• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往远端胃切除术后患者行远端胰腺切除术后残胃缺血性坏死的风险分析:日本胰腺外科学会多中心回顾性调查

A Risk Analysis for Ischemic Necrosis of the Remnant Stomach After Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients With Previous Distal Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Survey by the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.

作者信息

Kishi Takashi, Tajima Yoshitsugu, Hayashi Hikota, Kawabata Yasunari, Uemura Kenichiro, Nagai Minako, Nishio Kohei, Fukuzawa Kengo, Yagi Shintaro, Hidaka Masaaki

机构信息

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Sep;32(9):679-688. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12182. Epub 2025 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12182
PMID:40616248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12466842/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy (DG) which receives its blood supply mainly from the splenic artery (SPA), is at high risk for gastric ischemia following distal pancreatectomy (DP). We investigated the risk factors for ischemic necrosis of the remnant stomach (INS) during or after DP in DG patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS: We collected 414 patients who underwent DP after DG between July 2009 and December 2019 by distributing questionnaires to members of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery (JSPS) in 2020, and the risk factors for INS were analyzed in 364 eligible patients.

RESULTS

INS developed in 17 (4.7%) patients. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that dissection of the left inferior phrenic artery (LIPA) during DP (odds ratio [OR] 51.9, p < 0.001), current DP for pancreatic cancer (OR 6.19, p = 0.017), and previous DG for gastric cancer (OR 6.12, p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for INS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of the LIPA is necessary to avoid INS when DP is performed in DG patients. Additionally, careful surgical management is required in patients undergoing DP for pancreatic cancer and who have undergone DG for gastric cancer because they are candidates for INS after DP.

摘要

背景/目的:远端胃切除术后(DG)的残胃主要由脾动脉(SPA)供血,在远端胰腺切除术后(DP)发生胃缺血的风险较高。我们研究了DG患者在DP期间或之后发生残胃缺血性坏死(INS)的危险因素。

患者/方法:我们通过向日本胰腺外科学会(JSPS)成员发放问卷,收集了2009年7月至2019年12月期间接受DG后再行DP的414例患者,并对364例符合条件的患者分析了INS的危险因素。

结果

17例(4.7%)患者发生了INS。多因素logistic回归分析显示,DP期间解剖左膈下动脉(LIPA)(比值比[OR]51.9,p<0.001)、当前因胰腺癌行DP(OR 6.19,p = 0.017)以及既往因胃癌行DG(OR 6.12,p = 0.017)是INS的独立危险因素。

结论

在DG患者中进行DP时,保留LIPA对于避免INS是必要的。此外,对于因胰腺癌行DP且既往因胃癌行DG的患者,需要进行仔细的手术管理,因为他们是DP后发生INS的高危人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dac/12466842/f11a35df1356/JHBP-32-679-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dac/12466842/f11a35df1356/JHBP-32-679-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dac/12466842/f11a35df1356/JHBP-32-679-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Risk Analysis for Ischemic Necrosis of the Remnant Stomach After Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients With Previous Distal Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Survey by the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.既往远端胃切除术后患者行远端胰腺切除术后残胃缺血性坏死的风险分析:日本胰腺外科学会多中心回顾性调查
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Sep;32(9):679-688. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12182. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
2
Stapler versus scalpel resection followed by handsewn closure of the pancreatic remnant for distal pancreatectomy.在远端胰腺切除术中,吻合器与手术刀切除后手工缝合胰腺残端的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 10;6(6):CD008688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008688.pub3.
3
Stapler versus scalpel resection followed by hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant for distal pancreatectomy.用于远端胰腺切除术的吻合器与手术刀切除联合手工缝合胰腺残端闭合术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD008688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008688.pub2.
4
Is preservation of the remnant stomach safe during distal pancreatectomy in patients who have undergone distal gastrectomy?远端胰腺切除术后保留残胃在既往行远端胃切除术后患者中是否安全?
World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):430-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1860-1.
5
Uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.远端胃癌切除术后未切割 Roux-en-Y 重建。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 29;2(2):CD015014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015014.pub2.
6
Assessment of Remnant Gastric Perfusion Using Indocyanine Green During Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Gastrectomy: A Case Report.胃切除术后胰十二指肠切除术中使用吲哚菁绿评估残胃灌注:一例报告
Anticancer Res. 2025 Sep;45(9):4057-4062. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17763.
7
Splenic vessels preserving versus Warshaw technique in spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术中外伤性脾动静脉结扎与 Warshaw 技术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jul;103:106686. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106686. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD011391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2.
9
Ligation of the Pancreatic Stump With Quantified Force During Distal Pancreatectomy for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Protocol for a Single-Center Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Study.远端胰腺切除术中定量用力结扎胰腺残端预防术后胰瘘:单中心非随机对照临床研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 8;14:e74018. doi: 10.2196/74018.
10
Does Total Gastrectomy Provide Better Outcomes than Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy for Distal Gastric Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对于远端胃癌,全胃切除术比远端次全胃切除术能带来更好的治疗效果吗?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0165179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165179. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Splenic Vessels Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy in a Post-Distal Gastrectomy Patient.机器人保脾脾血管远端胰腺切除术在胃切除术后患者中的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6680-6681. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13802-y. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Safety of performing distal pancreatosplenectomy in patients who underwent distal gastrectomy previously: a multicenter cohort analysis with systematic literature review.既往接受过远端胃切除术的患者行远端胰腺脾切除术的安全性:一项多中心队列分析及系统文献综述
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Sep;103(3):145-152. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.3.145. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in patients with radical subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
腹腔镜下远端胰腺脾切除术治疗因胃癌行根治性胃大部切除术的左侧胰腺癌患者。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 Nov 30;26(4):395-400. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-016. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
4
Pancreatic Cancer: A Review.胰腺癌:综述。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 7;326(9):851-862. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13027.
5
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of vessels supplying the remnant stomach that were performed during distal pancreatectomy in a patient with a history of distal gastrectomy: a case report.术中吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光血管造影和数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查残胃供血血管:附胃切除术后胰体尾切除术 1 例报告。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec;14(6):1749-1755. doi: 10.1007/s12328-021-01493-5. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
6
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging ensures perfusion of the remnant stomach during laparoscopic splenectomy in a patient after distal gastrectomy: A case report.吲哚菁绿荧光成像确保远端胃切除术后患者腹腔镜脾切除术中残胃的灌注:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Jul;84:106111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106111. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
The inferior phrenic arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.膈下动脉:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Anat. 2021 May;235:151679. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151679. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
8
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
Feasibility of preserving the remnant stomach during distal pancreatectomy after distal gastrectomy.胃切除术后行胰体尾切除术时保留残胃的可行性。
Surg Today. 2020 Nov;50(11):1394-1401. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02016-4. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
Usefulness of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging: A case of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy after distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy.吲哚菁绿荧光成像的效用:1例胰体尾联合脾脏切除术后腹腔镜远端胃切除术病例
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Aug;11(3):252-255. doi: 10.1111/ases.12447. Epub 2017 Dec 6.