型,对包括纤维或超加工食品(UPF)摄入量在内的多种混杂因素进行调整,以估计便秘的相对风险(95%置信区间)。
在由27774名(78.4±5.6岁)NHS参与者、55906名(60.5±4.6岁)NHSII参与者和12237名(78.6±5.6岁)HPFS参与者组成的汇总队列中,经过2至4年的随访,我们记录了7519例便秘病例。与最低五分位数相比,aMED和PDI的最高五分位数与便秘风险降低16%(9%-22%)和20%(14%-27%)相关,而EDIP、WD和LCD的最高五分位数分别与便秘风险增加24%(15%-33%)、22%(11%-33%)和3%(-3%-11%)相关。这些关联独立于总纤维或UPF摄入量。aMED和PDI中富含的蔬菜和坚果摄入量与便秘风险降低相关。
我们的研究结果表明,强调植物性食物和健康脂肪的饮食模式可能预防便秘,为未来慢性便秘的饮食干预和治疗提供参考。