• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间和风险偏好的差异:不同性别的医生与普通人群

Difference in time and risk preferences: physicians and general population across genders.

作者信息

Kasahara Shingo, Kato Hirotaka, Goto Rei

机构信息

Graduate School of Business Administration, Keio University, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 223-8521, Japan.

School of Economics and Business Administration, Yokohama City University, 22-2 Seto, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0027, Japan.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00653-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13561-025-00653-4
PMID:40616619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12228394/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The alignment of preferences between physicians and patients can cause variations in treatment decision-making, thereby affecting health outcomes. However, research on the differences in preferences between physicians and the general population is scarce. This study examines the risk and time preferences of physicians compared with those of the general population, exploring the influence of gender concordance on health outcomes and decision-making in healthcare.

METHODS

We conducted an online field experiment in October and November 2022 in Japan and analyzed the responses of 469 individuals, including physicians and the general population. The survey was stratified by age and gender to align with the demographics of physicians nationally. Participants' preferences were measured across the health and monetary domains by using a modified multiple price list test format.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that physicians tended to be more risk-averse than the general population in the health and monetary domains, although no statistically significant differences were observed. Physicians were found to be statistically significantly future-oriented, particularly regarding their significant health or monetary gains. Furthermore, while the female general population was more risk-averse in both domains, a gender difference in the physician group was observed only in the monetary domain.

CONCLUSION

The results affirm that preference differences between physicians and the general population exist in Japan and clarify the unique preference traits of female physicians.

摘要

背景

医生与患者之间偏好的一致性会导致治疗决策的差异,从而影响健康结果。然而,关于医生与普通人群偏好差异的研究却很匮乏。本研究考察了医生与普通人群相比的风险和时间偏好,探讨了性别一致性对医疗保健中健康结果和决策的影响。

方法

2022年10月和11月,我们在日本进行了一项在线实地实验,并分析了包括医生和普通人群在内的469名个体的回复。调查按年龄和性别分层,以符合全国医生的人口统计学特征。通过使用改良的多重价格列表测试形式,在健康和货币领域测量参与者的偏好。

结果

研究结果显示,在健康和货币领域,医生往往比普通人群更厌恶风险,尽管未观察到统计学上的显著差异。发现医生在统计学上显著更注重未来,尤其是在涉及重大健康或货币收益方面。此外,虽然女性普通人群在两个领域都更厌恶风险,但仅在货币领域观察到医生群体存在性别差异。

结论

结果证实了日本医生与普通人群之间存在偏好差异,并阐明了女性医生独特的偏好特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da6a/12228394/f5e83a72d6d1/13561_2025_653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da6a/12228394/f5e83a72d6d1/13561_2025_653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da6a/12228394/f5e83a72d6d1/13561_2025_653_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Difference in time and risk preferences: physicians and general population across genders.时间和风险偏好的差异:不同性别的医生与普通人群
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00653-4.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.
4
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
5
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
When women take over: Physician gender and health care provision.当女性掌权时:医生性别与医疗服务提供
J Health Econ. 2025 Aug;102:103000. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103000. Epub 2025 May 10.
2
Motherhood penalty for female physicians in Japan: evidence from a medical school's alumni data.日本女医生的生育惩罚:医学院校友数据的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11622-8.
3
Characteristics of Medical School Deans and University Hospital Directors in Japan.日本医学院院长和大学医院院长的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2351526. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51526.
4
The stability of physicians' risk attitudes across time and domains.医生风险态度在时间和领域上的稳定性。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;339:116381. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116381. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
5
Decomposing social risk preferences for health and wealth.分解健康和财富的社会风险偏好。
J Health Econ. 2023 Jul;90:102757. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102757. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
6
Inequities in surgical outcomes by race and sex in the United States: retrospective cohort study.美国手术结果的种族和性别不平等:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 1;380:e073290. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073290.
7
Valuation of health losses of women with multiple roles using a well-being valuation approach: Evidence from Japan.采用福利估值法评估具有多重角色的女性的健康损失:来自日本的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251468. eCollection 2021.
8
Association of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Concordance Between Patients and Physicians With Patient Experience Ratings.患者与医生的种族/民族和性别一致性与患者体验评分的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24583.
9
How is increased selectivity of medical school admissions associated with physicians' career choice? A Japanese experience.医学院招生的选择性增加如何与医生的职业选择相关?日本的经验。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 May 27;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00480-0.
10
A comparison of professional and private time preferences of General Practitioners.比较全科医生的职业时间偏好和私人时间偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:256-264. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 12.