Kalam Tamanna, Baumann Matthias, Pötzschner Florian, Reddy C Sudhakar, Ghoddousi Arash, Roy Parth Sarathi, Kuemmerle Tobias
Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Forest Biodiversity and Ecology Division, National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation Balanagar, Hyderabad, India.
Ecol Appl. 2025 Jul;35(5):e70054. doi: 10.1002/eap.70054.
Tropical dry woodlands provide ecosystem services to hundreds of millions of people and support high biodiversity. Despite their importance, many dry woodlands are under high and rising human pressure, including in India, where they provide essential habitat for iconic megafauna. However, there are notable gaps in our understanding of long-term changes in dry woodlands and how they relate to the present-day distribution of megafauna. Here, we reconstructed tropical dry woodland change since the 19th century, identified archetypes of change, and explored their relationship with current megafauna distributions. More specifically, we compared the reliability of existing satellite-based woodland maps and integrated them into an ensemble map of contemporary dry woodland cover in India. This allowed us to derive recent changes in dry woodlands since 1995 and, by integrating them with historical maps, long-term changes since 1880. Finally, we used non-parametric spatial clustering to detect typical patterns of long-term woodland change and compared these to the current distribution of 14 megafauna species. These analyses yielded four major insights. First, we show a massive historical loss of dry woodland cover in India since the 19th century, with over 22 Mha (equaling 65% of dry woodlands) lost, underscoring the threatened nature of these ecosystems. Second, we identified six archetypes of woodland change, three characterized by different levels of continuous woodland decline and three showing a forest transition pattern of historical decline, stability, and subsequent recovery. This highlights the regional variations in woodland dynamics across India's dry woodlands. Third, we found a strong and positive link between current megafauna distribution and high woodland cover, especially for threatened species (r = 0.43, p < 0.05), regardless of woodland histories, pointing to the importance of maintaining larger tracts of dry woodlands for safeguarding megafauna and for megafauna restoration potential where woodlands are recovering. Finally, we show that Indian dry woodlands are still undergoing widespread losses of 6.5 Mha since 1995, and pressure on them has been increasing recently. Therefore, better protection and monitoring of dry woodlands is urgently needed, and our analyses can provide a basis for context-specific land-use and conservation planning.
热带干燥林地为数亿人提供生态系统服务,并支持着高度的生物多样性。尽管它们很重要,但许多干燥林地面临着巨大且不断增加的人类压力,在印度也是如此,印度的干燥林地为标志性大型动物提供了重要栖息地。然而,我们对干燥林地的长期变化以及这些变化与当今大型动物分布之间的关系的理解存在显著差距。在这里,我们重建了自19世纪以来的热带干燥林地变化,确定了变化的原型,并探讨了它们与当前大型动物分布的关系。更具体地说,我们比较了现有的基于卫星的林地地图的可靠性,并将它们整合到印度当代干燥林地覆盖的综合地图中。这使我们能够得出自1995年以来干燥林地的近期变化,并通过将这些变化与历史地图相结合,得出自1880年以来的长期变化。最后,我们使用非参数空间聚类来检测长期林地变化的典型模式,并将这些模式与14种大型动物物种的当前分布进行比较。这些分析得出了四个主要见解。第一,我们表明自19世纪以来印度干燥林地覆盖面积大幅历史性减少,超过2200万公顷(相当于干燥林地的65%)消失,凸显了这些生态系统受到威胁的性质。第二,我们确定了六种林地变化原型,三种以不同程度的持续林地减少为特征,三种呈现出历史衰退、稳定和随后恢复的森林转变模式。这突出了印度干燥林地林地动态的区域差异。第三,我们发现当前大型动物分布与高林地覆盖率之间存在强烈的正相关,特别是对于受威胁物种(r = 0.43,p < 0.05),无论林地历史如何,这表明维护大片干燥林地对于保护大型动物以及在林地恢复地区恢复大型动物的潜力至关重要。最后,我们表明自1995年以来印度干燥林地仍在广泛损失650万公顷,并且近期对它们的压力一直在增加。因此,迫切需要更好地保护和监测干燥林地,我们的分析可以为因地制宜的土地利用和保护规划提供基础。