Karaaslan Gözde, Fidan Muhammet, Ayar Muhammet Kerim
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Usak University, Usak, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1110. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06237-2.
Prolonged exposure to coffee can lead to pronounced color changes and increased surface roughness in resin composites (RCs), effects that may be worsened by certain preheating methods. Although preheating is used to facilitate handling and enhance polymerization, evidence regarding its long-term impact on color stability and surface properties remains limited. This study investigates how different preheating approaches affect the esthetic performance and surface roughness of RCs, providing insights to guide clinical practice.
Four RCs (GrandioSO, Admira Fusion, Admira Fusion Xtra, VisCalor Bulk) were tested. Each RC was divided into three subgroups according to the preheating condition: two different devices (Caps Warmer and VisCalor Dispenser) and a non-preheated group. These were then split into two subgroups (distilled water and coffee) for storage (n = 8), resulting in 192 disc-shaped specimens. In the Caps Warmer group, preheating was done at 68 °C for 3 min, whereas in the VisCalor Dispenser group, it was done at 68 °C for 30 s. All RCs were immersed in coffee for 10 and 30 days. Color measurements were conducted at baseline (T1), 10 days (T2) and 30 days (T3) after immersion. Color differences (ΔE₀₀) were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula and a profilometer assessed surface roughness (Ra). Statistical analyses were performed using Multivariate and Robust ANOVA (p < 0.05).
The highest ΔE value was observed in the VisCalor Dispenser×VisCalor Bulk group at T1-T3 (6.18 ± 1.02, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference between Caps Warmer×VisCalor Bulk (5.03 ± 0.9). The Admira Fusion×non-preheated×distilled water group showed the lowest ΔE value at T1-T2 (0.57 ± 0.21, p < 0.001). Except for the Admira Fusion and preheating interaction, ΔE above the clinically acceptable level (> 1.8) was observed for all composite-preheating combinations after 10 days of coffee exposure. GrandioSO exhibited the lowest Ra values among tested RCs (0.546 ± 0.05, p < 0.001).
Using preheating devices may increase color changes in resin composites, particularly after prolonged immersion in a staining medium like coffee. Selecting an appropriate preheating method for timing and usability may be crucial for maintaining color stability. This study underscores the importance of considering both material choice and preheating technique in clinical applications to minimize discoloration risk.
长期接触咖啡会导致树脂复合材料(RCs)出现明显的颜色变化和表面粗糙度增加,某些预热方法可能会使这些影响加剧。尽管预热用于便于操作和增强聚合,但关于其对颜色稳定性和表面性能的长期影响的证据仍然有限。本研究调查了不同的预热方法如何影响RCs的美学性能和表面粗糙度,为指导临床实践提供见解。
测试了四种RCs(GrandioSO、Admira Fusion、Admira Fusion Xtra、VisCalor Bulk)。每种RC根据预热条件分为三个亚组:两种不同的设备(Caps Warmer和VisCalor Dispenser)和一个未预热组。然后将它们分成两个亚组(蒸馏水和咖啡)进行储存(n = 8),得到192个圆盘形试样。在Caps Warmer组中,在68°C下预热3分钟,而在VisCalor Dispenser组中,在68°C下预热30秒。所有RCs均浸泡在咖啡中10天和30天。在浸泡后的基线(T1)、10天(T2)和30天(T3)进行颜色测量。使用CIEDE2000公式计算颜色差异(ΔE₀₀),并使用轮廓仪评估表面粗糙度(Ra)。使用多变量和稳健方差分析进行统计分析(p < 0.05)。
在T1 - T3时,VisCalor Dispenser×VisCalor Bulk组观察到最高的ΔE值(6.18 ± 1.02,p < 0.001)。然而,Caps Warmer×VisCalor Bulk组之间没有差异(5.03 ± 0.9)。Admira Fusion×未预热×蒸馏水组在T1 - T2时显示出最低的ΔE值(0.57 ± 0.21,p < 0.001)。除了Admira Fusion和预热的相互作用外,在咖啡暴露10天后,所有复合材料 - 预热组合的ΔE均高于临床可接受水平(> 1.8)。GrandioSO在测试的RCs中表现出最低的Ra值(0.546 ± 0.05,p < 0.001)。
使用预热设备可能会增加树脂复合材料的颜色变化,特别是在长时间浸泡在如咖啡这样的染色介质中之后。选择合适的预热方法以控制时间和可用性对于维持颜色稳定性可能至关重要。本研究强调了在临床应用中考虑材料选择和预热技术以最小化变色风险的重要性。